Broken Promises? NAFTA, Immigration, and ‘Shadow’ Regionalism
The reduction of immigration was never an official objective of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Yet, it was generally supposed to be one of its long-term consequences. Fifteen years later, Mexican immigration to the United States has in fact increased. The agreement has failed to reduce the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Fanny Lauby |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institut des Amériques
2011-08-01
|
| Series: | IdeAs |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ideas/156 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Immigration Trends After 20 Years of NAFTA
by: Mónica Verea
Published: (2014-12-01) -
The Institutions of NAFTA
by: Greg Anderson
Published: (2010-03-01) -
US-MEXICAN RELATIONS: FROM NAFTA TO NAFTA 2:0
by: T. V. Kashirina
Published: (2022-02-01) -
NAFTA and Federalism: Are They Compatible?
by: G. Alan Tarr
Published: (2010-03-01) -
The Cost of Broken Promises or How Policy Failure Can Help Win Elections - Immigration and the 2015 UK General Election
by: James Hampshire
Published: (2015-12-01)