Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study
Abstract BackgroundPneumoconiosis prevalence is increasing in the United States, especially among coal miners. Contemporaneously with an increased need for specialized multidisciplinary care for miners, there is a shortage of experts to fulfill this need. Miners’ Wellness ECHO...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Formative Research |
| Online Access: | https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e67999 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850056283944648704 |
|---|---|
| author | Varinn Avi Sood Heidi Rishel Brakey Orrin Myers Xin Shore Akshay Sood |
| author_facet | Varinn Avi Sood Heidi Rishel Brakey Orrin Myers Xin Shore Akshay Sood |
| author_sort | Varinn Avi Sood |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Abstract
BackgroundPneumoconiosis prevalence is increasing in the United States, especially among coal miners. Contemporaneously with an increased need for specialized multidisciplinary care for miners, there is a shortage of experts to fulfill this need. Miners’ Wellness ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes) is a digital community of practice based on interprofessional discussion for knowledge transfer. The program has been demonstrated to increase participants’ self-efficacy for clinical, medicolegal, and “soft” skills related to miners’ health.
ObjectiveWe aimed to examine characteristics associated with interprofessional discussions and suggest ways to strengthen knowledge transfer.
MethodsThis mixed methods study used an exploratory sequential design. We video-recorded and transcribed ECHO sessions over 14 months from July 2018 to September 2019 and analyzed content to examine participant discussions. We focused on participants’ statements of expertise followed by other participants’ acceptance or eschewal of these statements (utterances). We conducted quantitative analyses to examine the associations of active participation in discussion (primary outcome variable, defined as any utterance). We analyzed the association of the outcome on the following predictors: (1) participant group status, (2) study time frame, (3) participant ECHO experience status, (4) concordance of participant group identity between presenter and participant, (5) video usage, and (6) attendance frequency. We used the generalized estimating equations approach for longitudinal data, logit link function for binary outcomes, and LSMEANS
ResultsWe studied 23 sessions with 158 unique participants and 539 total participants, averaging 23.4 (SD 5.6) participants per session. Clinical providers, the largest participant group, constituting 36.7% (n=58) of unique participants, were the most vocal group (mean 21.74, SD 2.11 average utterances per person-session). Benefits counselors were the least vocal group, with an average utterance rate of 0.57 (SD 0.29) per person-session and constituting 8.2% (n=13) of unique participants. Thus, various participant groups exhibited different utterance rates across sessions (PPPP
ConclusionsOur findings provide insight into the mechanics of interprofessional discussion in a digital community of practice managing pneumoconiosis. Our results underscore the capacity of the novel ECHO model to leverage technology and workforce diversity to facilitate interprofessional discussions on the multidisciplinary care of miners. Future research will evaluate whether this translates into improved patient outcomes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-699481b1d030451abc4aca15cbda3aa1 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2561-326X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Formative Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-699481b1d030451abc4aca15cbda3aa12025-08-20T02:51:43ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2025-03-019e67999e6799910.2196/67999Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods StudyVarinn Avi Soodhttp://orcid.org/0009-0008-4233-9164Heidi Rishel Brakeyhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-9592Orrin Myershttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6291-2027Xin Shorehttp://orcid.org/0009-0007-2363-9199Akshay Soodhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1582-8444 Abstract BackgroundPneumoconiosis prevalence is increasing in the United States, especially among coal miners. Contemporaneously with an increased need for specialized multidisciplinary care for miners, there is a shortage of experts to fulfill this need. Miners’ Wellness ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes) is a digital community of practice based on interprofessional discussion for knowledge transfer. The program has been demonstrated to increase participants’ self-efficacy for clinical, medicolegal, and “soft” skills related to miners’ health. ObjectiveWe aimed to examine characteristics associated with interprofessional discussions and suggest ways to strengthen knowledge transfer. MethodsThis mixed methods study used an exploratory sequential design. We video-recorded and transcribed ECHO sessions over 14 months from July 2018 to September 2019 and analyzed content to examine participant discussions. We focused on participants’ statements of expertise followed by other participants’ acceptance or eschewal of these statements (utterances). We conducted quantitative analyses to examine the associations of active participation in discussion (primary outcome variable, defined as any utterance). We analyzed the association of the outcome on the following predictors: (1) participant group status, (2) study time frame, (3) participant ECHO experience status, (4) concordance of participant group identity between presenter and participant, (5) video usage, and (6) attendance frequency. We used the generalized estimating equations approach for longitudinal data, logit link function for binary outcomes, and LSMEANS ResultsWe studied 23 sessions with 158 unique participants and 539 total participants, averaging 23.4 (SD 5.6) participants per session. Clinical providers, the largest participant group, constituting 36.7% (n=58) of unique participants, were the most vocal group (mean 21.74, SD 2.11 average utterances per person-session). Benefits counselors were the least vocal group, with an average utterance rate of 0.57 (SD 0.29) per person-session and constituting 8.2% (n=13) of unique participants. Thus, various participant groups exhibited different utterance rates across sessions (PPPP ConclusionsOur findings provide insight into the mechanics of interprofessional discussion in a digital community of practice managing pneumoconiosis. Our results underscore the capacity of the novel ECHO model to leverage technology and workforce diversity to facilitate interprofessional discussions on the multidisciplinary care of miners. Future research will evaluate whether this translates into improved patient outcomes.https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e67999 |
| spellingShingle | Varinn Avi Sood Heidi Rishel Brakey Orrin Myers Xin Shore Akshay Sood Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study JMIR Formative Research |
| title | Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full | Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_fullStr | Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_short | Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital “Community of Practice” for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study |
| title_sort | interprofessional discussion for knowledge transfer in a digital community of practice for managing pneumoconiosis mixed methods study |
| url | https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e67999 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT varinnavisood interprofessionaldiscussionforknowledgetransferinadigitalcommunityofpracticeformanagingpneumoconiosismixedmethodsstudy AT heidirishelbrakey interprofessionaldiscussionforknowledgetransferinadigitalcommunityofpracticeformanagingpneumoconiosismixedmethodsstudy AT orrinmyers interprofessionaldiscussionforknowledgetransferinadigitalcommunityofpracticeformanagingpneumoconiosismixedmethodsstudy AT xinshore interprofessionaldiscussionforknowledgetransferinadigitalcommunityofpracticeformanagingpneumoconiosismixedmethodsstudy AT akshaysood interprofessionaldiscussionforknowledgetransferinadigitalcommunityofpracticeformanagingpneumoconiosismixedmethodsstudy |