Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study

Anthropogenic climate change and urbanization have resulted in increasing needs to provide public health protection from the hazards of elevated PM _2.5 , elevated ozone and extreme heat (or cold) to the public. This is a particularly urgent issue for sensitive groups that are most subject to these...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel L Mendoza, Erik T Crosman, Corbin Anderson, Mamta Chaudhari, Shawn A Gonzales
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:Environmental Research: Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ada792
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841525543977091072
author Daniel L Mendoza
Erik T Crosman
Corbin Anderson
Mamta Chaudhari
Shawn A Gonzales
author_facet Daniel L Mendoza
Erik T Crosman
Corbin Anderson
Mamta Chaudhari
Shawn A Gonzales
author_sort Daniel L Mendoza
collection DOAJ
description Anthropogenic climate change and urbanization have resulted in increasing needs to provide public health protection from the hazards of elevated PM _2.5 , elevated ozone and extreme heat (or cold) to the public. This is a particularly urgent issue for sensitive groups that are most subject to these hazards, such as the elderly, children, health compromised, and homeless populations. In this study, we compare the indoor versus outdoor temperature and air pollution levels between 17 May 2022 and 31 October 2023 in Salt Lake City, Utah at an older (Northwest Recreation Center) and newer building (Northwest Community Center). Differences between indoor and outdoor ozone were pronounced, with mean indoor ozone being generally ∼40% of outdoor values. Indoor PM _2.5 concentrations compared to outdoor value show seasonal variability and were up to 200% higher during wildfires compared to indoor concentration during wintertime inversion events. We found that the older building was less protective against ozone and wildfire PM _2.5 pollution than the newer building. Future research could focus on characterizing and quantifying the impact of building age, insulation, and mechanical ventilation on indoor pollutant migration and separate these factors from human activity.
format Article
id doaj-art-6a31c4b952d742519671b260e158e431
institution Kabale University
issn 2752-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research: Health
spelling doaj-art-6a31c4b952d742519671b260e158e4312025-01-17T09:29:48ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research: Health2752-53092025-01-013101501010.1088/2752-5309/ada792Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case studyDaniel L Mendoza0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-7362Erik T Crosman1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-384XCorbin Anderson2Mamta Chaudhari3Shawn A Gonzales4https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9973-6324Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah , 135 S 1460 E, Room 819, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America; Pulmonary Division, School of Medicine, University of Utah , 26 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States of America; Department of City & Metropolitan Planning, University of Utah , 375 S 1530 E, Suite 220, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of AmericaDepartment of Life, Earth and Environmental Sciences, West Texas A&M University , Natural Sciences Building 348A, Canyon, TX 79016, United States of AmericaSalt Lake County Health Department, Air Quality Bureau , Environmental Health Division, 788 E Woodoak Lane, Murray, UT 84107, United States of AmericaSalt Lake County Health Department, Air Quality Bureau , Environmental Health Division, 788 E Woodoak Lane, Murray, UT 84107, United States of AmericaSalt Lake County Health Department, Air Quality Bureau , Environmental Health Division, 788 E Woodoak Lane, Murray, UT 84107, United States of AmericaAnthropogenic climate change and urbanization have resulted in increasing needs to provide public health protection from the hazards of elevated PM _2.5 , elevated ozone and extreme heat (or cold) to the public. This is a particularly urgent issue for sensitive groups that are most subject to these hazards, such as the elderly, children, health compromised, and homeless populations. In this study, we compare the indoor versus outdoor temperature and air pollution levels between 17 May 2022 and 31 October 2023 in Salt Lake City, Utah at an older (Northwest Recreation Center) and newer building (Northwest Community Center). Differences between indoor and outdoor ozone were pronounced, with mean indoor ozone being generally ∼40% of outdoor values. Indoor PM _2.5 concentrations compared to outdoor value show seasonal variability and were up to 200% higher during wildfires compared to indoor concentration during wintertime inversion events. We found that the older building was less protective against ozone and wildfire PM _2.5 pollution than the newer building. Future research could focus on characterizing and quantifying the impact of building age, insulation, and mechanical ventilation on indoor pollutant migration and separate these factors from human activity.https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ada792indoor air qualitycooling centersozoneparticulate matterheat wavesprotective breathing zones
spellingShingle Daniel L Mendoza
Erik T Crosman
Corbin Anderson
Mamta Chaudhari
Shawn A Gonzales
Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study
Environmental Research: Health
indoor air quality
cooling centers
ozone
particulate matter
heat waves
protective breathing zones
title Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study
title_full Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study
title_fullStr Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study
title_short Comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center: a multiyear case study
title_sort comparing indoor and outdoor temperature and air pollution at an urban cooling center a multiyear case study
topic indoor air quality
cooling centers
ozone
particulate matter
heat waves
protective breathing zones
url https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ada792
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellmendoza comparingindoorandoutdoortemperatureandairpollutionatanurbancoolingcenteramultiyearcasestudy
AT eriktcrosman comparingindoorandoutdoortemperatureandairpollutionatanurbancoolingcenteramultiyearcasestudy
AT corbinanderson comparingindoorandoutdoortemperatureandairpollutionatanurbancoolingcenteramultiyearcasestudy
AT mamtachaudhari comparingindoorandoutdoortemperatureandairpollutionatanurbancoolingcenteramultiyearcasestudy
AT shawnagonzales comparingindoorandoutdoortemperatureandairpollutionatanurbancoolingcenteramultiyearcasestudy