Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.
<h4>Objective</h4>As the first model in predicting the failure of early medical abortion (EMA) was inefficient, this study aims to develop and validate a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of EMAs more accurately in a clinical setting.<h4>Methods</h4>The derivat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315025 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832589912356945920 |
---|---|
author | An-Hao Liu Bin Xu Xiu-Wen Li Yue-Wen Yu Hui-Xin Guan Xiao-Lu Sun Yan-Zhen Lin Li-Li Zhang Xian-Di Zhuo Jia Li Wen-Qun Chen Wen-Feng Hu Ming-Zhu Ye Xiu-Min Huang Xun Chen |
author_facet | An-Hao Liu Bin Xu Xiu-Wen Li Yue-Wen Yu Hui-Xin Guan Xiao-Lu Sun Yan-Zhen Lin Li-Li Zhang Xian-Di Zhuo Jia Li Wen-Qun Chen Wen-Feng Hu Ming-Zhu Ye Xiu-Min Huang Xun Chen |
author_sort | An-Hao Liu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Objective</h4>As the first model in predicting the failure of early medical abortion (EMA) was inefficient, this study aims to develop and validate a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of EMAs more accurately in a clinical setting.<h4>Methods</h4>The derivation cohort was obtained from a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. The clinically significant risk factors were identified and combined with their corresponding odds ratios to establish a risk assessment model. The risk factors were assigned scores based on their respective weightings. The model's performance was evaluated by an external validation cohort obtained from a tertiary hospital. The outcome was defined as the incidence of EMA failure.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 126,420 patients who had undergone medical abortions were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, and the pooled failure rate was 6.7%. The final risk factors consisted of gestational age, maternal age, parity, previous termination of pregnancy, marital status, type of residence, and differences between gestational age calculated using the last menstrual period and that measured via ultrasound. The risk factors were assigned scores based on their respective weightings, with a maximum score of 19. The clinical prediction model exhibited a good discrimination, as validated by external verification (402 patients) with an area under the curve of 0.857 (95% confidence interval 0.804-0.910). The optimal cutoff value was determined to be 13.5 points, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 75.4%.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study effectively establishes a simple risk assessment model including seven routinely available clinical parameters for predicting EMA failure. In preliminary validation, this model demonstrates good performance in terms of predictive efficiency, accuracy, calibration, and clinical benefit. However, more research and validation are warranted for future application.<h4>Trial registration number</h4>CRD42023485388. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-6b3b3345089947e9a3a72ac3a786bece |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj-art-6b3b3345089947e9a3a72ac3a786bece2025-01-24T05:31:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031502510.1371/journal.pone.0315025Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.An-Hao LiuBin XuXiu-Wen LiYue-Wen YuHui-Xin GuanXiao-Lu SunYan-Zhen LinLi-Li ZhangXian-Di ZhuoJia LiWen-Qun ChenWen-Feng HuMing-Zhu YeXiu-Min HuangXun Chen<h4>Objective</h4>As the first model in predicting the failure of early medical abortion (EMA) was inefficient, this study aims to develop and validate a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of EMAs more accurately in a clinical setting.<h4>Methods</h4>The derivation cohort was obtained from a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. The clinically significant risk factors were identified and combined with their corresponding odds ratios to establish a risk assessment model. The risk factors were assigned scores based on their respective weightings. The model's performance was evaluated by an external validation cohort obtained from a tertiary hospital. The outcome was defined as the incidence of EMA failure.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 126,420 patients who had undergone medical abortions were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, and the pooled failure rate was 6.7%. The final risk factors consisted of gestational age, maternal age, parity, previous termination of pregnancy, marital status, type of residence, and differences between gestational age calculated using the last menstrual period and that measured via ultrasound. The risk factors were assigned scores based on their respective weightings, with a maximum score of 19. The clinical prediction model exhibited a good discrimination, as validated by external verification (402 patients) with an area under the curve of 0.857 (95% confidence interval 0.804-0.910). The optimal cutoff value was determined to be 13.5 points, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 75.4%.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study effectively establishes a simple risk assessment model including seven routinely available clinical parameters for predicting EMA failure. In preliminary validation, this model demonstrates good performance in terms of predictive efficiency, accuracy, calibration, and clinical benefit. However, more research and validation are warranted for future application.<h4>Trial registration number</h4>CRD42023485388.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315025 |
spellingShingle | An-Hao Liu Bin Xu Xiu-Wen Li Yue-Wen Yu Hui-Xin Guan Xiao-Lu Sun Yan-Zhen Lin Li-Li Zhang Xian-Di Zhuo Jia Li Wen-Qun Chen Wen-Feng Hu Ming-Zhu Ye Xiu-Min Huang Xun Chen Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
title | Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_full | Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_short | Development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions: A clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_sort | development and validation of a risk assessment model for predicting the failure of early medical abortions a clinical prediction model study based on a systematic review and meta analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anhaoliu developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT binxu developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiuwenli developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuewenyu developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huixinguan developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaolusun developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanzhenlin developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lilizhang developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiandizhuo developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiali developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenqunchen developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenfenghu developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mingzhuye developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiuminhuang developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xunchen developmentandvalidationofariskassessmentmodelforpredictingthefailureofearlymedicalabortionsaclinicalpredictionmodelstudybasedonasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |