The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"

The paper analyses the relationship between law and rhetoric and their intersection areas, particularly focusing on the significance of rhetoric in contemporary judicial proceedings. In the 20th century, the issue of the relationship between law and rhetoric (explicitly or implicitly) became relevan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Avramović Dragutin, Jovanov Ilija
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade 2024-01-01
Series:NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2024/0354-88722403191A.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850058984577302528
author Avramović Dragutin
Jovanov Ilija
author_facet Avramović Dragutin
Jovanov Ilija
author_sort Avramović Dragutin
collection DOAJ
description The paper analyses the relationship between law and rhetoric and their intersection areas, particularly focusing on the significance of rhetoric in contemporary judicial proceedings. In the 20th century, the issue of the relationship between law and rhetoric (explicitly or implicitly) became relevant particularly through the scientific excellence of the school of American legal realism , but more recently, it has been somewhat neglected. The authors of this paper devote particular attention to the judicial decision-making theory of Jerome Frank, a prominent legal realist. It is for his radical positions, as a fact sceptic, that he seems to have unconsciously, subtly but persistently, woven into his works the idea of the importance of rhetoric in judicial decision-making processes. The authors explore the reasons behind Frank's hesitation for most of his scientific career to give rhetoric (particularly that of Aristotle, which he quoted most) its deserved place. It was only in one of his later works that Frank attempted to build a bridge between his judicial decision-making theory (insisting on the importance of prejudices and subjectivities of a judge to the judicial decision) and rhetoric (aimed at persuading the judge, evoking his emotions, and creating the image of a particular reality in his eyes). It seems that his effort was only a partial success because, even then, he primarily focused on the methods of touching the "souls of the audience", overlooking the importance of the rhetorical means (primarily logical) that did not lend support for his theory.
format Article
id doaj-art-69aa70ac4bd34912bd6f0fe2dd0cf869
institution DOAJ
issn 0354-8872
2620-0406
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade
record_format Article
series NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
spelling doaj-art-69aa70ac4bd34912bd6f0fe2dd0cf8692025-08-20T02:51:00ZengUniversity of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, BelgradeNBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija0354-88722620-04062024-01-0129319120110.5937/nabepo29-515820354-88722403191AThe Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"Avramović Dragutin0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3383-4346Jovanov Ilija1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1582-7102University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, SerbiaThe paper analyses the relationship between law and rhetoric and their intersection areas, particularly focusing on the significance of rhetoric in contemporary judicial proceedings. In the 20th century, the issue of the relationship between law and rhetoric (explicitly or implicitly) became relevant particularly through the scientific excellence of the school of American legal realism , but more recently, it has been somewhat neglected. The authors of this paper devote particular attention to the judicial decision-making theory of Jerome Frank, a prominent legal realist. It is for his radical positions, as a fact sceptic, that he seems to have unconsciously, subtly but persistently, woven into his works the idea of the importance of rhetoric in judicial decision-making processes. The authors explore the reasons behind Frank's hesitation for most of his scientific career to give rhetoric (particularly that of Aristotle, which he quoted most) its deserved place. It was only in one of his later works that Frank attempted to build a bridge between his judicial decision-making theory (insisting on the importance of prejudices and subjectivities of a judge to the judicial decision) and rhetoric (aimed at persuading the judge, evoking his emotions, and creating the image of a particular reality in his eyes). It seems that his effort was only a partial success because, even then, he primarily focused on the methods of touching the "souls of the audience", overlooking the importance of the rhetorical means (primarily logical) that did not lend support for his theory.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2024/0354-88722403191A.pdfjerome frankdigestive jurisprudencerhetoricaristotle
spellingShingle Avramović Dragutin
Jovanov Ilija
The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
jerome frank
digestive jurisprudence
rhetoric
aristotle
title The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
title_full The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
title_fullStr The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
title_short The Impact of rhetoric on Jerome Frank's "Digestive jurisprudence"
title_sort impact of rhetoric on jerome frank s digestive jurisprudence
topic jerome frank
digestive jurisprudence
rhetoric
aristotle
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2024/0354-88722403191A.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT avramovicdragutin theimpactofrhetoriconjeromefranksdigestivejurisprudence
AT jovanovilija theimpactofrhetoriconjeromefranksdigestivejurisprudence
AT avramovicdragutin impactofrhetoriconjeromefranksdigestivejurisprudence
AT jovanovilija impactofrhetoriconjeromefranksdigestivejurisprudence