Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites

The mechanical coating (MC) method was used to deposit 316 stainless steel (SS316), TiC, and SS 316-TiC nanocomposite coatings on SS 316 substrates using a ball mill machine at milling durations of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 h using relatively cheap and abundant raw material. The chemical composition of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hesamoddin Hamedi, Taghi Isfahani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:Results in Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024012210
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850121707877040128
author Hesamoddin Hamedi
Taghi Isfahani
author_facet Hesamoddin Hamedi
Taghi Isfahani
author_sort Hesamoddin Hamedi
collection DOAJ
description The mechanical coating (MC) method was used to deposit 316 stainless steel (SS316), TiC, and SS 316-TiC nanocomposite coatings on SS 316 substrates using a ball mill machine at milling durations of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 h using relatively cheap and abundant raw material. The chemical composition of the SS 316, TiC, and SS 316-xTiC (x = 20, 50, 80 wt%) nanocomposite coatings deposited by the mechanical coating method has been investigated and the hardness values and the wear and corrosion mechanisms were presented. Dense and uniform coatings were obtained using a ball-to-powder weight ratio (BPR) of 20:1 and an MC duration of 5 h. Among the samples, the SS316-20 wt%TiC coating exhibited the best wear and corrosion resistance. The least mean coefficient of friction was 0.3 for the SS316-20 wt%TiC deposited sample while the largest mean coefficient was for the SS316-80 % TiC sample to be 0.76. The SS 316-20 wt% TiC sample had the lowest wear rate where the highest value was for the %100SS 316 sample being 0.36 × 10−6 and 19 × 10−6 (mm3/Nm), respectively. Corrosion tests revealed that the SS316-20%TiC sample had the best corrosion resistance among the composite samples having a corrosion resistance of 4.9358 μm/Y. The corrosion resistance decreased with the increase of TiC whereas the 80 % TiC coating had severe pitting. Cracks and pores present in the non-uniform 100 % TiC coating resulted in lower corrosion resistance compared to the 100 % SS 316 and composite coatings.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b137b600faf4ca3ae60e82abbfef071
institution OA Journals
issn 2590-1230
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Results in Engineering
spelling doaj-art-6b137b600faf4ca3ae60e82abbfef0712025-08-20T02:35:00ZengElsevierResults in Engineering2590-12302024-12-012410296610.1016/j.rineng.2024.102966Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocompositesHesamoddin Hamedi0Taghi Isfahani1Materials Engineering Group, Golpayegan College of Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, 87717-67498, Golpayegan, IranCorresponding author.; Materials Engineering Group, Golpayegan College of Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, 87717-67498, Golpayegan, IranThe mechanical coating (MC) method was used to deposit 316 stainless steel (SS316), TiC, and SS 316-TiC nanocomposite coatings on SS 316 substrates using a ball mill machine at milling durations of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 h using relatively cheap and abundant raw material. The chemical composition of the SS 316, TiC, and SS 316-xTiC (x = 20, 50, 80 wt%) nanocomposite coatings deposited by the mechanical coating method has been investigated and the hardness values and the wear and corrosion mechanisms were presented. Dense and uniform coatings were obtained using a ball-to-powder weight ratio (BPR) of 20:1 and an MC duration of 5 h. Among the samples, the SS316-20 wt%TiC coating exhibited the best wear and corrosion resistance. The least mean coefficient of friction was 0.3 for the SS316-20 wt%TiC deposited sample while the largest mean coefficient was for the SS316-80 % TiC sample to be 0.76. The SS 316-20 wt% TiC sample had the lowest wear rate where the highest value was for the %100SS 316 sample being 0.36 × 10−6 and 19 × 10−6 (mm3/Nm), respectively. Corrosion tests revealed that the SS316-20%TiC sample had the best corrosion resistance among the composite samples having a corrosion resistance of 4.9358 μm/Y. The corrosion resistance decreased with the increase of TiC whereas the 80 % TiC coating had severe pitting. Cracks and pores present in the non-uniform 100 % TiC coating resulted in lower corrosion resistance compared to the 100 % SS 316 and composite coatings.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024012210Mechanical coating methodTiC-SS 316Wear propertiesCorrosion propertiesMicrohardness
spellingShingle Hesamoddin Hamedi
Taghi Isfahani
Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites
Results in Engineering
Mechanical coating method
TiC-SS 316
Wear properties
Corrosion properties
Microhardness
title Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites
title_full Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites
title_fullStr Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites
title_full_unstemmed Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites
title_short Wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless Steel-TiC nanocomposites
title_sort wear and corrosion properties of mechanically coated 316 stainless steel tic nanocomposites
topic Mechanical coating method
TiC-SS 316
Wear properties
Corrosion properties
Microhardness
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024012210
work_keys_str_mv AT hesamoddinhamedi wearandcorrosionpropertiesofmechanicallycoated316stainlesssteelticnanocomposites
AT taghiisfahani wearandcorrosionpropertiesofmechanicallycoated316stainlesssteelticnanocomposites