Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands

Abstract Introduction Several European countries show potential for pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision expansion, with many men who have sex with men (MSM) on waiting lists. In the Netherlands, approximately 15,000 PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM are awaiting PrEP access. We modelled the epidemio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haoyi Wang, Stephanie Popping, David van deVijver, Kai J. Jonas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of the International AIDS Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26516
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849683539834961920
author Haoyi Wang
Stephanie Popping
David van deVijver
Kai J. Jonas
author_facet Haoyi Wang
Stephanie Popping
David van deVijver
Kai J. Jonas
author_sort Haoyi Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Several European countries show potential for pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision expansion, with many men who have sex with men (MSM) on waiting lists. In the Netherlands, approximately 15,000 PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM are awaiting PrEP access. We modelled the epidemiological and economic impact of extending PrEP provision considering several PrEP provision routes (National PrEP Programme and alternative PrEP providers). Methods We calibrated our HIV transmission model among the Dutch MSM epidemic. PrEP was expanded from 2022 onwards, covering an additional 3000 MSM on the waiting list and in addition one‐third (5000), two‐thirds (10,000), and all (15,000) PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM by 2024, compared to a non‐expansion scenario. The epidemiological impact was projected by 2030. Costs were calculated from a third‐party payer's perspective over 40 years with Dutch‐specific quality‐adjusted life years (QALY). Additionally, a budget impact analysis was performed over 5 years. Results Covering the 3000 waiting‐list MSM, one‐third, two‐thirds and all PrEP eligible/intending MSM by 2024 will avert 17 (5.7%), 46 (15.2%), 88 (29.1%) and 115 (37.9%) cumulative new HIV acquisitions compared to the base‐case scenario. Consequently, 4, 2, 0 and 0 new HIV acquisitions will result by 2030, respectively. The epidemiological impact of PrEP expansion is sensitive to the users’ PrEP adherence, but overall minimal by PrEP targeting strategies, given the strongly declining epidemic. Increasing the National PrEP Programme's capacity incurred more costs to the payer (short‐term budget impact ranging from €2.25 to €45.29 million). PrEP expansion can be cost‐saving when all PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM are covered and fully provided by alternative PrEP providers, with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of −€2160/QALY over 40 years. This scenario dominated over all other scenarios. Our cost‐effectiveness analysis is most sensitive to the individual co‐payment for PrEP‐related testing when accessing PrEP via alternative PrEP providers and on‐demand PrEP use. Conclusions Expanding PrEP coverage is crucial to reduce HIV acquisitions further and reach zero new acquisitions by 2030. As the Dutch National PrEP Programme reached capacity limits, PrEP expansion through alternative routes should be encouraged. Nevertheless, balancing out‐of‐pocket expenses and reimbursed care is key for healthcare equity.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b57a0f4c4624ed684fc0ab9c6d401bb
institution DOAJ
issn 1758-2652
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the International AIDS Society
spelling doaj-art-6b57a0f4c4624ed684fc0ab9c6d401bb2025-08-20T03:23:48ZengWileyJournal of the International AIDS Society1758-26522025-06-01286n/an/a10.1002/jia2.26516Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the NetherlandsHaoyi Wang0Stephanie Popping1David van deVijver2Kai J. Jonas3Department of Work and Social Psychology Maastricht University Maastricht The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Rotterdam The NetherlandsViroscience Department Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Work and Social Psychology Maastricht University Maastricht The NetherlandsAbstract Introduction Several European countries show potential for pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision expansion, with many men who have sex with men (MSM) on waiting lists. In the Netherlands, approximately 15,000 PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM are awaiting PrEP access. We modelled the epidemiological and economic impact of extending PrEP provision considering several PrEP provision routes (National PrEP Programme and alternative PrEP providers). Methods We calibrated our HIV transmission model among the Dutch MSM epidemic. PrEP was expanded from 2022 onwards, covering an additional 3000 MSM on the waiting list and in addition one‐third (5000), two‐thirds (10,000), and all (15,000) PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM by 2024, compared to a non‐expansion scenario. The epidemiological impact was projected by 2030. Costs were calculated from a third‐party payer's perspective over 40 years with Dutch‐specific quality‐adjusted life years (QALY). Additionally, a budget impact analysis was performed over 5 years. Results Covering the 3000 waiting‐list MSM, one‐third, two‐thirds and all PrEP eligible/intending MSM by 2024 will avert 17 (5.7%), 46 (15.2%), 88 (29.1%) and 115 (37.9%) cumulative new HIV acquisitions compared to the base‐case scenario. Consequently, 4, 2, 0 and 0 new HIV acquisitions will result by 2030, respectively. The epidemiological impact of PrEP expansion is sensitive to the users’ PrEP adherence, but overall minimal by PrEP targeting strategies, given the strongly declining epidemic. Increasing the National PrEP Programme's capacity incurred more costs to the payer (short‐term budget impact ranging from €2.25 to €45.29 million). PrEP expansion can be cost‐saving when all PrEP‐eligible/intending MSM are covered and fully provided by alternative PrEP providers, with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of −€2160/QALY over 40 years. This scenario dominated over all other scenarios. Our cost‐effectiveness analysis is most sensitive to the individual co‐payment for PrEP‐related testing when accessing PrEP via alternative PrEP providers and on‐demand PrEP use. Conclusions Expanding PrEP coverage is crucial to reduce HIV acquisitions further and reach zero new acquisitions by 2030. As the Dutch National PrEP Programme reached capacity limits, PrEP expansion through alternative routes should be encouraged. Nevertheless, balancing out‐of‐pocket expenses and reimbursed care is key for healthcare equity.https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26516budget impact analysiscost‐effectiveness analysisEuropeHIVmathematical modellingmen who have sex with men
spellingShingle Haoyi Wang
Stephanie Popping
David van deVijver
Kai J. Jonas
Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands
Journal of the International AIDS Society
budget impact analysis
cost‐effectiveness analysis
Europe
HIV
mathematical modelling
men who have sex with men
title Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands
title_full Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands
title_short Epidemiological impact and cost‐effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands
title_sort epidemiological impact and cost effectiveness analysis of prep provision expansion among msm in the netherlands
topic budget impact analysis
cost‐effectiveness analysis
Europe
HIV
mathematical modelling
men who have sex with men
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26516
work_keys_str_mv AT haoyiwang epidemiologicalimpactandcosteffectivenessanalysisofprepprovisionexpansionamongmsminthenetherlands
AT stephaniepopping epidemiologicalimpactandcosteffectivenessanalysisofprepprovisionexpansionamongmsminthenetherlands
AT davidvandevijver epidemiologicalimpactandcosteffectivenessanalysisofprepprovisionexpansionamongmsminthenetherlands
AT kaijjonas epidemiologicalimpactandcosteffectivenessanalysisofprepprovisionexpansionamongmsminthenetherlands