A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India
Abstract Mapping landslide susceptibility is crucial for defining high-risk zones and preventing property and human casualties. The Uttarakhand provision, which comes under the Himalayan region, has a high potential for landslide occurrence. A landslide susceptibility map was created using satellite...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Discover Geoscience |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00138-1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850207837011050496 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohd. Alam Afzal Nadeem Siddiqui Syed Kausar Shamim Ateeque Ahmad Mohammed Faiz |
| author_facet | Mohd. Alam Afzal Nadeem Siddiqui Syed Kausar Shamim Ateeque Ahmad Mohammed Faiz |
| author_sort | Mohd. Alam |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Mapping landslide susceptibility is crucial for defining high-risk zones and preventing property and human casualties. The Uttarakhand provision, which comes under the Himalayan region, has a high potential for landslide occurrence. A landslide susceptibility map was created using satellite imagery, in-depth field research, and aerial photos. The historical landslide inventory of the state's 14698 total landslides was randomly bifurcated into 70% (10289) for training purposes and 30% (4409) for data validation. Eleven landslide-causative factors (Slope, Aspect, Curvature, Topographic Position Index (TPI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Geology, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Distance to Road, Distance to Stream, Distance to Fault, and Rainfall) were selected for susceptibility assessment. The landslide susceptibility zonation was created using the Shannon Entropy (SE), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) techniques, along with the causative factors. The AHP method is effectively utilized in LSM to prioritize and weigh the importance of different causative factors contributing to landslide occurrence, while Shannon Entropy uses the method of discrete probability distribution to quantify the uncertainty or variability associated with different causative factors. The FR, AHP, and SE models were validated using the AUC curve, yielding 92%, 89%, and 81% success rates and predictive rates of 90%, 87%, and 77%, respectively. The FR model is most suitable, more efficient, and valuable for future planning in the study area. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-67071997dc7645f1bb1d85c19a4bef97 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2948-1589 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discover Geoscience |
| spelling | doaj-art-67071997dc7645f1bb1d85c19a4bef972025-08-20T02:10:23ZengSpringerDiscover Geoscience2948-15892025-03-013112410.1007/s44288-025-00138-1A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, IndiaMohd. Alam0Afzal Nadeem Siddiqui1Syed Kausar Shamim2Ateeque Ahmad3Mohammed Faiz4Interdisciplinary Department of Remote Sensing and GIS Applications, Faculty of Science, Aligarh Muslim UniversityDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Aligarh Muslim UniversityDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Aligarh Muslim UniversityDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Aligarh Muslim UniversityInterdisciplinary Department of Remote Sensing and GIS Applications, Aligarh Muslim UniversityAbstract Mapping landslide susceptibility is crucial for defining high-risk zones and preventing property and human casualties. The Uttarakhand provision, which comes under the Himalayan region, has a high potential for landslide occurrence. A landslide susceptibility map was created using satellite imagery, in-depth field research, and aerial photos. The historical landslide inventory of the state's 14698 total landslides was randomly bifurcated into 70% (10289) for training purposes and 30% (4409) for data validation. Eleven landslide-causative factors (Slope, Aspect, Curvature, Topographic Position Index (TPI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Geology, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Distance to Road, Distance to Stream, Distance to Fault, and Rainfall) were selected for susceptibility assessment. The landslide susceptibility zonation was created using the Shannon Entropy (SE), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) techniques, along with the causative factors. The AHP method is effectively utilized in LSM to prioritize and weigh the importance of different causative factors contributing to landslide occurrence, while Shannon Entropy uses the method of discrete probability distribution to quantify the uncertainty or variability associated with different causative factors. The FR, AHP, and SE models were validated using the AUC curve, yielding 92%, 89%, and 81% success rates and predictive rates of 90%, 87%, and 77%, respectively. The FR model is most suitable, more efficient, and valuable for future planning in the study area.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00138-1Landslides susceptibility mapGeospatial techniquesAnalytical hierarchy processFrequency ratioShannon entropyUttarakhand |
| spellingShingle | Mohd. Alam Afzal Nadeem Siddiqui Syed Kausar Shamim Ateeque Ahmad Mohammed Faiz A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India Discover Geoscience Landslides susceptibility map Geospatial techniques Analytical hierarchy process Frequency ratio Shannon entropy Uttarakhand |
| title | A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India |
| title_full | A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India |
| title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India |
| title_short | A comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio (FR), Shannon Entropy (SE), and analytical hierarchy (AHP) in landslide prediction: a case study of Uttarakhand, India |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of geostatistical techniques of frequency ratio fr shannon entropy se and analytical hierarchy ahp in landslide prediction a case study of uttarakhand india |
| topic | Landslides susceptibility map Geospatial techniques Analytical hierarchy process Frequency ratio Shannon entropy Uttarakhand |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00138-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohdalam acomparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT afzalnadeemsiddiqui acomparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT syedkausarshamim acomparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT ateequeahmad acomparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT mohammedfaiz acomparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT mohdalam comparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT afzalnadeemsiddiqui comparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT syedkausarshamim comparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT ateequeahmad comparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia AT mohammedfaiz comparativeevaluationofgeostatisticaltechniquesoffrequencyratiofrshannonentropyseandanalyticalhierarchyahpinlandslidepredictionacasestudyofuttarakhandindia |