Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites

Geoconservation outcomes are hindered by highly subjective and conflicting criteria, varying assessment objectives, disparities in geoconservation strategy steps and the inadequate capturing and representation of geological data in dynamically changing inventories. Review shows that geoconservation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jake Crisp, Joanna Ellison, Andrew Fischer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OICC Press 2022-06-01
Series:Geoconservation Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://gcr.isfahan.iau.ir/article_685713_01f4df1105aa2920642c63438eec325d.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568710716456960
author Jake Crisp
Joanna Ellison
Andrew Fischer
author_facet Jake Crisp
Joanna Ellison
Andrew Fischer
author_sort Jake Crisp
collection DOAJ
description Geoconservation outcomes are hindered by highly subjective and conflicting criteria, varying assessment objectives, disparities in geoconservation strategy steps and the inadequate capturing and representation of geological data in dynamically changing inventories. Review shows that geoconservation outcomes are further hindered by the exclusion of quantitative geodiversity assessment from geoconservation strategies. A geoconservation toolkit is presented using the ArcGIS mobile apps QuickCapture, Survey123 and Explorer to consolidate the steps in achieving geoconservation outcomes. The toolkit closed the theoretical gap between geodiversity assessment and geoconservation strategies and attenuated the discrepancies in geoconservation strategy protocols. Preliminary research suggests the inclusion of geodiversity in geoconservation strategies will benefit geoconservation outcomes by providing scholars with a proxy to predict inventorying and geoheritage values, conservation exigencies and site complexity. The toolkit consolidated separate geoconservation strategies by unifying individual steps into one distinctive process leading to streamlined inventorying, geodiversity and geoheritage assessment. ArcGIS QuickCapture facilitated challenges in managing dynamically changing inventories by providing a fast and streamlined approach to the capturing of geodiversity information and locations. ArcGIS Survey123 facilitated the amalgamation of steps in geodiversity and geoheritage assessment and inventorying. ArcGIS Survey123 also facilitated the introduction of a suitability analysis tool to objectively manage and select existing geoheritage and inventorying criteria. Subsequent research would augment this study and its findings by determining whether statistical correlations exist between geodiversity and associated inventory and geoheritage values. Ensuing research would then seek expert advice on the standardisation of which strategies, criteria, methodologies, and processes to include in an all-encompassing third-party mobile GIS application to complement the toolkit concept in this study.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ae440c24bfd4497a225d658ab0af631
institution Kabale University
issn 2645-4661
2588-7343
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher OICC Press
record_format Article
series Geoconservation Research
spelling doaj-art-6ae440c24bfd4497a225d658ab0af6312025-02-03T00:39:24ZengOICC PressGeoconservation Research2645-46612588-73432022-06-015112810.30486/gcr.2021.1920096.1079685713Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation SitesJake Crisp0Joanna Ellison1Andrew Fischer2School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Science, University of Tasmania, AustraliaSchool of Geography, Planning and Spatial Science, University of Tasmania, AustraliaInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies Ecology and Biodiversity Centre, University of Tasmania, AustraliaGeoconservation outcomes are hindered by highly subjective and conflicting criteria, varying assessment objectives, disparities in geoconservation strategy steps and the inadequate capturing and representation of geological data in dynamically changing inventories. Review shows that geoconservation outcomes are further hindered by the exclusion of quantitative geodiversity assessment from geoconservation strategies. A geoconservation toolkit is presented using the ArcGIS mobile apps QuickCapture, Survey123 and Explorer to consolidate the steps in achieving geoconservation outcomes. The toolkit closed the theoretical gap between geodiversity assessment and geoconservation strategies and attenuated the discrepancies in geoconservation strategy protocols. Preliminary research suggests the inclusion of geodiversity in geoconservation strategies will benefit geoconservation outcomes by providing scholars with a proxy to predict inventorying and geoheritage values, conservation exigencies and site complexity. The toolkit consolidated separate geoconservation strategies by unifying individual steps into one distinctive process leading to streamlined inventorying, geodiversity and geoheritage assessment. ArcGIS QuickCapture facilitated challenges in managing dynamically changing inventories by providing a fast and streamlined approach to the capturing of geodiversity information and locations. ArcGIS Survey123 facilitated the amalgamation of steps in geodiversity and geoheritage assessment and inventorying. ArcGIS Survey123 also facilitated the introduction of a suitability analysis tool to objectively manage and select existing geoheritage and inventorying criteria. Subsequent research would augment this study and its findings by determining whether statistical correlations exist between geodiversity and associated inventory and geoheritage values. Ensuing research would then seek expert advice on the standardisation of which strategies, criteria, methodologies, and processes to include in an all-encompassing third-party mobile GIS application to complement the toolkit concept in this study.https://gcr.isfahan.iau.ir/article_685713_01f4df1105aa2920642c63438eec325d.pdfgeodiversitygeoheritageassessmentgisgeoconservationconsolidate
spellingShingle Jake Crisp
Joanna Ellison
Andrew Fischer
Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
Geoconservation Research
geodiversity
geoheritage
assessment
gis
geoconservation
consolidate
title Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
title_full Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
title_fullStr Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
title_full_unstemmed Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
title_short Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
title_sort digital coalescence and consolidated geoconservation outcomes a case study using arcgis mobile applications at tasmanian coastal geoconservation sites
topic geodiversity
geoheritage
assessment
gis
geoconservation
consolidate
url https://gcr.isfahan.iau.ir/article_685713_01f4df1105aa2920642c63438eec325d.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jakecrisp digitalcoalescenceandconsolidatedgeoconservationoutcomesacasestudyusingarcgismobileapplicationsattasmaniancoastalgeoconservationsites
AT joannaellison digitalcoalescenceandconsolidatedgeoconservationoutcomesacasestudyusingarcgismobileapplicationsattasmaniancoastalgeoconservationsites
AT andrewfischer digitalcoalescenceandconsolidatedgeoconservationoutcomesacasestudyusingarcgismobileapplicationsattasmaniancoastalgeoconservationsites