Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study

Aims: The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikhil Agarwal, Alasdair M. J. MacLullich, Nick D. Clement
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2025-01-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583785794764800
author Nikhil Agarwal
Alasdair M. J. MacLullich
Nick D. Clement
author_facet Nikhil Agarwal
Alasdair M. J. MacLullich
Nick D. Clement
author_sort Nikhil Agarwal
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates. Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance. Results: Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30). Conclusion: This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(1):53–61.
format Article
id doaj-art-673e3540bb184d77ba03ef566f3bcf24
institution Kabale University
issn 2633-1462
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj-art-673e3540bb184d77ba03ef566f3bcf242025-01-28T05:38:53ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622025-01-0161536110.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort studyNikhil Agarwal0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-6175Alasdair M. J. MacLullich1Nick D. Clement2Division of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKDivision of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKAims: The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates. Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance. Results: Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30). Conclusion: This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(1):53–61.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1hip fractureearly mobilizationoxycodonealfentanilprospective cohort studyprospective cohort studyhip fracturesalfentanilanalgesiaopioidphysiotherapyanalgesichip fracture surgerypostoperative pain
spellingShingle Nikhil Agarwal
Alasdair M. J. MacLullich
Nick D. Clement
Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study
Bone & Joint Open
hip fracture
early mobilization
oxycodone
alfentanil
prospective cohort study
prospective cohort study
hip fractures
alfentanil
analgesia
opioid
physiotherapy
analgesic
hip fracture surgery
postoperative pain
title Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study
title_full Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study
title_short Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study
title_sort is the rate of early mobilization in hip fracture patients using alfentanil better than standard opioid analgesia rehab a protocol for a prospective cohort study
topic hip fracture
early mobilization
oxycodone
alfentanil
prospective cohort study
prospective cohort study
hip fractures
alfentanil
analgesia
opioid
physiotherapy
analgesic
hip fracture surgery
postoperative pain
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT nikhilagarwal istherateofearlymobilizationinhipfracturepatientsusingalfentanilbetterthanstandardopioidanalgesiarehabaprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy
AT alasdairmjmaclullich istherateofearlymobilizationinhipfracturepatientsusingalfentanilbetterthanstandardopioidanalgesiarehabaprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy
AT nickdclement istherateofearlymobilizationinhipfracturepatientsusingalfentanilbetterthanstandardopioidanalgesiarehabaprotocolforaprospectivecohortstudy