Patient Choice in Depression: Are We Failing to Implement NICE Guidelines?
In 2022, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) introduced “patient choice” as a major new principle in the guideline “Depression in adults: treatment and management.” In 2024, NICE launched a “patient decision aid” to provide practical support for this principle. We explore dat...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Patient Experience |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251325132 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In 2022, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) introduced “patient choice” as a major new principle in the guideline “Depression in adults: treatment and management.” In 2024, NICE launched a “patient decision aid” to provide practical support for this principle. We explore data on the treatment of depression from the United Kingdom's National Health Service before and after the guideline was published to consider whether patient choice has been enabled by these developments. The types of treatment most commonly delivered prior to the new guideline (Guided Self-Help books, Counseling for Depression, Cognitive Behavior Therapy, and antidepressant prescriptions) are now more common than before. This suggests that the inclusion of patient choice in the guidelines has not yet translated into patients making a wider range of choices. We consider how patient choice came to be prioritized over patient experience in the guideline development process; whether the patient decision aid is likely to support patient choice and shared decision making; and whether there may be underlying ideological barriers which mean a more straightforward emphasis on patient experience would be a more logical route to enhancing patient choice. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2374-3743 |