Contrasting academic and lay press print coverage of the 2013-2016 Ebola Virus Disease outbreak.
Under a traditional paradigm, only those with the expected background knowledge consume academic literature. The lay press, as well as government and non-government agencies, play a complementary role of extracting findings of high interest or importance and translating them for general viewing. The...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Mark D Kieh, Elim M Cho, Ian A Myles |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179356&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Mental health risks and support for frontline workers during the 2013–2016 Ebola outbreak
by: Ira Chaturvedi, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Community engagement in outbreak response: lessons from the 2014–2016 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone
by: Katharine Owen, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
The Ebola Data Platform: A prospective, standardised, clinical dataset collected during the 2013-2016 West African Ebola outbreak [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Laura Merson, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
O ébola 2013/2016 e a multidimensionalidade espacial da inovação em medicamentos
by: Thiago Monteiro Mendes, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
The current Ebola outbreak: old and new contexts
by: Saverio Bellizzi
Published: (2014-11-01)