Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study

Abstract Objectives In July 2017, supplementary guidelines on anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants, were published in Japan. We investigated the changes in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions after the publication of the supplement, examined the risk fac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keita Saito, Hironobu Nagumo, Takashi Ashikawa, Tomoyuki Funato, So Nakaji, Hiroki Matsui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-04-01
Series:DEN Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.153
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849321712964861952
author Keita Saito
Hironobu Nagumo
Takashi Ashikawa
Tomoyuki Funato
So Nakaji
Hiroki Matsui
author_facet Keita Saito
Hironobu Nagumo
Takashi Ashikawa
Tomoyuki Funato
So Nakaji
Hiroki Matsui
author_sort Keita Saito
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives In July 2017, supplementary guidelines on anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants, were published in Japan. We investigated the changes in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions after the publication of the supplement, examined the risk factors, and developed a predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding. Methods We included 2272 gastric ESD cases from our hospital between May 2003 and June 2021 and classified them into two groups: 1789 cases before and 483 after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. A predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding was developed using the pre‐publication cohort data. Results The proportion of patients receiving warfarin decreased (5.0% vs. 1.4%) and those receiving direct oral anticoagulants increased (1.2% vs. 6.8%) after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. Post‐ESD bleeding occurred in 61 patients, but there was no significant difference in the bleeding rate between the groups (50 [2.8%] vs. 11 [2.3%] patients, respectively). Five risk factors (number of antithrombotic agents, dialysis, heparin replacement, resection specimen size, and procedure time) were identified for model development. The C‐statistic for the model and post‐publication cohorts were 0.83 and 0.72, respectively. In the model, each risk factor for postoperative bleeding was scored, and the risk was classified into three levels according to the total score. Bleeding rates at low, intermediate, and high risks were 1.6%, 10.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. Conclusion Despite changes in patient characteristics and clinical practice regarding ESD before and after the publication of the supplementary guidelines, we could still develop a simple and useful predictive model.
format Article
id doaj-art-6af4cbb131ac4b009e2c699d973f5d33
institution Kabale University
issn 2692-4609
language English
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series DEN Open
spelling doaj-art-6af4cbb131ac4b009e2c699d973f5d332025-08-20T03:49:41ZengWileyDEN Open2692-46092023-04-0131n/an/a10.1002/deo2.153Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective studyKeita Saito0Hironobu Nagumo1Takashi Ashikawa2Tomoyuki Funato3So Nakaji4Hiroki Matsui5Department of Gastroenterology Kameda General Hospital JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology Kameda General Hospital JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology Kameda General Hospital JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology Kameda General Hospital JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology Kameda General Hospital JapanDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine University of Tokyo Tokyo JapanAbstract Objectives In July 2017, supplementary guidelines on anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants, were published in Japan. We investigated the changes in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric mucosal lesions after the publication of the supplement, examined the risk factors, and developed a predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding. Methods We included 2272 gastric ESD cases from our hospital between May 2003 and June 2021 and classified them into two groups: 1789 cases before and 483 after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. A predictive model for post‐ESD bleeding was developed using the pre‐publication cohort data. Results The proportion of patients receiving warfarin decreased (5.0% vs. 1.4%) and those receiving direct oral anticoagulants increased (1.2% vs. 6.8%) after the publication of the supplementary guidelines. Post‐ESD bleeding occurred in 61 patients, but there was no significant difference in the bleeding rate between the groups (50 [2.8%] vs. 11 [2.3%] patients, respectively). Five risk factors (number of antithrombotic agents, dialysis, heparin replacement, resection specimen size, and procedure time) were identified for model development. The C‐statistic for the model and post‐publication cohorts were 0.83 and 0.72, respectively. In the model, each risk factor for postoperative bleeding was scored, and the risk was classified into three levels according to the total score. Bleeding rates at low, intermediate, and high risks were 1.6%, 10.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. Conclusion Despite changes in patient characteristics and clinical practice regarding ESD before and after the publication of the supplementary guidelines, we could still develop a simple and useful predictive model.https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.153anticoagulantsantithrombotic agentsbleedingendoscopic submucosal dissectionrisk factors
spellingShingle Keita Saito
Hironobu Nagumo
Takashi Ashikawa
Tomoyuki Funato
So Nakaji
Hiroki Matsui
Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
DEN Open
anticoagulants
antithrombotic agents
bleeding
endoscopic submucosal dissection
risk factors
title Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_full Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_fullStr Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_short Predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines: A single‐center retrospective study
title_sort predictive model for bleeding after gastric submucosal dissection before and after guidelines a single center retrospective study
topic anticoagulants
antithrombotic agents
bleeding
endoscopic submucosal dissection
risk factors
url https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.153
work_keys_str_mv AT keitasaito predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT hironobunagumo predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT takashiashikawa predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT tomoyukifunato predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT sonakaji predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT hirokimatsui predictivemodelforbleedingaftergastricsubmucosaldissectionbeforeandafterguidelinesasinglecenterretrospectivestudy