Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2
<p>Understanding regional climate model (RCM) capabilities to simulate current climate informs model development and climate change assessments. This is the first evaluation of the NARCliM2.0 ensemble of seven Weather Forecasting and Research RCMs driven by ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) over Aust...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
| Online Access: | https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/18/703/2025/gmd-18-703-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825206625779056640 |
|---|---|
| author | G. Di Virgilio G. Di Virgilio F. Ji F. Ji E. Tam J. P. Evans J. P. Evans J. Kala J. Andrys C. Thomas D. Choudhury C. Rocha Y. Li M. L. Riley |
| author_facet | G. Di Virgilio G. Di Virgilio F. Ji F. Ji E. Tam J. P. Evans J. P. Evans J. Kala J. Andrys C. Thomas D. Choudhury C. Rocha Y. Li M. L. Riley |
| author_sort | G. Di Virgilio |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Understanding regional climate model (RCM) capabilities to simulate current climate informs model development and climate change assessments. This is the first evaluation of the NARCliM2.0 ensemble of seven Weather Forecasting and Research RCMs driven by ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) over Australia at 20 km resolution contributing to CORDEX-CMIP6 Australasia and southeastern Australia at convection-permitting resolution (4 km). The performances of these seven ERA5 RCMs (R1–R7) in simulating mean and extreme maximum and minimum temperatures and precipitation are evaluated against observations at annual, seasonal, and daily timescales and compared to corresponding performances of previous-generation CORDEX-CMIP5 Australasia ERA-Interim-driven RCMs. ERA5 RCMs substantially reduce cold biases for mean and extreme maximum temperature versus ERA-Interim RCMs, with the best-performing ERA5 RCMs showing small mean absolute biases (ERA5-R5: 0.54 K; ERA5-R1: 0.81 K, respectively) but produce no improvements for minimum temperature. At 20 km resolution, improvements in mean and extreme precipitation for ERA5 RCMs versus ERA-Interim RCMs are principally evident over southeastern Australia, whereas strong biases remain over northern Australia. At convection-permitting scale over southeastern Australia, mean absolute biases for mean precipitation for the ERA5 RCM ensemble are around 79 % smaller versus the ERA-Interim RCMs that simulate for this region. Although ERA5 reanalysis data confer improvements over ERA-Interim, only improvements in precipitation simulation by ERA5 RCMs are attributable to the ERA5 driving data, with RCM improvements for maximum temperature being more attributable to model design choices, suggesting improved driving data do not guarantee all RCM performance improvements, with potential implications for CMIP6-forced dynamical downscaling. This evaluation shows that NARCliM2.0 ERA5 RCMs provide valuable reference simulations for upcoming CMIP6-forced downscaling over CORDEX-Australasia and are informative datasets for climate impact studies. Using a subset of these RCMs for simulating CMIP6-forced climate projections over CORDEX-Australasia and/or at convection-permitting scales could yield tangible benefits in simulating regional climate.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6ac63b9f41a645f0bb0183ebbb95c5ee |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1991-959X 1991-9603 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Geoscientific Model Development |
| spelling | doaj-art-6ac63b9f41a645f0bb0183ebbb95c5ee2025-02-07T08:09:15ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032025-02-011870372410.5194/gmd-18-703-2025Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2G. Di Virgilio0G. Di Virgilio1F. Ji2F. Ji3E. Tam4J. P. Evans5J. P. Evans6J. Kala7J. Andrys8C. Thomas9D. Choudhury10C. Rocha11Y. Li12M. L. Riley13Climate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, AustraliaClimate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaClimate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, AustraliaAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaClimate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, AustraliaClimate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Harry Butler Institute, Centre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, AustraliaEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Harry Butler Institute, Centre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, AustraliaClimate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaClimate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, AustraliaClimate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, AustraliaClimate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, AustraliaClimate & Atmospheric Science, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Sydney, Australia<p>Understanding regional climate model (RCM) capabilities to simulate current climate informs model development and climate change assessments. This is the first evaluation of the NARCliM2.0 ensemble of seven Weather Forecasting and Research RCMs driven by ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) over Australia at 20 km resolution contributing to CORDEX-CMIP6 Australasia and southeastern Australia at convection-permitting resolution (4 km). The performances of these seven ERA5 RCMs (R1–R7) in simulating mean and extreme maximum and minimum temperatures and precipitation are evaluated against observations at annual, seasonal, and daily timescales and compared to corresponding performances of previous-generation CORDEX-CMIP5 Australasia ERA-Interim-driven RCMs. ERA5 RCMs substantially reduce cold biases for mean and extreme maximum temperature versus ERA-Interim RCMs, with the best-performing ERA5 RCMs showing small mean absolute biases (ERA5-R5: 0.54 K; ERA5-R1: 0.81 K, respectively) but produce no improvements for minimum temperature. At 20 km resolution, improvements in mean and extreme precipitation for ERA5 RCMs versus ERA-Interim RCMs are principally evident over southeastern Australia, whereas strong biases remain over northern Australia. At convection-permitting scale over southeastern Australia, mean absolute biases for mean precipitation for the ERA5 RCM ensemble are around 79 % smaller versus the ERA-Interim RCMs that simulate for this region. Although ERA5 reanalysis data confer improvements over ERA-Interim, only improvements in precipitation simulation by ERA5 RCMs are attributable to the ERA5 driving data, with RCM improvements for maximum temperature being more attributable to model design choices, suggesting improved driving data do not guarantee all RCM performance improvements, with potential implications for CMIP6-forced dynamical downscaling. This evaluation shows that NARCliM2.0 ERA5 RCMs provide valuable reference simulations for upcoming CMIP6-forced downscaling over CORDEX-Australasia and are informative datasets for climate impact studies. Using a subset of these RCMs for simulating CMIP6-forced climate projections over CORDEX-Australasia and/or at convection-permitting scales could yield tangible benefits in simulating regional climate.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/18/703/2025/gmd-18-703-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | G. Di Virgilio G. Di Virgilio F. Ji F. Ji E. Tam J. P. Evans J. P. Evans J. Kala J. Andrys C. Thomas D. Choudhury C. Rocha Y. Li M. L. Riley Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2 Geoscientific Model Development |
| title | Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2 |
| title_full | Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2 |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2 |
| title_short | Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2 |
| title_sort | evaluation of cordex era5 forced narclim2 0 regional climate models over australia using the weather research and forecasting wrf model version 4 1 2 |
| url | https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/18/703/2025/gmd-18-703-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gdivirgilio evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT gdivirgilio evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT fji evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT fji evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT etam evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT jpevans evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT jpevans evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT jkala evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT jandrys evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT cthomas evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT dchoudhury evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT crocha evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT yli evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 AT mlriley evaluationofcordexera5forcednarclim20regionalclimatemodelsoveraustraliausingtheweatherresearchandforecastingwrfmodelversion412 |