Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy

The value of combined L-( methyl -[ 11 C]) methionine positron-emitting tomography (MET-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with regard to tumor extent, entity prediction, and therapy effects in clinical routine in patients with suspicion of a brain tumor was investigated. In n = 65 patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kai R. Laukamp MD, Florian Lindemann PhD, Matthias Weckesser MD, Volker Hesselmann MD, Sandra Ligges PhD, Johannes Wölfer MD, Astrid Jeibmann MD, Bastian Zinnhardt PhD, Thomas Viel PhD, Michael Schäfers MD, Werner Paulus MD, Walter Stummer MD, Otmar Schober PhD, MD, Andreas H. Jacobs MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1536012116687651
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563146104340480
author Kai R. Laukamp MD
Florian Lindemann PhD
Matthias Weckesser MD
Volker Hesselmann MD
Sandra Ligges PhD
Johannes Wölfer MD
Astrid Jeibmann MD
Bastian Zinnhardt PhD
Thomas Viel PhD
Michael Schäfers MD
Werner Paulus MD
Walter Stummer MD
Otmar Schober PhD, MD
Andreas H. Jacobs MD
author_facet Kai R. Laukamp MD
Florian Lindemann PhD
Matthias Weckesser MD
Volker Hesselmann MD
Sandra Ligges PhD
Johannes Wölfer MD
Astrid Jeibmann MD
Bastian Zinnhardt PhD
Thomas Viel PhD
Michael Schäfers MD
Werner Paulus MD
Walter Stummer MD
Otmar Schober PhD, MD
Andreas H. Jacobs MD
author_sort Kai R. Laukamp MD
collection DOAJ
description The value of combined L-( methyl -[ 11 C]) methionine positron-emitting tomography (MET-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with regard to tumor extent, entity prediction, and therapy effects in clinical routine in patients with suspicion of a brain tumor was investigated. In n = 65 patients with histologically verified brain lesions n = 70 MET-PET and MRI (T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced [T1w-Gd] and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery or T2-weighted [FLAIR/T2w]) examinations were performed. The computer software “visualization and analysis framework volume rendering engine (Voreen)” was used for analysis of extent and intersection of tumor compartments. Binary logistic regression models were developed to differentiate between World Health Organization (WHO) tumor types/grades. Tumor sizes as defined by thresholding based on tumor-to-background ratios were significantly different as determined by MET-PET (21.6 ± 36.8 cm 3 ), T1w-Gd-MRI (3.9 ± 7.8 cm 3 ), and FLAIR/T2-MRI (64.8 ± 60.4 cm 3 ; P < .001). The MET-PET visualized tumor activity where MRI parameters were negative: PET positive tumor volume without Gd enhancement was 19.8 ± 35.0 cm 3 and without changes in FLAIR/T2 10.3 ± 25.7 cm 3 . FLAIR/T2-MRI visualized greatest tumor extent with differences to MET-PET being greater in posttherapy (64.6 ± 62.7 cm 3 ) than in newly diagnosed patients (20.5 ± 52.6 cm 3 ). The binary logistic regression model differentiated between WHO tumor types (fibrillary astrocytoma II n = 10 from other gliomas n = 16) with an accuracy of 80.8% in patients at primary diagnosis. Combined PET and MRI improve the evaluation of tumor activity, extent, type/grade prediction, and therapy-induced changes in patients with glioma and serve information highly relevant for diagnosis and management.
format Article
id doaj-art-68b31cee72ac4d75a2474bd3659e63f7
institution Kabale University
issn 1536-0121
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj-art-68b31cee72ac4d75a2474bd3659e63f72025-01-03T00:11:23ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212017-01-011610.1177/153601211668765110.1177_1536012116687651Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After TherapyKai R. Laukamp MD0Florian Lindemann PhD1Matthias Weckesser MD2Volker Hesselmann MD3Sandra Ligges PhD4Johannes Wölfer MD5Astrid Jeibmann MD6Bastian Zinnhardt PhD7Thomas Viel PhD8Michael Schäfers MD9Werner Paulus MD10Walter Stummer MD11Otmar Schober PhD, MD12Andreas H. Jacobs MD13 Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Department of Computer Science, Visualization and Computer Graphics Research Group, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Departments of Radiology, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Department of Neurosurgery, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Department of Neuropathology, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany European Institute for Molecular Imaging, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany European Institute for Molecular Imaging, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence (EXC 1003–CiM), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence (EXC 1003–CiM), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence (EXC 1003–CiM), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence (EXC 1003–CiM), Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany Department of Geriatric Medicine, Johanniter Hospital, Evangelische Kliniken, Bonn, GermanyThe value of combined L-( methyl -[ 11 C]) methionine positron-emitting tomography (MET-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with regard to tumor extent, entity prediction, and therapy effects in clinical routine in patients with suspicion of a brain tumor was investigated. In n = 65 patients with histologically verified brain lesions n = 70 MET-PET and MRI (T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced [T1w-Gd] and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery or T2-weighted [FLAIR/T2w]) examinations were performed. The computer software “visualization and analysis framework volume rendering engine (Voreen)” was used for analysis of extent and intersection of tumor compartments. Binary logistic regression models were developed to differentiate between World Health Organization (WHO) tumor types/grades. Tumor sizes as defined by thresholding based on tumor-to-background ratios were significantly different as determined by MET-PET (21.6 ± 36.8 cm 3 ), T1w-Gd-MRI (3.9 ± 7.8 cm 3 ), and FLAIR/T2-MRI (64.8 ± 60.4 cm 3 ; P < .001). The MET-PET visualized tumor activity where MRI parameters were negative: PET positive tumor volume without Gd enhancement was 19.8 ± 35.0 cm 3 and without changes in FLAIR/T2 10.3 ± 25.7 cm 3 . FLAIR/T2-MRI visualized greatest tumor extent with differences to MET-PET being greater in posttherapy (64.6 ± 62.7 cm 3 ) than in newly diagnosed patients (20.5 ± 52.6 cm 3 ). The binary logistic regression model differentiated between WHO tumor types (fibrillary astrocytoma II n = 10 from other gliomas n = 16) with an accuracy of 80.8% in patients at primary diagnosis. Combined PET and MRI improve the evaluation of tumor activity, extent, type/grade prediction, and therapy-induced changes in patients with glioma and serve information highly relevant for diagnosis and management.https://doi.org/10.1177/1536012116687651
spellingShingle Kai R. Laukamp MD
Florian Lindemann PhD
Matthias Weckesser MD
Volker Hesselmann MD
Sandra Ligges PhD
Johannes Wölfer MD
Astrid Jeibmann MD
Bastian Zinnhardt PhD
Thomas Viel PhD
Michael Schäfers MD
Werner Paulus MD
Walter Stummer MD
Otmar Schober PhD, MD
Andreas H. Jacobs MD
Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy
Molecular Imaging
title Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy
title_full Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy
title_fullStr Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy
title_short Multimodal Imaging of Patients With Gliomas Confirms C-MET PET as a Complementary Marker to MRI for Noninvasive Tumor Grading and Intraindividual Follow-Up After Therapy
title_sort multimodal imaging of patients with gliomas confirms c met pet as a complementary marker to mri for noninvasive tumor grading and intraindividual follow up after therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1536012116687651
work_keys_str_mv AT kairlaukampmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT florianlindemannphd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT matthiasweckessermd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT volkerhesselmannmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT sandraliggesphd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT johanneswolfermd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT astridjeibmannmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT bastianzinnhardtphd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT thomasvielphd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT michaelschafersmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT wernerpaulusmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT walterstummermd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT otmarschoberphdmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy
AT andreashjacobsmd multimodalimagingofpatientswithgliomasconfirmscmetpetasacomplementarymarkertomrifornoninvasivetumorgradingandintraindividualfollowupaftertherapy