Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients

Objective. This study aims to evaluate eyedrop self-installation techniques and factors affecting these techniques in glaucoma patients. Methods. Researchers directly observed eyedrop instillation procedures of 66 glaucoma patients. Contact with periocular tissues and instillation onto ocular surfac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ozcan Kayikcioglu, Sinan Bilgin, Murat Uyar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Scientifica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9183272
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548463758278656
author Ozcan Kayikcioglu
Sinan Bilgin
Murat Uyar
author_facet Ozcan Kayikcioglu
Sinan Bilgin
Murat Uyar
author_sort Ozcan Kayikcioglu
collection DOAJ
description Objective. This study aims to evaluate eyedrop self-installation techniques and factors affecting these techniques in glaucoma patients. Methods. Researchers directly observed eyedrop instillation procedures of 66 glaucoma patients. Contact with periocular tissues and instillation onto ocular surface or conjunctival fornices were considered. Correlations of instillation patterns with patient characteristics including age, gender, intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, visual field loss, and total intake of glaucoma medication and handgrip strength score were searched. Results. The average handgrip strength in the instillation without periocular contact group was 66.4 ± 19.7 kg, while the average handgrip strength score was 55.9 ± 20.9 kg in the instillation with contact group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.039). No statistically significant correlation was found between handgrip strength and the mean number of glaucoma medications, c/d, intraocular pressure (p>0.05). Also there was no significant relation between mean handgrip strength score and the severity of the visual field defect (p=0.191). Conclusion. Patients especially with severe glaucomatous damage should be adequately instructed about the proper techniques for self-instillation of eyedrops and motivated to use a proper technique. Also, it is possible to suggest that patients with a higher handgrip strength, indicating the well-being of general health, may be doing better in properly instilling glaucoma eyedrops.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b0c9ff445db434c813483f9c2cfe60e
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-908X
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Scientifica
spelling doaj-art-6b0c9ff445db434c813483f9c2cfe60e2025-02-03T06:13:58ZengWileyScientifica2090-908X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/91832729183272Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma PatientsOzcan Kayikcioglu0Sinan Bilgin1Murat Uyar2Department of Ophthalmology, Hafsa Sultan Hospital, Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sifa University Faculty of Medicine, 35410 Izmir, TurkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sifa University Faculty of Medicine, 35410 Izmir, TurkeyObjective. This study aims to evaluate eyedrop self-installation techniques and factors affecting these techniques in glaucoma patients. Methods. Researchers directly observed eyedrop instillation procedures of 66 glaucoma patients. Contact with periocular tissues and instillation onto ocular surface or conjunctival fornices were considered. Correlations of instillation patterns with patient characteristics including age, gender, intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, visual field loss, and total intake of glaucoma medication and handgrip strength score were searched. Results. The average handgrip strength in the instillation without periocular contact group was 66.4 ± 19.7 kg, while the average handgrip strength score was 55.9 ± 20.9 kg in the instillation with contact group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.039). No statistically significant correlation was found between handgrip strength and the mean number of glaucoma medications, c/d, intraocular pressure (p>0.05). Also there was no significant relation between mean handgrip strength score and the severity of the visual field defect (p=0.191). Conclusion. Patients especially with severe glaucomatous damage should be adequately instructed about the proper techniques for self-instillation of eyedrops and motivated to use a proper technique. Also, it is possible to suggest that patients with a higher handgrip strength, indicating the well-being of general health, may be doing better in properly instilling glaucoma eyedrops.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9183272
spellingShingle Ozcan Kayikcioglu
Sinan Bilgin
Murat Uyar
Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients
Scientifica
title Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients
title_full Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients
title_fullStr Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients
title_short Review on the Eyedrop Self-Instillation Techniques and Factors Affecting These Techniques in Glaucoma Patients
title_sort review on the eyedrop self instillation techniques and factors affecting these techniques in glaucoma patients
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9183272
work_keys_str_mv AT ozcankayikcioglu reviewontheeyedropselfinstillationtechniquesandfactorsaffectingthesetechniquesinglaucomapatients
AT sinanbilgin reviewontheeyedropselfinstillationtechniquesandfactorsaffectingthesetechniquesinglaucomapatients
AT muratuyar reviewontheeyedropselfinstillationtechniquesandfactorsaffectingthesetechniquesinglaucomapatients