Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making

Abstract Background Family caregivers play an increasing role in cancer treatment decision‐making. We examined bias reported by family caregivers in the support they and their patient received from their healthcare team when making these decisions, including associations with distress. Methods Analy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom, Katherine A. Ornstein, Andres Azuero, Erin R. Harrell, Shena Gazaway, Kristen Allen Watts, Deborah Ejem, Avery C. Bechthold, Kyungmi Lee, Frank Puga, Ellen Miller‐Sonet, Grant R. Williams, Erin E. Kent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5182
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846157590869835776
author J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom
Katherine A. Ornstein
Andres Azuero
Erin R. Harrell
Shena Gazaway
Kristen Allen Watts
Deborah Ejem
Avery C. Bechthold
Kyungmi Lee
Frank Puga
Ellen Miller‐Sonet
Grant R. Williams
Erin E. Kent
author_facet J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom
Katherine A. Ornstein
Andres Azuero
Erin R. Harrell
Shena Gazaway
Kristen Allen Watts
Deborah Ejem
Avery C. Bechthold
Kyungmi Lee
Frank Puga
Ellen Miller‐Sonet
Grant R. Williams
Erin E. Kent
author_sort J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Family caregivers play an increasing role in cancer treatment decision‐making. We examined bias reported by family caregivers in the support they and their patient received from their healthcare team when making these decisions, including associations with distress. Methods Analysis of 2021 national survey data of family caregivers of patients with cancer (N = 2703). Bias experienced in decision support was assessed with the item: “Have you felt that the support you and the person with cancer have received for making cancer‐related decisions by your doctor or healthcare team has been negatively affected by any of the following?” Check‐all‐that‐apply response options included: age, race, language, education, political affiliation, body weight, insurance type or lack of insurance, income, religion, sexual orientation, and gender/sex. Chi‐square and regression analyses assessed associations between bias and caregiver distress (GAD‐2, PHQ‐2). Results Of 2703 caregiver respondents, 47.4% (n = 1281) reported experiencing ≥1 bias(es) when receiving decision support for making cancer‐related decisions. Bias was more prevalent among younger caregivers, males, transwomen/men or gender non‐conforming caregivers, racial/ethnic minorities, and those providing care over a longer time period. The odds of having high anxiety (GAD‐2 scores ≥ 3) were 2.1 times higher for caregivers experiencing one type of bias (adjusted OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6–2.8) and 4.2 times higher for caregivers experiencing ≥2 biases (adjusted OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.4–5.3) compared to none. Similar results were found for high depression scores (PHQ‐2 scores ≥ 3). Conclusions Nearly half of caregivers involved in their care recipients' cancer‐related decisions report bias in decision support received from the healthcare team. Experiencing bias was strongly associated with high psychological distress.
format Article
id doaj-art-67be81ed6b3c45ef859296c534a169e1
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-67be81ed6b3c45ef859296c534a169e12024-11-25T07:56:32ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-02-011233567357610.1002/cam4.5182Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐makingJ. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom0Katherine A. Ornstein1Andres Azuero2Erin R. Harrell3Shena Gazaway4Kristen Allen Watts5Deborah Ejem6Avery C. Bechthold7Kyungmi Lee8Frank Puga9Ellen Miller‐Sonet10Grant R. Williams11Erin E. Kent12School of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USADepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USASchool of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USADepartment of Psychology University of Alabama Tuscaloosa Alabama USASchool of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USADivision of Preventive Medicine School of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USASchool of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USASchool of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USASchool of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USASchool of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USACancerCare New York New York USADivision of Hematology‐Oncology School of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USAGillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USAAbstract Background Family caregivers play an increasing role in cancer treatment decision‐making. We examined bias reported by family caregivers in the support they and their patient received from their healthcare team when making these decisions, including associations with distress. Methods Analysis of 2021 national survey data of family caregivers of patients with cancer (N = 2703). Bias experienced in decision support was assessed with the item: “Have you felt that the support you and the person with cancer have received for making cancer‐related decisions by your doctor or healthcare team has been negatively affected by any of the following?” Check‐all‐that‐apply response options included: age, race, language, education, political affiliation, body weight, insurance type or lack of insurance, income, religion, sexual orientation, and gender/sex. Chi‐square and regression analyses assessed associations between bias and caregiver distress (GAD‐2, PHQ‐2). Results Of 2703 caregiver respondents, 47.4% (n = 1281) reported experiencing ≥1 bias(es) when receiving decision support for making cancer‐related decisions. Bias was more prevalent among younger caregivers, males, transwomen/men or gender non‐conforming caregivers, racial/ethnic minorities, and those providing care over a longer time period. The odds of having high anxiety (GAD‐2 scores ≥ 3) were 2.1 times higher for caregivers experiencing one type of bias (adjusted OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6–2.8) and 4.2 times higher for caregivers experiencing ≥2 biases (adjusted OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.4–5.3) compared to none. Similar results were found for high depression scores (PHQ‐2 scores ≥ 3). Conclusions Nearly half of caregivers involved in their care recipients' cancer‐related decisions report bias in decision support received from the healthcare team. Experiencing bias was strongly associated with high psychological distress.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5182biascancerdecision‐makingdiscriminationfamily caregiver
spellingShingle J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom
Katherine A. Ornstein
Andres Azuero
Erin R. Harrell
Shena Gazaway
Kristen Allen Watts
Deborah Ejem
Avery C. Bechthold
Kyungmi Lee
Frank Puga
Ellen Miller‐Sonet
Grant R. Williams
Erin E. Kent
Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making
Cancer Medicine
bias
cancer
decision‐making
discrimination
family caregiver
title Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making
title_full Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making
title_fullStr Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making
title_full_unstemmed Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making
title_short Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer‐related decision‐making
title_sort bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer related decision making
topic bias
cancer
decision‐making
discrimination
family caregiver
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5182
work_keys_str_mv AT jnicholasdionneodom biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT katherineaornstein biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT andresazuero biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT erinrharrell biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT shenagazaway biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT kristenallenwatts biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT deborahejem biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT averycbechthold biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT kyungmilee biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT frankpuga biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT ellenmillersonet biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT grantrwilliams biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking
AT erinekent biasreportedbyfamilycaregiversinsupportreceivedwhenassistingpatientswithcancerrelateddecisionmaking