Climate effects of a future net forestation scenario in CMIP6 models

Abstract Forestation may reduce temperatures by lowering atmospheric CO2. However, biogeophysical changes from forestation may weaken this cooling. We use twelve Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) models to quantify the biogeochemical (carbon cycle) and biogeophysical (non-carbon cycle) e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James L. Gomez, Robert J. Allen, Larry W. Horowitz, Steven T. Turnock, Rosie A. Fisher, Olivia E. Clifton, Bryan K. Mignone, Elena Shevliakova, Sergey Malyshev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01127-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Forestation may reduce temperatures by lowering atmospheric CO2. However, biogeophysical changes from forestation may weaken this cooling. We use twelve Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) models to quantify the biogeochemical (carbon cycle) and biogeophysical (non-carbon cycle) effects of net forestation, as quantified as the difference between the end of two future scenarios: ssp370-ssp126Lu and ssp370. Biogeochemical effects have an inferred global multi-model mean cooling (−0.08 ± 0.02 K). Changes in fires have no significant effect on land carbon storage globally. In contrast with studies indicating biogeophysical impacts counteract biogeochemical impacts by up to 50%, we find that biogeophysical effects lead to insignificant global mean cooling (−0.002 ± 0.041 K). Tropical land shows cooling (−0.058 ± 0.058 K) with eight of twelve models indicating cooling, consistent with prior studies. Using the Surface Energy Balance Decomposition, we find cooling is primarily from increased evapotranspiration and decreased downwelling solar radiation related to clouds and aerosols.
ISSN:2397-3722