Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression

The MDR1 gene is involved in drug resistance in many hematopoietic and solid tumors. The Quantitative PCR System 5000TM (QPCR-5000; Perkin-Elmer) is a new instrument system that uses electrochemiluminescence to automatically quantitate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. A comparative study be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Zhao, U. Consoli, R. Arceci, J. Pfeifer, W.S. Dalton, M. Andreeff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 1996-10-01
Series:BioTechniques
Online Access:https://www.future-science.com/doi/10.2144/96214pf01
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850152904761016320
author S. Zhao
U. Consoli
R. Arceci
J. Pfeifer
W.S. Dalton
M. Andreeff
author_facet S. Zhao
U. Consoli
R. Arceci
J. Pfeifer
W.S. Dalton
M. Andreeff
author_sort S. Zhao
collection DOAJ
description The MDR1 gene is involved in drug resistance in many hematopoietic and solid tumors. The Quantitative PCR System 5000TM (QPCR-5000; Perkin-Elmer) is a new instrument system that uses electrochemiluminescence to automatically quantitate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. A comparative study between radioactively labeled PCR (32P-PCR) and QPCR was performed to analyze the MDR1 gene expression in the drug-resistant (Doxorubicin) cell lines Dox40, Dox6, the parental cell line 8226/S, CEM Dox1 and three acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient samples. Using the Dox40 and Dox6 resistant cell lines, we compared the sensitivities of QPCR and 32P-PCR. A strong signal was obtained from QPCR at 20 to 25 cycles (which is in the linear range for quantitation), while a weak signal was obtained using 32P-PCR at the same cycle number. Dilution experiments gave better precision with the QPCR than with the radioactive method. AML samples were studied with the MDR1-specific MAbs MRK16 and 4E3, and the efflux function was analyzed using Rh-123 retention in the absence or presence of verapamil. The three samples showed high (D = 0.79), medium (D = 0.52) and negative (D = 0.08) p-glycoprotein (P-gp) levels and correlated with efflux function. The MDR1/β2-M mRNA ratios for 32P-PCR were 0.41, 0.40 and 0.12, respectively, and were 0.127, 0.097 and 0.028, respectively, for QPCR. There were significant differences between the samples with high and medium P-gp levels comparing the two methods. Very low levels of MDR1 in CEM Dox1 cells could be detected only by QPCR. In conclusion, QPCR was found to be more reproducible, accurate and sensitive than 32P-PCR.
format Article
id doaj-art-67440638b87444dc8d75ed28ee2ac8fd
institution OA Journals
issn 0736-6205
1940-9818
language English
publishDate 1996-10-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series BioTechniques
spelling doaj-art-67440638b87444dc8d75ed28ee2ac8fd2025-08-20T02:25:51ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBioTechniques0736-62051940-98181996-10-0121472673110.2144/96214pf01Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 ExpressionS. Zhao0U. Consoli1R. Arceci2J. Pfeifer3W.S. Dalton4M. Andreeff51The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX1The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX1The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX1The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX1The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX1The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TXThe MDR1 gene is involved in drug resistance in many hematopoietic and solid tumors. The Quantitative PCR System 5000TM (QPCR-5000; Perkin-Elmer) is a new instrument system that uses electrochemiluminescence to automatically quantitate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. A comparative study between radioactively labeled PCR (32P-PCR) and QPCR was performed to analyze the MDR1 gene expression in the drug-resistant (Doxorubicin) cell lines Dox40, Dox6, the parental cell line 8226/S, CEM Dox1 and three acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient samples. Using the Dox40 and Dox6 resistant cell lines, we compared the sensitivities of QPCR and 32P-PCR. A strong signal was obtained from QPCR at 20 to 25 cycles (which is in the linear range for quantitation), while a weak signal was obtained using 32P-PCR at the same cycle number. Dilution experiments gave better precision with the QPCR than with the radioactive method. AML samples were studied with the MDR1-specific MAbs MRK16 and 4E3, and the efflux function was analyzed using Rh-123 retention in the absence or presence of verapamil. The three samples showed high (D = 0.79), medium (D = 0.52) and negative (D = 0.08) p-glycoprotein (P-gp) levels and correlated with efflux function. The MDR1/β2-M mRNA ratios for 32P-PCR were 0.41, 0.40 and 0.12, respectively, and were 0.127, 0.097 and 0.028, respectively, for QPCR. There were significant differences between the samples with high and medium P-gp levels comparing the two methods. Very low levels of MDR1 in CEM Dox1 cells could be detected only by QPCR. In conclusion, QPCR was found to be more reproducible, accurate and sensitive than 32P-PCR.https://www.future-science.com/doi/10.2144/96214pf01
spellingShingle S. Zhao
U. Consoli
R. Arceci
J. Pfeifer
W.S. Dalton
M. Andreeff
Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression
BioTechniques
title Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression
title_full Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression
title_fullStr Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression
title_full_unstemmed Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression
title_short Semi-Automated PCR Method for Quantitating MDR1 Expression
title_sort semi automated pcr method for quantitating mdr1 expression
url https://www.future-science.com/doi/10.2144/96214pf01
work_keys_str_mv AT szhao semiautomatedpcrmethodforquantitatingmdr1expression
AT uconsoli semiautomatedpcrmethodforquantitatingmdr1expression
AT rarceci semiautomatedpcrmethodforquantitatingmdr1expression
AT jpfeifer semiautomatedpcrmethodforquantitatingmdr1expression
AT wsdalton semiautomatedpcrmethodforquantitatingmdr1expression
AT mandreeff semiautomatedpcrmethodforquantitatingmdr1expression