Comparison of X-Ray Absorption in Mandibular Tissues and Tissue-Equivalent Polymeric Materials Using PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations

This study investigates the absorption of X-rays in mandibular tissues by comparing real tissues with tissue-equivalent materials using the PHITS Monte Carlo simulation program. The simulation was conducted over a range of X-ray photon energies from 50 to 100 keV, with increments of 5 keV, to evalua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasemin Gokcekuyu, Fatih Ekinci, Arda Buyuksungur, Mehmet Serdar Guzel, Koray Acici, Tunc Asuroglu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/23/10879
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the absorption of X-rays in mandibular tissues by comparing real tissues with tissue-equivalent materials using the PHITS Monte Carlo simulation program. The simulation was conducted over a range of X-ray photon energies from 50 to 100 keV, with increments of 5 keV, to evaluate the dose absorbed by different tissues. Real tissues, such as the skin, parotid gland, and masseter muscle, were compared with their tissue-equivalent polymeric materials, including PMMA, Parylene N, and Teflon. The results showed that the real tissues generally absorbed more X-rays than their corresponding equivalents, especially at lower energy levels. For instance, at 50 keV, differences in the absorbed doses reached up to 50% for the masseter muscle and its equivalent, while this gap narrowed at higher energies. The study highlights the limitations of current tissue-equivalent materials in accurately simulating real tissue behavior, particularly in low-energy X-ray applications. These discrepancies suggest that utilizing tissue-equivalent materials may lead to less accurate medical imaging and radiotherapy dose calculations. Future research should focus on improving tissue-equivalent materials and validating simulation results with experimental data to ensure more reliable dosimetric outcomes. This study provides a foundation for refining radiation dose calculations and improving patient safety in clinical applications involving X-rays.
ISSN:2076-3417