Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study

ABSTRACT Background Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of certain dermatophytoses. However, less is known about dermatophyte infections in pre‐diabetic patients, or how A1c impacts risk. Objectives Assess the relationship between recent (< 1 year) HgbA1c status and odds of cutaneous de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Ufkes, Zachary Hopkins, John Skylar Westerdahl, Scott R. Florell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:JEADV Clinical Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.610
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849410515060654080
author Nicole Ufkes
Zachary Hopkins
John Skylar Westerdahl
Scott R. Florell
author_facet Nicole Ufkes
Zachary Hopkins
John Skylar Westerdahl
Scott R. Florell
author_sort Nicole Ufkes
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of certain dermatophytoses. However, less is known about dermatophyte infections in pre‐diabetic patients, or how A1c impacts risk. Objectives Assess the relationship between recent (< 1 year) HgbA1c status and odds of cutaneous dermatophyte infection. Methods Case–control study of patients seen at the University of Utah Dermatology Department between January 1, 2015 and December 21, 2022. Tinea cases were identified by ICD‐10 codes and required the diagnosis be made by a dermatologist. Controls included patients seen in the dermatology department but who had no known diagnosis (past or current) of dermatophyte infection and were seen in a context where tinea could have been identified (i.e., no surgical visits, suture removals, spot checks, and cosmetic visits) and did not have a potentially confounding condition (inflammatory rashes). The primary exposure examined was averaged HgbA1c 1 year before index visit. Secondary exposures included HgbA1c 3 months, 3–6 months, and 6–12 months before visit as well as 3 months after the visit. Sensitivity analysis was performed using categorised Hgb A1c and historical diagnosis of diabetes. Results There was a 1.16‐fold increase in the odds of tinea per point increase in averaged pre‐visit A1c (odds ratio [OR] 1.16; confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.22). The odds of tinea for a given HgbA1c were higher for cutaneous tinea as compared to onychomycosis and tinea capitis. The odds of tinea were attenuated when adjusting for age and sex but remained significant (OR = 1.09; CI 1.03–1.15). Conclusions There was an association between averaged HgbA1c over the year before a visit and odds of tinea infection. This association was similar for individual A1c periods and was more pronounced for tinea infections outside of onychomycosis and tinea capitis. These data may support HgbA1c screening in patients with new dermatophytoses, or conversely may increase the suspicion of cutaneous dermatophytosis if HgbA1c is elevated.
format Article
id doaj-art-6936c32c4c8c4307bbd46d7ca4cf2eac
institution Kabale University
issn 2768-6566
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JEADV Clinical Practice
spelling doaj-art-6936c32c4c8c4307bbd46d7ca4cf2eac2025-08-20T03:35:06ZengWileyJEADV Clinical Practice2768-65662025-06-014246347010.1002/jvc2.610Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control StudyNicole Ufkes0Zachary Hopkins1John Skylar Westerdahl2Scott R. Florell3Department of Dermatology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADepartment of Dermatology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADepartment of Dermatology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADepartment of Dermatology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USAABSTRACT Background Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of certain dermatophytoses. However, less is known about dermatophyte infections in pre‐diabetic patients, or how A1c impacts risk. Objectives Assess the relationship between recent (< 1 year) HgbA1c status and odds of cutaneous dermatophyte infection. Methods Case–control study of patients seen at the University of Utah Dermatology Department between January 1, 2015 and December 21, 2022. Tinea cases were identified by ICD‐10 codes and required the diagnosis be made by a dermatologist. Controls included patients seen in the dermatology department but who had no known diagnosis (past or current) of dermatophyte infection and were seen in a context where tinea could have been identified (i.e., no surgical visits, suture removals, spot checks, and cosmetic visits) and did not have a potentially confounding condition (inflammatory rashes). The primary exposure examined was averaged HgbA1c 1 year before index visit. Secondary exposures included HgbA1c 3 months, 3–6 months, and 6–12 months before visit as well as 3 months after the visit. Sensitivity analysis was performed using categorised Hgb A1c and historical diagnosis of diabetes. Results There was a 1.16‐fold increase in the odds of tinea per point increase in averaged pre‐visit A1c (odds ratio [OR] 1.16; confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.22). The odds of tinea for a given HgbA1c were higher for cutaneous tinea as compared to onychomycosis and tinea capitis. The odds of tinea were attenuated when adjusting for age and sex but remained significant (OR = 1.09; CI 1.03–1.15). Conclusions There was an association between averaged HgbA1c over the year before a visit and odds of tinea infection. This association was similar for individual A1c periods and was more pronounced for tinea infections outside of onychomycosis and tinea capitis. These data may support HgbA1c screening in patients with new dermatophytoses, or conversely may increase the suspicion of cutaneous dermatophytosis if HgbA1c is elevated.https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.610dermatophytediabetes mellitushaemoglobin A1ctinea
spellingShingle Nicole Ufkes
Zachary Hopkins
John Skylar Westerdahl
Scott R. Florell
Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study
JEADV Clinical Practice
dermatophyte
diabetes mellitus
haemoglobin A1c
tinea
title Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study
title_full Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study
title_fullStr Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study
title_short Association Between A1c and Cutaneous Dermatophytosis: A Case–Control Study
title_sort association between a1c and cutaneous dermatophytosis a case control study
topic dermatophyte
diabetes mellitus
haemoglobin A1c
tinea
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.610
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoleufkes associationbetweena1candcutaneousdermatophytosisacasecontrolstudy
AT zacharyhopkins associationbetweena1candcutaneousdermatophytosisacasecontrolstudy
AT johnskylarwesterdahl associationbetweena1candcutaneousdermatophytosisacasecontrolstudy
AT scottrflorell associationbetweena1candcutaneousdermatophytosisacasecontrolstudy