Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review

Objective To evaluate the impact of heart valve clinics (HVCs) versus standard of care (SOC) on disease detection, timing of intervention and clinical outcomes in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD).Design A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuqiang Wang, Siyu He, Yingqiang Guo, Tingqian Cao, Zechao Ran, Xiaoting Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/6/e096538.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849685533992681472
author Yuqiang Wang
Siyu He
Yingqiang Guo
Tingqian Cao
Zechao Ran
Xiaoting Li
author_facet Yuqiang Wang
Siyu He
Yingqiang Guo
Tingqian Cao
Zechao Ran
Xiaoting Li
author_sort Yuqiang Wang
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the impact of heart valve clinics (HVCs) versus standard of care (SOC) on disease detection, timing of intervention and clinical outcomes in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD).Design A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024518787).Data sources PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1 May 2025.Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials or cohort studies comparing patients managed in HVCs with those receiving SOC, and reporting on outcomes such as mortality, cardiac events, time to symptom reporting or symptom severity. Studies were excluded if they lacked detailed HVC protocols, single-arm designs or were published as abstracts only.Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by a senior adjudicator. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies.Results Three high-quality prospective cohort studies (N=1082) were included. Two studies reported mortality and cardiac events: one, a before-and-after controlled trial (n=382), recorded 11 deaths in the HVC group; the other reported 4 deaths in the HVC group (n=156) versus 17 deaths in the SOC group (n=156) (p<0.05). Additionally, two studies found that HVCs significantly reduced the interval between symptom onset and reporting (p<0.05), as well as the proportion of patients presenting with severe symptoms (defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class or Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class ≥III).Conclusion HVCs facilitate stratified and precise management of the whole-life cycle of patients with VHD, enhancing early detection and referral, and leading to reduced mortality and major cardiac events compared with SOC.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b966e5eb2af495d979bb76e4cc3233c
institution DOAJ
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-6b966e5eb2af495d979bb76e4cc3233c2025-08-20T03:23:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-06-0115610.1136/bmjopen-2024-096538Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic reviewYuqiang Wang0Siyu He1Yingqiang Guo2Tingqian Cao3Zechao Ran4Xiaoting Li5Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaCardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaCardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaIntegrated Care Management Center, Outpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaCardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaCardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaObjective To evaluate the impact of heart valve clinics (HVCs) versus standard of care (SOC) on disease detection, timing of intervention and clinical outcomes in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD).Design A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024518787).Data sources PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1 May 2025.Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials or cohort studies comparing patients managed in HVCs with those receiving SOC, and reporting on outcomes such as mortality, cardiac events, time to symptom reporting or symptom severity. Studies were excluded if they lacked detailed HVC protocols, single-arm designs or were published as abstracts only.Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by a senior adjudicator. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies.Results Three high-quality prospective cohort studies (N=1082) were included. Two studies reported mortality and cardiac events: one, a before-and-after controlled trial (n=382), recorded 11 deaths in the HVC group; the other reported 4 deaths in the HVC group (n=156) versus 17 deaths in the SOC group (n=156) (p<0.05). Additionally, two studies found that HVCs significantly reduced the interval between symptom onset and reporting (p<0.05), as well as the proportion of patients presenting with severe symptoms (defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class or Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class ≥III).Conclusion HVCs facilitate stratified and precise management of the whole-life cycle of patients with VHD, enhancing early detection and referral, and leading to reduced mortality and major cardiac events compared with SOC.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/6/e096538.full
spellingShingle Yuqiang Wang
Siyu He
Yingqiang Guo
Tingqian Cao
Zechao Ran
Xiaoting Li
Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review
BMJ Open
title Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review
title_full Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review
title_fullStr Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review
title_short Benefits of heart valve clinics for patients: a systematic review
title_sort benefits of heart valve clinics for patients a systematic review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/6/e096538.full
work_keys_str_mv AT yuqiangwang benefitsofheartvalveclinicsforpatientsasystematicreview
AT siyuhe benefitsofheartvalveclinicsforpatientsasystematicreview
AT yingqiangguo benefitsofheartvalveclinicsforpatientsasystematicreview
AT tingqiancao benefitsofheartvalveclinicsforpatientsasystematicreview
AT zechaoran benefitsofheartvalveclinicsforpatientsasystematicreview
AT xiaotingli benefitsofheartvalveclinicsforpatientsasystematicreview