A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed procedure for patients experiencing persistent symptomatic instability, aimed at achieving a functionally stable knee while minimizing the risk of secondary injuries and long-term complications. An anterior crucia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharat Balemane, Sushanth Sudhir Rao, Hishanil Rasheed, Imthiaz Ahammed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jocr.co.in/wp/2025/04/01/a-comparative-study-to-assess-functional-outcomes-and-proprioception-in-remnant-preserving-versus-standard-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849689002422042624
author Sharat Balemane
Sushanth Sudhir Rao
Hishanil Rasheed
Imthiaz Ahammed
author_facet Sharat Balemane
Sushanth Sudhir Rao
Hishanil Rasheed
Imthiaz Ahammed
author_sort Sharat Balemane
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed procedure for patients experiencing persistent symptomatic instability, aimed at achieving a functionally stable knee while minimizing the risk of secondary injuries and long-term complications. An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can result in damage and loss of proprioceptive receptors, leading to mechanical instability. As a result, current research is exploring innovative strategies to improve ACL healing, lower the failure rate, expedite recovery, and restore the biomechanics of the knee to pre-injury levels. Objectives: This study aimed to study the functional outcomes and post-operative proprioceptive function in patients who undergo remnant-preserving ACLR (RP-ACLR) compared to the standard ACLR (S-ACLR) technique. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted among patients who presented with ACL injury, and who underwent either arthroscopic remnant RP-ACLR or arthroscopic S-ACLR. Patient’s functional outcome was measured by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, Lysholm knee score, Visual Analog Scale score, and proprioception by joint position error (JPE) in degrees was noted at presentation, at 15 days, 30 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 30 cases of with ACL injury during the study period who underwent RP-ACLR and 30 cases of ACL injury who underwent S-ACLR. There were 83.3% males and 16.7% females in RP-ACLR group and 86.7% males and 13.3% females S-ACLR group with patients being maximally at the age group of 26–30 years (41.7%). The average time since injury of 4.04 months and average surgical time was 90 min. There was progressive improvement in functional outcome at 15 days, 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months (P = 0.01). At 6 months, the IKDC and Lysholm scores were 75.97 and 74.93 in the RP-ACLR group, 74.30 and 74.73 in S-ACLR group, respectively. There was a statistically significant enhancement in proprioception, measured by JPE in degrees between the groups as assessed at 15° flexion (P = 0.02), 45° flexion (P = 0.01), and 60° flexion (P = 0.01). Conclusion: Our results indicated no significant difference in functional outcomes between the two groups as assessed by the IKDC and Lysholm Knee scores, although both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively. In conclusion, the significant differences in proprioceptive outcomes observed in the current study suggest that remnant preservation may enhance early sensory feedback post-ACLR.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b4a42eabadd48c58e515a2bf0fabe74
institution DOAJ
issn 2250-0685
2321-3817
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
spelling doaj-art-6b4a42eabadd48c58e515a2bf0fabe742025-08-20T03:21:47ZengIndian Orthopaedic Research GroupJournal of Orthopaedic Case Reports2250-06852321-38172025-04-0115422923810.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i04.5508A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionSharat BalemaneSushanth Sudhir RaoHishanil RasheedImthiaz AhammedIntroduction: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed procedure for patients experiencing persistent symptomatic instability, aimed at achieving a functionally stable knee while minimizing the risk of secondary injuries and long-term complications. An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can result in damage and loss of proprioceptive receptors, leading to mechanical instability. As a result, current research is exploring innovative strategies to improve ACL healing, lower the failure rate, expedite recovery, and restore the biomechanics of the knee to pre-injury levels. Objectives: This study aimed to study the functional outcomes and post-operative proprioceptive function in patients who undergo remnant-preserving ACLR (RP-ACLR) compared to the standard ACLR (S-ACLR) technique. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted among patients who presented with ACL injury, and who underwent either arthroscopic remnant RP-ACLR or arthroscopic S-ACLR. Patient’s functional outcome was measured by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, Lysholm knee score, Visual Analog Scale score, and proprioception by joint position error (JPE) in degrees was noted at presentation, at 15 days, 30 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 30 cases of with ACL injury during the study period who underwent RP-ACLR and 30 cases of ACL injury who underwent S-ACLR. There were 83.3% males and 16.7% females in RP-ACLR group and 86.7% males and 13.3% females S-ACLR group with patients being maximally at the age group of 26–30 years (41.7%). The average time since injury of 4.04 months and average surgical time was 90 min. There was progressive improvement in functional outcome at 15 days, 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months (P = 0.01). At 6 months, the IKDC and Lysholm scores were 75.97 and 74.93 in the RP-ACLR group, 74.30 and 74.73 in S-ACLR group, respectively. There was a statistically significant enhancement in proprioception, measured by JPE in degrees between the groups as assessed at 15° flexion (P = 0.02), 45° flexion (P = 0.01), and 60° flexion (P = 0.01). Conclusion: Our results indicated no significant difference in functional outcomes between the two groups as assessed by the IKDC and Lysholm Knee scores, although both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively. In conclusion, the significant differences in proprioceptive outcomes observed in the current study suggest that remnant preservation may enhance early sensory feedback post-ACLR.https://jocr.co.in/wp/2025/04/01/a-comparative-study-to-assess-functional-outcomes-and-proprioception-in-remnant-preserving-versus-standard-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction/anterior cruciate ligament injuriesarthroscopyanterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
spellingShingle Sharat Balemane
Sushanth Sudhir Rao
Hishanil Rasheed
Imthiaz Ahammed
A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
anterior cruciate ligament injuries
arthroscopy
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short A Comparative Study to Assess Functional Outcomes and Proprioception in Remnant-Preserving versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort comparative study to assess functional outcomes and proprioception in remnant preserving versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic anterior cruciate ligament injuries
arthroscopy
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
url https://jocr.co.in/wp/2025/04/01/a-comparative-study-to-assess-functional-outcomes-and-proprioception-in-remnant-preserving-versus-standard-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction/
work_keys_str_mv AT sharatbalemane acomparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT sushanthsudhirrao acomparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT hishanilrasheed acomparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT imthiazahammed acomparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT sharatbalemane comparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT sushanthsudhirrao comparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT hishanilrasheed comparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT imthiazahammed comparativestudytoassessfunctionaloutcomesandproprioceptioninremnantpreservingversusstandardanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction