Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations
Political risk analysis emerged as a distinctive field within applied international studies at the height of the Cold War but recently it has received a new impetus. It was preconditioned by an increasing uncertainty in many segments of world politics after a series of powerful ‘strategic shocks’ (‘...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow University Press
2020-11-01
|
| Series: | Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/78 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832572205343440896 |
|---|---|
| author | D. A. Nechkin |
| author_facet | D. A. Nechkin |
| author_sort | D. A. Nechkin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Political risk analysis emerged as a distinctive field within applied international studies at the height of the Cold War but recently it has received a new impetus. It was preconditioned by an increasing uncertainty in many segments of world politics after a series of powerful ‘strategic shocks’ (‘Arab Awakening’, ‘Ukrainian crisis’, Brexit etc.) which brought about substantial and often completely unforeseen, direct and indirect consequences for the international business activities all over the world. This paper examines both classical approaches to defining political risk, which were elaborated by the leading experts in this field in the 1970–1980s, and its contemporary interpretations proposed in academic literature, and reports of think tanks and consultancies over the last decade. The author outlines a new classification of the main definitions of political risks, based on the factors that affect a company, be it the host government’s actions, sanctions or a general destabilization of the business environment as a result of certain political events. The paper identifies the key drivers behind the development of contemporary approaches to defining political risks, including an increasing influence of non-governmental actors, destabilizing processes in certain developed countries, etc. The author shows that these factors have broadened the concept by reinterpreting what generates political risks, in what circumstances and what impact they have on a risk bearer (a foreign company). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6a276f93f81b4055a081adbb82ed6122 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2076-7404 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
| publisher | Moscow University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика |
| spelling | doaj-art-6a276f93f81b4055a081adbb82ed61222025-02-02T11:10:31ZengMoscow University PressВестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика2076-74042020-11-0110410913777Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary InterpretationsD. A. Nechkin0Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityPolitical risk analysis emerged as a distinctive field within applied international studies at the height of the Cold War but recently it has received a new impetus. It was preconditioned by an increasing uncertainty in many segments of world politics after a series of powerful ‘strategic shocks’ (‘Arab Awakening’, ‘Ukrainian crisis’, Brexit etc.) which brought about substantial and often completely unforeseen, direct and indirect consequences for the international business activities all over the world. This paper examines both classical approaches to defining political risk, which were elaborated by the leading experts in this field in the 1970–1980s, and its contemporary interpretations proposed in academic literature, and reports of think tanks and consultancies over the last decade. The author outlines a new classification of the main definitions of political risks, based on the factors that affect a company, be it the host government’s actions, sanctions or a general destabilization of the business environment as a result of certain political events. The paper identifies the key drivers behind the development of contemporary approaches to defining political risks, including an increasing influence of non-governmental actors, destabilizing processes in certain developed countries, etc. The author shows that these factors have broadened the concept by reinterpreting what generates political risks, in what circumstances and what impact they have on a risk bearer (a foreign company).https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/78political riskscountry risksforeign investorsinternational businesspolitical environmenthost countrycountry of origininvestmentsanctionsprotectionism |
| spellingShingle | D. A. Nechkin Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика political risks country risks foreign investors international business political environment host country country of origin investment sanctions protectionism |
| title | Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations |
| title_full | Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations |
| title_fullStr | Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations |
| title_short | Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations |
| title_sort | evolution of political risk concept classical and contemporary interpretations |
| topic | political risks country risks foreign investors international business political environment host country country of origin investment sanctions protectionism |
| url | https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/78 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danechkin evolutionofpoliticalriskconceptclassicalandcontemporaryinterpretations |