Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?

Introduction: Stiffness is increased in vertebrae after kyphoplasty with bone cement is performed, which cause an increase in subsequent fractures in adjacent levels. This has led to increased interest in alternative filling materials such as bioactive calcium phosphate ceramics or silicon-based pol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Luque, D. Garríguez, P. Checa Betegon, M. Sanchez, J.L. Perez Gonzalez, I. Dominguez Esteban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-05-01
Series:Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000451
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849729557864644608
author R. Luque
D. Garríguez
P. Checa Betegon
M. Sanchez
J.L. Perez Gonzalez
I. Dominguez Esteban
author_facet R. Luque
D. Garríguez
P. Checa Betegon
M. Sanchez
J.L. Perez Gonzalez
I. Dominguez Esteban
author_sort R. Luque
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Stiffness is increased in vertebrae after kyphoplasty with bone cement is performed, which cause an increase in subsequent fractures in adjacent levels. This has led to increased interest in alternative filling materials such as bioactive calcium phosphate ceramics or silicon-based polymers. This study's objective is to compare the results between kyphoplasty with bone cement and with the VK100 silicone. Materials and methods: This is a comparative, prospective study involving 64 patients 64 patients, 23 treated using VK100 and 41 with PMMA. Clinical, radiological and functional results (Oswestry) and quality of life and (EQ-5D) were analyzed and compared between both groups, focusing on differences in subsequent fractures in adjacent levels. Results: There are no differences between the two treatments in terms of epidemiological factors (age and sex) or hospital management. A significant difference is observed in the gain of vertebral body height, with greater improvement in those treated with PMMA. There is also a higher fracture rate in the PMMA group, the difference is not significant. Finally, both treatments show similar outcomes in pain relief and quality of life. Conclusion: Both VK100 elastoplasty and PMMA kyphoplasty are effective treatments for vertebral fractures. VK100 has a lower rate of complications and adjacent fractures. However, long-term results in terms of pain relief and quality of life are similar, making both treatments equally valid. Resumen: Introducción: La rigidez que se genera en las vértebras tras una cifoplastia con cemento óseo produce un aumento del riesgo de fracturas en vértebras adyacentes. Por esta razón, se han propuesto materiales de relleno alternativos con mayor elasticidad como cerámicas o siliconas bioactivas. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar los resultados entre cifoplastias realizadas con cemento óseo (PMMA) y con la silicona VK100. Material y Métodos: Se trata de un estudio comparativo y prospectivo, en el que participan 64 pacientes, 23 tratados con VK100 y 41 con PMMA. Se analizaron y se compararon los resultados clínicos, radiológicos y funcionales (Oswestry) y la calidad de vida (EQ-5D), y complicaciones tales como fracturas en vértebras adyacentes. Resultados: No existen diferencias en los resultados clínicos ni radiológicos entre ambos tratamientos. Destaca una diferencia significativa en el aumento de altura del cuerpo medio vertebral,siendo mayor en los tratados con PMMA. También destaca una mayor tasa de fracturas en los tratados con PMMA aunque la diferencia no es significativa. Por último, ambos tratamientos tienen resultados similares en lo que respecta al alivio del dolor y la calidad de vida. Conclusión: Tanto la elastoplastia VK100 como la cifoplastia PMMA son tratamientos eficaces para la fractura vertebral. El VK100 tiene una menor tasa de complicaciones y fracturas adyacentes. A pesar de ello los resultados a largo plazo en términos de eficacia dolor y calidad de vida son similares por lo que ambos tratamientos son igual de válidos.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ba2f0328e0644049badcc07a6a67f30
institution DOAJ
issn 1888-4415
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
spelling doaj-art-6ba2f0328e0644049badcc07a6a67f302025-08-20T03:09:12ZengElsevierRevista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología1888-44152025-05-01693T287T29610.1016/j.recot.2025.02.016Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?R. Luque0D. Garríguez1P. Checa Betegon2M. Sanchez3J.L. Perez Gonzalez4I. Dominguez Esteban5Corresponding author.; Servicio Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, SpainServicio Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, SpainServicio Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, SpainServicio Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, SpainServicio Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, SpainServicio Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, SpainIntroduction: Stiffness is increased in vertebrae after kyphoplasty with bone cement is performed, which cause an increase in subsequent fractures in adjacent levels. This has led to increased interest in alternative filling materials such as bioactive calcium phosphate ceramics or silicon-based polymers. This study's objective is to compare the results between kyphoplasty with bone cement and with the VK100 silicone. Materials and methods: This is a comparative, prospective study involving 64 patients 64 patients, 23 treated using VK100 and 41 with PMMA. Clinical, radiological and functional results (Oswestry) and quality of life and (EQ-5D) were analyzed and compared between both groups, focusing on differences in subsequent fractures in adjacent levels. Results: There are no differences between the two treatments in terms of epidemiological factors (age and sex) or hospital management. A significant difference is observed in the gain of vertebral body height, with greater improvement in those treated with PMMA. There is also a higher fracture rate in the PMMA group, the difference is not significant. Finally, both treatments show similar outcomes in pain relief and quality of life. Conclusion: Both VK100 elastoplasty and PMMA kyphoplasty are effective treatments for vertebral fractures. VK100 has a lower rate of complications and adjacent fractures. However, long-term results in terms of pain relief and quality of life are similar, making both treatments equally valid. Resumen: Introducción: La rigidez que se genera en las vértebras tras una cifoplastia con cemento óseo produce un aumento del riesgo de fracturas en vértebras adyacentes. Por esta razón, se han propuesto materiales de relleno alternativos con mayor elasticidad como cerámicas o siliconas bioactivas. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar los resultados entre cifoplastias realizadas con cemento óseo (PMMA) y con la silicona VK100. Material y Métodos: Se trata de un estudio comparativo y prospectivo, en el que participan 64 pacientes, 23 tratados con VK100 y 41 con PMMA. Se analizaron y se compararon los resultados clínicos, radiológicos y funcionales (Oswestry) y la calidad de vida (EQ-5D), y complicaciones tales como fracturas en vértebras adyacentes. Resultados: No existen diferencias en los resultados clínicos ni radiológicos entre ambos tratamientos. Destaca una diferencia significativa en el aumento de altura del cuerpo medio vertebral,siendo mayor en los tratados con PMMA. También destaca una mayor tasa de fracturas en los tratados con PMMA aunque la diferencia no es significativa. Por último, ambos tratamientos tienen resultados similares en lo que respecta al alivio del dolor y la calidad de vida. Conclusión: Tanto la elastoplastia VK100 como la cifoplastia PMMA son tratamientos eficaces para la fractura vertebral. El VK100 tiene una menor tasa de complicaciones y fracturas adyacentes. A pesar de ello los resultados a largo plazo en términos de eficacia dolor y calidad de vida son similares por lo que ambos tratamientos son igual de válidos.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000451OsteoporosisFractura vertebralCifoplastiaPMMAVK100Oswestry
spellingShingle R. Luque
D. Garríguez
P. Checa Betegon
M. Sanchez
J.L. Perez Gonzalez
I. Dominguez Esteban
Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Osteoporosis
Fractura vertebral
Cifoplastia
PMMA
VK100
Oswestry
title Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?
title_full Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?
title_fullStr Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?
title_full_unstemmed Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?
title_short Silicone kyphoplasty (elastoplasty) versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Does this new technique reduce the complications?
title_sort silicone kyphoplasty elastoplasty versus traditional cement kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures does this new technique reduce the complications
topic Osteoporosis
Fractura vertebral
Cifoplastia
PMMA
VK100
Oswestry
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000451
work_keys_str_mv AT rluque siliconekyphoplastyelastoplastyversustraditionalcementkyphoplastyforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesdoesthisnewtechniquereducethecomplications
AT dgarriguez siliconekyphoplastyelastoplastyversustraditionalcementkyphoplastyforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesdoesthisnewtechniquereducethecomplications
AT pchecabetegon siliconekyphoplastyelastoplastyversustraditionalcementkyphoplastyforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesdoesthisnewtechniquereducethecomplications
AT msanchez siliconekyphoplastyelastoplastyversustraditionalcementkyphoplastyforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesdoesthisnewtechniquereducethecomplications
AT jlperezgonzalez siliconekyphoplastyelastoplastyversustraditionalcementkyphoplastyforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesdoesthisnewtechniquereducethecomplications
AT idominguezesteban siliconekyphoplastyelastoplastyversustraditionalcementkyphoplastyforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesdoesthisnewtechniquereducethecomplications