Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding anthrax among affected communities, Kazo district, South-Western uganda, May 2022

Abstract Background Anthrax is a priority zoonotic disease in Uganda. Despite health education about risks of eating meat from animals found dead, some areas including Kazo District, experience repeated anthrax outbreaks associated with this practice. We assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaban Senyange, Edirisa J. Nsubuga, Benon Kwesiga, Lilian Bulage, Alex R. Ario
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23436-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Anthrax is a priority zoonotic disease in Uganda. Despite health education about risks of eating meat from animals found dead, some areas including Kazo District, experience repeated anthrax outbreaks associated with this practice. We assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) around anthrax and consumption of meat of animals found dead in previously-affected communities in Kazo District. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted in six villages in Kazo District from May 23-June 4, 2022. Structured questionnaires were administered to 200 systematically-sampled community respondents aged ≥ 18 years about anthrax-related KAP and experiences with livestock loss. Focus group discussions were conducted with community members identified as anthrax case-patients in previous outbreaks and those whose animals died suddenly in the previous year. Overall knowledge was assessed through a set of eight questions on anthrax; species affected, signs and symptoms, transmission and prevention in humans and animals. Participants’ responses were scored to KAP questions as 1 = correct or 0 = incorrect; adequate knowledge score was ≥ 4. One sample binomial test was used to find the difference in proportions. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Among 200 survey respondents, 65% were female; mean age was 45 (SD ± 17.7) years. In total, 94% (p < 0.0001) had heard of anthrax, 65.5% (p < 0.0001) knew it was zoonotic; 74.5% (p < 0.0001) did not know any signs of anthrax in animals, though 78.5% (p < 0.0001) knew transmission could occur through eating animals found dead. Only 16% said they had lost their livestock suddenly in the last year; of these, 21% consumed the meat and 53% buried the carcasses. Overall, 77% (p < 0.0001) had adequate knowledge about anthrax. Qualitative data indicated that farmers did not vaccinate their animals against anthrax due to cost, and inadequate access to vaccine and veterinary services. Poverty, limited access to meat protein and economic challenges were cited as drivers for consuming meat from animals found dead despite the risk. Conclusion Good knowledge about anthrax among residents of a repeatedly-affected community may not have translated to safe practices. Compensating farmers for anthrax-positive carcasses in exchange for permitting safe animal disposal might reduce risk of transmission.
ISSN:1471-2458