Different honesty conceptions align across US politicians' tweets and public replies
Abstract Recent evidence shows that US politicians’ conception of honesty has undergone a bifurcation, with authentic but evidence-free “belief-speaking” becoming more prominent and differentiated from evidence-based “fact-speaking”. Here we examine the downstream consequences of those two ways of c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Fabio Carrella, Segun T. Aroyehun, Jana Lasser, Almog Simchon, David Garcia, Stephan Lewandowsky |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56753-6 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Case for Brutalist Honesty in Medical Education
by: Markle DT
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Do Historians Upset Politicians? Once about Polish-Lithuanian Relations
by: Alfredas Bumblauskas
Published: (2006-12-01) -
Building coherence in the regulation of health research: A reply to Thaldar
by: V Bronstein, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
In reply to Promoting oral cancer awareness in LGBTQ+ communities – Diversity in oral health
by: John Lennon Silva Cunha, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Enhancing transparency and validity in psychosocial intervention research for migrant populations – authors' reply
by: Giulia Turrini, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01)