Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases

Abstract Objectives To analyze the risk factors for developing dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) and investigate possible mechanisms and prognosis. Methods The case data of 43 patients who underwent OCF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (dysphagia group) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yufan Chen, Weihong Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05516-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585570146058240
author Yufan Chen
Weihong Xu
author_facet Yufan Chen
Weihong Xu
author_sort Yufan Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To analyze the risk factors for developing dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) and investigate possible mechanisms and prognosis. Methods The case data of 43 patients who underwent OCF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (dysphagia group) and group B (non-dysphagia group) based on Bazaz scoring criteria. Baseline data and imaging parameters were collected: O-C2 angle, C2-7 angle, pharyngeal inlet angle (PIA), posterior occipital cervical angle (POCA), O-EA angle, Oc-Ax angle, Atlas-dens interval, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS), and thickness of the prevertebral soft tissue. Potential risk factors were identified via one-way intergroup comparisons and included in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess associations between dnPAS% and each parameter and inter-parameter correlations. Predictors were selected to plot receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for diagnostic evaluation. Prognosis was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and curvilinear regression. Results Dysphagia occurred in 17 of 43 patients (39.53%). By the final follow-up (≥ 12 months), 11 patients (25.58%) had residual symptoms. Baseline factors, including dyspnea (P = 0.028), operative segment (P = 0.021), operative time (P = 0.006), anesthesia time (P = 0.025), solitude (P = 0.019), and satisfaction (P < 0.001), differed significantly between groups. Imaging parameters dO-C2a (P < 0.001), dPOCA (P < 0.001), PoPIA (P = 0.036), dPIA (P < 0.001), dOc-Axa (P = 0.001), dC2-7 SVA (P = 0.040), PonPAS (P = 0.004), dnPAS (P = 0.005), and dnPAS% (P < 0.001) were also significantly different. Multivariable regression analysis identified dPIA (OR = 0.870, P = 0.008) as an independent protective factor. ROC analysis showed dPIA had good diagnostic value (AUC = 0.855) with a cutoff of -8°. Prognostic analysis indicated rapid recovery was possible by 3 months postoperatively, with full recovery achieved in ~ 30% of patients by 1 year, after which recovery plateaued. Conclusion Postoperative dysphagia after OCF appears to result from multiple factors involving both “static + dynamic” elements. dPIA is a reliable predictor, with patients having a dPIA >-8° being less likely to develop dysphagia. However, only ~ 30% of patients achieve full recovery.
format Article
id doaj-art-6903d367765c4715815a1559c2b4f4e8
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-6903d367765c4715815a1559c2b4f4e82025-01-26T12:43:24ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-01-0120111210.1186/s13018-025-05516-6Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 casesYufan Chen0Weihong Xu1Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Trauma Orthopedics Emergency and Rehabilitation, Fuzhou Second General HospitalDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityAbstract Objectives To analyze the risk factors for developing dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) and investigate possible mechanisms and prognosis. Methods The case data of 43 patients who underwent OCF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (dysphagia group) and group B (non-dysphagia group) based on Bazaz scoring criteria. Baseline data and imaging parameters were collected: O-C2 angle, C2-7 angle, pharyngeal inlet angle (PIA), posterior occipital cervical angle (POCA), O-EA angle, Oc-Ax angle, Atlas-dens interval, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS), and thickness of the prevertebral soft tissue. Potential risk factors were identified via one-way intergroup comparisons and included in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess associations between dnPAS% and each parameter and inter-parameter correlations. Predictors were selected to plot receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for diagnostic evaluation. Prognosis was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and curvilinear regression. Results Dysphagia occurred in 17 of 43 patients (39.53%). By the final follow-up (≥ 12 months), 11 patients (25.58%) had residual symptoms. Baseline factors, including dyspnea (P = 0.028), operative segment (P = 0.021), operative time (P = 0.006), anesthesia time (P = 0.025), solitude (P = 0.019), and satisfaction (P < 0.001), differed significantly between groups. Imaging parameters dO-C2a (P < 0.001), dPOCA (P < 0.001), PoPIA (P = 0.036), dPIA (P < 0.001), dOc-Axa (P = 0.001), dC2-7 SVA (P = 0.040), PonPAS (P = 0.004), dnPAS (P = 0.005), and dnPAS% (P < 0.001) were also significantly different. Multivariable regression analysis identified dPIA (OR = 0.870, P = 0.008) as an independent protective factor. ROC analysis showed dPIA had good diagnostic value (AUC = 0.855) with a cutoff of -8°. Prognostic analysis indicated rapid recovery was possible by 3 months postoperatively, with full recovery achieved in ~ 30% of patients by 1 year, after which recovery plateaued. Conclusion Postoperative dysphagia after OCF appears to result from multiple factors involving both “static + dynamic” elements. dPIA is a reliable predictor, with patients having a dPIA >-8° being less likely to develop dysphagia. However, only ~ 30% of patients achieve full recovery.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05516-6Occipitocervical fusionDysphagiaCervical sagittal parametersPrognostic analysis
spellingShingle Yufan Chen
Weihong Xu
Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Occipitocervical fusion
Dysphagia
Cervical sagittal parameters
Prognostic analysis
title Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases
title_full Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases
title_fullStr Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases
title_short Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases
title_sort risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery a retrospective study of 43 cases
topic Occipitocervical fusion
Dysphagia
Cervical sagittal parameters
Prognostic analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05516-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yufanchen riskfactorsandprognosisanalysisofdysphagiaafteroccipitocervicalfusionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyof43cases
AT weihongxu riskfactorsandprognosisanalysisofdysphagiaafteroccipitocervicalfusionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyof43cases