Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.

During sporogony, malaria-causing parasites infect a mosquito, reproduce and migrate to the mosquito salivary glands where they can be transmitted the next time blood feeding occurs. The time required for sporogony, known as the extrinsic incubation period (EIP), is an important determinant of malar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isaac J Stopard, Thomas S Churcher, Ben Lambert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-02-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008658&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850163023495299072
author Isaac J Stopard
Thomas S Churcher
Ben Lambert
author_facet Isaac J Stopard
Thomas S Churcher
Ben Lambert
author_sort Isaac J Stopard
collection DOAJ
description During sporogony, malaria-causing parasites infect a mosquito, reproduce and migrate to the mosquito salivary glands where they can be transmitted the next time blood feeding occurs. The time required for sporogony, known as the extrinsic incubation period (EIP), is an important determinant of malaria transmission intensity. The EIP is typically estimated as the time for a given percentile, x, of infected mosquitoes to develop salivary gland sporozoites (the infectious parasite life stage), which is denoted by EIPx. Many mechanisms, however, affect the observed sporozoite prevalence including the human-to-mosquito transmission probability and possibly differences in mosquito mortality according to infection status. To account for these various mechanisms, we present a mechanistic mathematical model, which explicitly models key processes at the parasite, mosquito and observational scales. Fitting this model to experimental data, we find greater variation in the EIP than previously thought: we estimated the range between EIP10 and EIP90 (at 27°C) as 4.5 days compared to 0.9 days using existing statistical methods. This pattern holds over the range of study temperatures included in the dataset. Increasing temperature from 21°C to 34°C decreased the EIP50 from 16.1 to 8.8 days. Our work highlights the importance of mechanistic modelling of sporogony to (1) improve estimates of malaria transmission under different environmental conditions or disease control programs and (2) evaluate novel interventions that target the mosquito life stages of the parasite.
format Article
id doaj-art-68bbe09354d54c3bb4174b91b5b3d115
institution OA Journals
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj-art-68bbe09354d54c3bb4174b91b5b3d1152025-08-20T02:22:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582021-02-01172e100865810.1371/journal.pcbi.1008658Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.Isaac J StopardThomas S ChurcherBen LambertDuring sporogony, malaria-causing parasites infect a mosquito, reproduce and migrate to the mosquito salivary glands where they can be transmitted the next time blood feeding occurs. The time required for sporogony, known as the extrinsic incubation period (EIP), is an important determinant of malaria transmission intensity. The EIP is typically estimated as the time for a given percentile, x, of infected mosquitoes to develop salivary gland sporozoites (the infectious parasite life stage), which is denoted by EIPx. Many mechanisms, however, affect the observed sporozoite prevalence including the human-to-mosquito transmission probability and possibly differences in mosquito mortality according to infection status. To account for these various mechanisms, we present a mechanistic mathematical model, which explicitly models key processes at the parasite, mosquito and observational scales. Fitting this model to experimental data, we find greater variation in the EIP than previously thought: we estimated the range between EIP10 and EIP90 (at 27°C) as 4.5 days compared to 0.9 days using existing statistical methods. This pattern holds over the range of study temperatures included in the dataset. Increasing temperature from 21°C to 34°C decreased the EIP50 from 16.1 to 8.8 days. Our work highlights the importance of mechanistic modelling of sporogony to (1) improve estimates of malaria transmission under different environmental conditions or disease control programs and (2) evaluate novel interventions that target the mosquito life stages of the parasite.https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008658&type=printable
spellingShingle Isaac J Stopard
Thomas S Churcher
Ben Lambert
Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.
title_full Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.
title_fullStr Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.
title_short Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony.
title_sort estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony
url https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008658&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacjstopard estimatingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariausingamechanisticmodelofsporogony
AT thomasschurcher estimatingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariausingamechanisticmodelofsporogony
AT benlambert estimatingtheextrinsicincubationperiodofmalariausingamechanisticmodelofsporogony