Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial)
Objective: To evaluate the shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction of VITA ENAMIC multiColor anterior laminate veneers and compare it to that of IPS e.max CAD. Material and Methods: A total of twenty-two laminate veneers were fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and VITA ENAMIC multiColo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Brazilian Dental Science |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4391 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849229378443018240 |
|---|---|
| author | Nancy Sayed Abdel Aziz Abdel All Khalil Hesham Alansary Eman Ezzat Youssef |
| author_facet | Nancy Sayed Abdel Aziz Abdel All Khalil Hesham Alansary Eman Ezzat Youssef |
| author_sort | Nancy Sayed Abdel Aziz Abdel All Khalil |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Objective: To evaluate the shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction of VITA ENAMIC multiColor anterior laminate veneers and compare it to that of IPS e.max CAD. Material and Methods: A total of twenty-two laminate veneers were fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and VITA ENAMIC multiColor in the anterior zone, eleven veneers for each group. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups according to the restorative material. Group EX (control group) eleven IPS e.max CAD veneers and Group EMC (intervention group) eleven VITA ENAMIC multiColor veneers. Shade match and marginal adaptation was assessed using modified USPHS criteria and patient satisfaction was evaluated through visual analogue scale (VAS), immediately after cementation. Data were analyzed using CHI- square test. P 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of shade matching, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: IPS e.max CAD and VITA ENAMIC multiColor veneers provided a successful clinical performance in terms of shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction.
KEYWORDS
CAD-CAM; Ceramics; Color perception; Hybrid; Lithium disilicate.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-67de2dda5bcf425e8d32107b2bcd96c9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2178-6011 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual Paulista |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Brazilian Dental Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-67de2dda5bcf425e8d32107b2bcd96c92025-08-21T14:09:00ZengUniversidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilian Dental Science2178-60112024-12-0127410.4322/bds.2024.e4391Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial)Nancy Sayed Abdel Aziz Abdel All Khalil0https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7610-0407Hesham Alansary1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1873-1181Eman Ezzat Youssef2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-6478Cairo University, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics. Cairo, Egypt.Cairo University, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics. Cairo, Egypt.Cairo University, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics. Cairo, Egypt. Objective: To evaluate the shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction of VITA ENAMIC multiColor anterior laminate veneers and compare it to that of IPS e.max CAD. Material and Methods: A total of twenty-two laminate veneers were fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and VITA ENAMIC multiColor in the anterior zone, eleven veneers for each group. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups according to the restorative material. Group EX (control group) eleven IPS e.max CAD veneers and Group EMC (intervention group) eleven VITA ENAMIC multiColor veneers. Shade match and marginal adaptation was assessed using modified USPHS criteria and patient satisfaction was evaluated through visual analogue scale (VAS), immediately after cementation. Data were analyzed using CHI- square test. P 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of shade matching, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: IPS e.max CAD and VITA ENAMIC multiColor veneers provided a successful clinical performance in terms of shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction. KEYWORDS CAD-CAM; Ceramics; Color perception; Hybrid; Lithium disilicate. https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4391 |
| spellingShingle | Nancy Sayed Abdel Aziz Abdel All Khalil Hesham Alansary Eman Ezzat Youssef Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial) Brazilian Dental Science |
| title | Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial) |
| title_full | Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial) |
| title_fullStr | Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial) |
| title_short | Shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction: polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers (Randomized Clinical Trial) |
| title_sort | shade match marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction polymer infiltrated ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic anterior laminate veneers randomized clinical trial |
| url | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4391 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nancysayedabdelazizabdelallkhalil shadematchmarginaladaptationandpatientsatisfactionpolymerinfiltratedceramicversuslithiumdisilicateglassceramicanteriorlaminateveneersrandomizedclinicaltrial AT heshamalansary shadematchmarginaladaptationandpatientsatisfactionpolymerinfiltratedceramicversuslithiumdisilicateglassceramicanteriorlaminateveneersrandomizedclinicaltrial AT emanezzatyoussef shadematchmarginaladaptationandpatientsatisfactionpolymerinfiltratedceramicversuslithiumdisilicateglassceramicanteriorlaminateveneersrandomizedclinicaltrial |