A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section

Abstract Introduction The Robson Ten Group Classification System is widely used for the audit of cesarean section (CS) rates. However, CS rate alone is a poor quality indicator and should be balanced with other obstetric endpoints. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Swedish national data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Savchenko, Lars Ladfors, Linda Hjertberg, Eric Hildebrand, Sophia Brismar Wendel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-07-01
Series:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14350
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687607094542336
author Julia Savchenko
Lars Ladfors
Linda Hjertberg
Eric Hildebrand
Sophia Brismar Wendel
author_facet Julia Savchenko
Lars Ladfors
Linda Hjertberg
Eric Hildebrand
Sophia Brismar Wendel
author_sort Julia Savchenko
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The Robson Ten Group Classification System is widely used for the audit of cesarean section (CS) rates. However, CS rate alone is a poor quality indicator and should be balanced with other obstetric endpoints. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Swedish national data on obstetric outcomes other than CS, stratified by the Robson classification, could be analyzed in a useful way. Material and methods All births in Sweden from 2017 through 2020 recorded in the nationwide Swedish Pregnancy Register were categorized using the Robson classification with subdivision of some groups. Five outcomes were explored: CS, operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and Apgar score <7 at 5 minuteutes. Rates of each outcome and contribution of each group to the total outcome rate were calculated. Results The largest Robson groups were nulliparous and multiparous women with single‐term cephalic pregnancies, unscarred uterus and spontaneous labor. Intrapartum CS rates were highest for multiple pregnancies, women with induced labor after previous CS, and nulliparous women with induced labor. Nulliparous women and multiparous women with a previous CS with attempted vaginal birth had the highest operative vaginal delivery and OASIS rates. The postpartum hemorrhage rate was highest for multiple pregnancies and transverse lie, followed by prelabor CS in nulliparous and multiparous women with single‐term cephalic pregnancies and unscarred uterus. The highest rates of Apgar score <7 at 5 minute were observed in preterm deliveries, multiple pregnancies, transverse lie and breech presentation. The largest contribution to the total CS rate was made by women with previous CS delivered by prelabor CS, and nulliparous women with induced or spontaneous labor. The largest contribution to all other outcomes was made by nulliparous women with spontaneous or induced labor and, notably, multiparous women with spontaneous labor and unscarred uterus. Conclusions The Robson classification provides a useful framework for analyzing CS rates along with rates of operative vaginal delivery, OASIS, postpartum hemorrhage and low Apgar score. Parallel interpretation of several outcomes allows a systematic and multidimensional audit, helpful for families and healthcare professionals, and can be used for comparisons, assessment of trends and subpopulations.
format Article
id doaj-art-69d87f5de9f34f7e8175f33d620d49c5
institution DOAJ
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-69d87f5de9f34f7e8175f33d620d49c52025-08-20T03:22:18ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122022-07-01101782783510.1111/aogs.14350A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean sectionJulia Savchenko0Lars Ladfors1Linda Hjertberg2Eric Hildebrand3Sophia Brismar Wendel4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stockholm South General Hospital Södersjukhuset Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Vrinnevi Hospital Norrköping SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Danderyd Hospital Stockholm SwedenAbstract Introduction The Robson Ten Group Classification System is widely used for the audit of cesarean section (CS) rates. However, CS rate alone is a poor quality indicator and should be balanced with other obstetric endpoints. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Swedish national data on obstetric outcomes other than CS, stratified by the Robson classification, could be analyzed in a useful way. Material and methods All births in Sweden from 2017 through 2020 recorded in the nationwide Swedish Pregnancy Register were categorized using the Robson classification with subdivision of some groups. Five outcomes were explored: CS, operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and Apgar score <7 at 5 minuteutes. Rates of each outcome and contribution of each group to the total outcome rate were calculated. Results The largest Robson groups were nulliparous and multiparous women with single‐term cephalic pregnancies, unscarred uterus and spontaneous labor. Intrapartum CS rates were highest for multiple pregnancies, women with induced labor after previous CS, and nulliparous women with induced labor. Nulliparous women and multiparous women with a previous CS with attempted vaginal birth had the highest operative vaginal delivery and OASIS rates. The postpartum hemorrhage rate was highest for multiple pregnancies and transverse lie, followed by prelabor CS in nulliparous and multiparous women with single‐term cephalic pregnancies and unscarred uterus. The highest rates of Apgar score <7 at 5 minute were observed in preterm deliveries, multiple pregnancies, transverse lie and breech presentation. The largest contribution to the total CS rate was made by women with previous CS delivered by prelabor CS, and nulliparous women with induced or spontaneous labor. The largest contribution to all other outcomes was made by nulliparous women with spontaneous or induced labor and, notably, multiparous women with spontaneous labor and unscarred uterus. Conclusions The Robson classification provides a useful framework for analyzing CS rates along with rates of operative vaginal delivery, OASIS, postpartum hemorrhage and low Apgar score. Parallel interpretation of several outcomes allows a systematic and multidimensional audit, helpful for families and healthcare professionals, and can be used for comparisons, assessment of trends and subpopulations.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14350auditchildbirth carelaborobstetric deliveryperinatal outcomesquality indicators
spellingShingle Julia Savchenko
Lars Ladfors
Linda Hjertberg
Eric Hildebrand
Sophia Brismar Wendel
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
audit
childbirth care
labor
obstetric delivery
perinatal outcomes
quality indicators
title A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
title_full A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
title_fullStr A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
title_short A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
title_sort step towards better audit the robson ten group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section
topic audit
childbirth care
labor
obstetric delivery
perinatal outcomes
quality indicators
url https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14350
work_keys_str_mv AT juliasavchenko asteptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT larsladfors asteptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT lindahjertberg asteptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT erichildebrand asteptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT sophiabrismarwendel asteptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT juliasavchenko steptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT larsladfors steptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT lindahjertberg steptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT erichildebrand steptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection
AT sophiabrismarwendel steptowardsbetteraudittherobsontengroupclassificationsystemforoutcomesotherthancesareansection