Different honesty conceptions align across US politicians' tweets and public replies
Abstract Recent evidence shows that US politicians’ conception of honesty has undergone a bifurcation, with authentic but evidence-free “belief-speaking” becoming more prominent and differentiated from evidence-based “fact-speaking”. Here we examine the downstream consequences of those two ways of c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Fabio Carrella, Segun T. Aroyehun, Jana Lasser, Almog Simchon, David Garcia, Stephan Lewandowsky |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56753-6 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Warning people that they are being microtargeted fails to eliminate persuasive advantage
by: Fabio Carrella, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Inoculation reduces social media engagement with affectively polarized content in the UK and US
by: Fintan Smith, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The Case for Brutalist Honesty in Medical Education
by: Markle DT
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Tweets Classification and Sentiment Analysis for Personalized Tweets Recommendation
by: Asad Masood Khattak, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Behind Scientific Honesty Stands Scientific Bravery
by: E. V. Neverova
Published: (2015-06-01)