Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions
In this essay, we advance a conversation initiated on these pages by the recent special issue on “Flourishing and Health in Critical Perspective: An Invitation to Interdisciplinary Dialogue” (Willen, 2022; Willen, Williamson, and Walsh 2022), followed by a response from VanderWeele and the Human Flo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | SSM - Mental Health |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000823 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832590886929694720 |
|---|---|
| author | Sarah S. Willen Abigail Fisher Williamson Colleen C. Walsh |
| author_facet | Sarah S. Willen Abigail Fisher Williamson Colleen C. Walsh |
| author_sort | Sarah S. Willen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this essay, we advance a conversation initiated on these pages by the recent special issue on “Flourishing and Health in Critical Perspective: An Invitation to Interdisciplinary Dialogue” (Willen, 2022; Willen, Williamson, and Walsh 2022), followed by a response from VanderWeele and the Human Flourishing Program team (VanderWeele et al., 2023). We were pleased to learn of their agreement with several of the concerns we raised — among them the need for more qualitative inquiry into flourishing; greater attention to sociocultural differences; and additional consideration of the impact of structural conditions, power dynamics, and legacies of injustice on opportunities to flourish. Yet significant disagreements persist. In this rejoinder, we clarify a foundational concern that precipitated our initial call for critical dialogue: the entanglement of normative religious values and empirical methods in HFP’s work. This concern becomes even more evident in VanderWeele and colleagues’ published response and more recent work. This essay highlights the normative theological commitments that inform HFP’s measures and findings, and it foregrounds the risks of introducing theological views into the design and conduct of social scientific research. If religious commitments shape concept formulation and measurement, then those commitments will inevitably influence the findings and policy recommendations that result. Researchers, policymakers, public health professionals, and others interested in engaging with HFP’s instruments, findings, and recommendations need to be aware of the context of their emergence as well as the normative assumptions upon which they rest. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-69a57ce524ad400db345ac6fedfa50e1 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2666-5603 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | SSM - Mental Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-69a57ce524ad400db345ac6fedfa50e12025-01-23T05:27:49ZengElsevierSSM - Mental Health2666-56032025-06-017100377Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptionsSarah S. Willen0Abigail Fisher Williamson1Colleen C. Walsh2Department of Anthropology and Research Program on Global Health and Human Rights at the Gladstein Family Human Rights Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Corresponding author. Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Rd., U-1176, Storrs, CT, 06269-1176, USA.Departments of Political Science and Public Policy & Law, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, USADepartment of Health Sciences and Human Performance, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USAIn this essay, we advance a conversation initiated on these pages by the recent special issue on “Flourishing and Health in Critical Perspective: An Invitation to Interdisciplinary Dialogue” (Willen, 2022; Willen, Williamson, and Walsh 2022), followed by a response from VanderWeele and the Human Flourishing Program team (VanderWeele et al., 2023). We were pleased to learn of their agreement with several of the concerns we raised — among them the need for more qualitative inquiry into flourishing; greater attention to sociocultural differences; and additional consideration of the impact of structural conditions, power dynamics, and legacies of injustice on opportunities to flourish. Yet significant disagreements persist. In this rejoinder, we clarify a foundational concern that precipitated our initial call for critical dialogue: the entanglement of normative religious values and empirical methods in HFP’s work. This concern becomes even more evident in VanderWeele and colleagues’ published response and more recent work. This essay highlights the normative theological commitments that inform HFP’s measures and findings, and it foregrounds the risks of introducing theological views into the design and conduct of social scientific research. If religious commitments shape concept formulation and measurement, then those commitments will inevitably influence the findings and policy recommendations that result. Researchers, policymakers, public health professionals, and others interested in engaging with HFP’s instruments, findings, and recommendations need to be aware of the context of their emergence as well as the normative assumptions upon which they rest.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000823 |
| spellingShingle | Sarah S. Willen Abigail Fisher Williamson Colleen C. Walsh Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions SSM - Mental Health |
| title | Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions |
| title_full | Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions |
| title_fullStr | Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions |
| title_short | Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions |
| title_sort | who gets to define flourishing disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000823 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahswillen whogetstodefineflourishingdisentanglingsocialsciencefromtheologyinflourishingmeasurementandpolicyprescriptions AT abigailfisherwilliamson whogetstodefineflourishingdisentanglingsocialsciencefromtheologyinflourishingmeasurementandpolicyprescriptions AT colleencwalsh whogetstodefineflourishingdisentanglingsocialsciencefromtheologyinflourishingmeasurementandpolicyprescriptions |