Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region

Ecological restoration has increasingly been employed to reverse land degradation and increase carbon (C) sink, especially in ecologically fragile karst areas. Microbial necromass carbon (MNC) constitutes a critical pool within soil organic carbon (SOC), contributing substantially to long-term C seq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuefeng Wu, Heng Liu, Xiaolong Bai, Dongpeng Lv, Mingzhi Lv, Yurong Yang, Wangjun Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/6/1436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849435299299459072
author Xuefeng Wu
Heng Liu
Xiaolong Bai
Dongpeng Lv
Mingzhi Lv
Yurong Yang
Wangjun Li
author_facet Xuefeng Wu
Heng Liu
Xiaolong Bai
Dongpeng Lv
Mingzhi Lv
Yurong Yang
Wangjun Li
author_sort Xuefeng Wu
collection DOAJ
description Ecological restoration has increasingly been employed to reverse land degradation and increase carbon (C) sink, especially in ecologically fragile karst areas. Microbial necromass carbon (MNC) constitutes a critical pool within soil organic carbon (SOC), contributing substantially to long-term C sequestration through mineral stabilization. However, its distribution patterns across soil profiles and grassland restoration stages in karst areas remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, the contents of bacterial necromass C (BNC), fungal necromass C (FNC), and their contributions to SOC were estimated based on glucosamine and muramic acid contents across the soil profile (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, 40–60 cm, 60–80 cm, and 80–100 cm) for four subalpine restoration stages (grazing enclosure for 5, 11, 17, and 25 years) in the karst region. Our findings demonstrated that both soil depth and grassland restoration stages effectively influenced the BNC and FNC contents. On average, the soil BNC, FNC, and total MNC at the depth of 80–100 cm reduced by 70.50%, 59.70%, and 62.18% compared with in topsoil (0–20 cm), respectively. However, the FNC/BNC ratio gradually increased with the increase in soil depth, which was 43.15% higher at 80–100 cm soil depth than in topsoil, suggesting that the accumulation efficiency of FNC was higher compared to BNC in the deep soil. The BNC, FNC, and MNC were positively correlated with the grassland restoration stage, while FNC/BNC ratio had a negative relationship with the restoration stage (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001). FNC contributed significantly more to SOC (28.6–36.4%) compared to BNC (7.7–9.9%) at all soil depths, indicating that soil fungal necromass has an essential effect on SOC sequestration. The results of the random forest model and distance-based redundancy analysis identified that pH, soil water content, and dissolved organic carbon were the three most essential predictors for the contribution of MNC to SOC. Our study highlights the importance of microbial necromass to SOC accumulation, providing significant scientific implications for the C pool management during the restoration of degraded grasslands in karst regions.
format Article
id doaj-art-697cbb83c8e9447e9b39ce909cdce09d
institution Kabale University
issn 2073-4395
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-697cbb83c8e9447e9b39ce909cdce09d2025-08-20T03:26:20ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952025-06-01156143610.3390/agronomy15061436Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst RegionXuefeng Wu0Heng Liu1Xiaolong Bai2Dongpeng Lv3Mingzhi Lv4Yurong Yang5Wangjun Li6Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College, Chongqing 401120, ChinaChongqing Industry Polytechnic College, Chongqing 401120, ChinaCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie 551700, ChinaKey Laboratory of Ecological Microbial Remediation Technology of Yunnan Higher Education Institutes, Dali University, Dali 671003, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, ChinaCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie 551700, ChinaEcological restoration has increasingly been employed to reverse land degradation and increase carbon (C) sink, especially in ecologically fragile karst areas. Microbial necromass carbon (MNC) constitutes a critical pool within soil organic carbon (SOC), contributing substantially to long-term C sequestration through mineral stabilization. However, its distribution patterns across soil profiles and grassland restoration stages in karst areas remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, the contents of bacterial necromass C (BNC), fungal necromass C (FNC), and their contributions to SOC were estimated based on glucosamine and muramic acid contents across the soil profile (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, 40–60 cm, 60–80 cm, and 80–100 cm) for four subalpine restoration stages (grazing enclosure for 5, 11, 17, and 25 years) in the karst region. Our findings demonstrated that both soil depth and grassland restoration stages effectively influenced the BNC and FNC contents. On average, the soil BNC, FNC, and total MNC at the depth of 80–100 cm reduced by 70.50%, 59.70%, and 62.18% compared with in topsoil (0–20 cm), respectively. However, the FNC/BNC ratio gradually increased with the increase in soil depth, which was 43.15% higher at 80–100 cm soil depth than in topsoil, suggesting that the accumulation efficiency of FNC was higher compared to BNC in the deep soil. The BNC, FNC, and MNC were positively correlated with the grassland restoration stage, while FNC/BNC ratio had a negative relationship with the restoration stage (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001). FNC contributed significantly more to SOC (28.6–36.4%) compared to BNC (7.7–9.9%) at all soil depths, indicating that soil fungal necromass has an essential effect on SOC sequestration. The results of the random forest model and distance-based redundancy analysis identified that pH, soil water content, and dissolved organic carbon were the three most essential predictors for the contribution of MNC to SOC. Our study highlights the importance of microbial necromass to SOC accumulation, providing significant scientific implications for the C pool management during the restoration of degraded grasslands in karst regions.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/6/1436microbial necromasssoil organic carbongrasslandsrestoration stagekarst area
spellingShingle Xuefeng Wu
Heng Liu
Xiaolong Bai
Dongpeng Lv
Mingzhi Lv
Yurong Yang
Wangjun Li
Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region
Agronomy
microbial necromass
soil organic carbon
grasslands
restoration stage
karst area
title Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region
title_full Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region
title_fullStr Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region
title_short Changes in Microbial Necromass Carbon in Soil Profiles of Grasslands with Different Stages of Restoration in a Karst Region
title_sort changes in microbial necromass carbon in soil profiles of grasslands with different stages of restoration in a karst region
topic microbial necromass
soil organic carbon
grasslands
restoration stage
karst area
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/6/1436
work_keys_str_mv AT xuefengwu changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion
AT hengliu changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion
AT xiaolongbai changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion
AT dongpenglv changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion
AT mingzhilv changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion
AT yurongyang changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion
AT wangjunli changesinmicrobialnecromasscarboninsoilprofilesofgrasslandswithdifferentstagesofrestorationinakarstregion