Gas composition and pressure in the hypopharynx during high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula in healthy volunteers with different breathing patterns

Abstract Background High-flow nasal cannula is widespread in patients with hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure, but physiological data concerning influence of the combination of breathing pattern, preset flow rate (PFR), and inspiratory oxygen fraction (FDO2) on end-expiratory pressure (EE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrey I. Yaroshetskiy, Anna P. Krasnoshchekova, Fedor D. Tkachenko, Alina V. Rubashchenko, Daniil D. Zubarev, Vasiliy D. Konanykhin, Maxim I. Savelenok, Maxim M. Nosenko, Zamira M. Merzhoeva, Sergey N. Avdeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03267-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background High-flow nasal cannula is widespread in patients with hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure, but physiological data concerning influence of the combination of breathing pattern, preset flow rate (PFR), and inspiratory oxygen fraction (FDO2) on end-expiratory pressure (EEP), capnogram, oxygram, and exhaled tidal volume (VTe) remains insufficient. Methods The study included 20 healthy subjects with 12 combinations of PFR (30–60-80 L/min) and FDO2 (40–60-80–100%) multiplied by 4 breathing patterns: mouth closed (CM), mouth open (OM), and combination of the CM and OM with hyperpnea (HCM and HOM). Pressure, capnogram, oxygram were measured from hypopharyngeal catheter, VTe, and subject’s comfort were assessed. Results Inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) were close to FDO2 at the PFR of 30 L/min (CM), and 60 L/min (HCM). FiO2 during the OM and HOM were much less than FDO2, variable and unpredictable. PFR of 60 L/min was sufficient to keep FiO2 close to FDO2 during the CM and HCM. End-expiratory carbon dioxide (FECO2) decreased with an increase in the PFR and FDO2, reaching 1.4 (1.1–1.7)% at FDO2 100% and PFR of 80 L/min. EEP had grown a lot with the PFR increase and were highly variable reaching 11.1 (7.7–14.8) cmH2O at the PFR of 80 L/min. VTe at the PFR of 60 and 80 L/min were 948.0 (715.0–1204.8) and 948.0 (869.0–1422.0) ml, respectively. PFR of 60 L/min and 80 L/min were associated with discomfort. Conclusion HCM, OM, and HOM in healthy subjects decreased FiO2 and FECO2 (more pronounced during OM and HOM). HFNC within the CM and HCM provided flow-dependent CPAP-effects over a wide range and could be associated with lung hyperinflation. An excessive PFR led to discomfort. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06189716 , registered on 19/12/2023.
ISSN:1471-2253