Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare semilunar vestibular incision technique with pouch and tunnel technique in combination with A-PRF and L-PRF for treatment of Miller’s class I and II multiple gingival recessions. Method: This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, split mouth study whic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2018-07-01
|
| Series: | Saudi Dental Journal |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218301019 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850039323254063104 |
|---|---|
| author | Shaik Sameera Medandrao Nagasri Pavuluri Aravind Kumar Pantareddy Indeevar Kalapala Raviraj S.V.V.S. Musalaiah |
| author_facet | Shaik Sameera Medandrao Nagasri Pavuluri Aravind Kumar Pantareddy Indeevar Kalapala Raviraj S.V.V.S. Musalaiah |
| author_sort | Shaik Sameera |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: The aim of this study is to compare semilunar vestibular incision technique with pouch and tunnel technique in combination with A-PRF and L-PRF for treatment of Miller’s class I and II multiple gingival recessions. Method: This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, split mouth study which consists of 16 systemically healthy patients with 96 sites and a mean age of 34.2 years, and divided randomly into 2 groups, Group A consists of semilunar vestibular incision technique sandwiched with A-PRF and L-PRF and Group B consists of Pouch and tunnel technique sandwiched with A-PRF and L-PRF. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 6 months which include plaque index, gingival index, recession depth, recession width, clinical attachment loss and width of keratinized tissue. Results: All the clinical parameters showed significantly better levels for both the groups from baseline to 6 months. Semilunar vestibular incision technique showed greater significance when compared to pouch and tunnel technique from baseline to 6 months post operatively. Conclusion: The combination of A-PRF and L-PRF with pouch and tunnel technique and semilunar vestibular technique showed better outcome 6 months post operatively. Semilunar vestibular incision technique showed promising results than pouch and tunnel technique for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Keywords: Gingival recession, Semilunar vestibular incision technique, Pouch and tunnel technique, A-PRF, L-PRF |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6a566901c6a14702b4e66c90ec3dc2ce |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1013-9052 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-07-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Saudi Dental Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-6a566901c6a14702b4e66c90ec3dc2ce2025-08-20T02:56:23ZengSpringerSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522018-07-0130318318910.1016/j.sdentj.2018.03.002Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRFShaik Sameera0Medandrao Nagasri1Pavuluri Aravind Kumar2Pantareddy Indeevar3Kalapala Raviraj4S.V.V.S. Musalaiah5Corresponding author.; Department of Periodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, IndiaDepartment of Periodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, IndiaDepartment of Periodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, IndiaDepartment of Periodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, IndiaDepartment of Periodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, IndiaDepartment of Periodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, IndiaAim: The aim of this study is to compare semilunar vestibular incision technique with pouch and tunnel technique in combination with A-PRF and L-PRF for treatment of Miller’s class I and II multiple gingival recessions. Method: This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, split mouth study which consists of 16 systemically healthy patients with 96 sites and a mean age of 34.2 years, and divided randomly into 2 groups, Group A consists of semilunar vestibular incision technique sandwiched with A-PRF and L-PRF and Group B consists of Pouch and tunnel technique sandwiched with A-PRF and L-PRF. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 6 months which include plaque index, gingival index, recession depth, recession width, clinical attachment loss and width of keratinized tissue. Results: All the clinical parameters showed significantly better levels for both the groups from baseline to 6 months. Semilunar vestibular incision technique showed greater significance when compared to pouch and tunnel technique from baseline to 6 months post operatively. Conclusion: The combination of A-PRF and L-PRF with pouch and tunnel technique and semilunar vestibular technique showed better outcome 6 months post operatively. Semilunar vestibular incision technique showed promising results than pouch and tunnel technique for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Keywords: Gingival recession, Semilunar vestibular incision technique, Pouch and tunnel technique, A-PRF, L-PRFhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218301019 |
| spellingShingle | Shaik Sameera Medandrao Nagasri Pavuluri Aravind Kumar Pantareddy Indeevar Kalapala Raviraj S.V.V.S. Musalaiah Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF Saudi Dental Journal |
| title | Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF |
| title_full | Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF |
| title_short | Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of A-PRF and L-PRF |
| title_sort | comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions sandwiched with a combination of a prf and l prf |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218301019 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shaiksameera comparisonoftwosurgicaltechniquesinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionssandwichedwithacombinationofaprfandlprf AT medandraonagasri comparisonoftwosurgicaltechniquesinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionssandwichedwithacombinationofaprfandlprf AT pavuluriaravindkumar comparisonoftwosurgicaltechniquesinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionssandwichedwithacombinationofaprfandlprf AT pantareddyindeevar comparisonoftwosurgicaltechniquesinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionssandwichedwithacombinationofaprfandlprf AT kalapalaraviraj comparisonoftwosurgicaltechniquesinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionssandwichedwithacombinationofaprfandlprf AT svvsmusalaiah comparisonoftwosurgicaltechniquesinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionssandwichedwithacombinationofaprfandlprf |