Estimating the Lifetime Parameters of the Odd-Generalized-Exponential–Inverse-Weibull Distribution Using Progressive First-Failure Censoring: A Methodology with an Application

This paper investigates statistical methods for estimating unknown lifetime parameters using a progressive first-failure censoring dataset. The failure mode’s lifetime distribution is modeled by the odd-generalized-exponential–inverse-Weibull distribution. Maximum-likelihood estimators for the model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmoud M. Ramadan, Rashad M. EL-Sagheer, Amel Abd-El-Monem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Axioms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1680/13/12/822
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper investigates statistical methods for estimating unknown lifetime parameters using a progressive first-failure censoring dataset. The failure mode’s lifetime distribution is modeled by the odd-generalized-exponential–inverse-Weibull distribution. Maximum-likelihood estimators for the model parameters, including the survival, hazard, and inverse hazard rate functions, are obtained, though they lack closed-form expressions. The Newton–Raphson method is used to compute these estimations. Confidence intervals for the parameters are approximated via the normal distribution of the maximum-likelihood estimation. The Fisher information matrix is derived using the missing information principle, and the delta method is applied to approximate the confidence intervals for the survival, hazard rate, and inverse hazard rate functions. Bayes estimators were calculated with the squared error, linear exponential, and general entropy loss functions, utilizing independent gamma distributions for informative priors. Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling provides the highest-posterior-density credible intervals and Bayesian point estimates for the parameters and reliability characteristics. This study evaluates these methods through Monte Carlo simulations, comparing Bayes and maximum-likelihood estimates based on mean squared errors for point estimates, average interval widths, and coverage probabilities for interval estimators. A real dataset is also analyzed to illustrate the proposed methods.
ISSN:2075-1680