A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions

Abstract To date, no prospective study has been conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) and endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) for treating gastric muscularis propria lesions. We aimed to compare the safety...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhaohui Liu, Xiangyu Wang, Genhua Yang, Jiefeng Li, Yongsheng Lu, Dayong Sun, Ruinuan Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-12-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83203-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850102832186785792
author Zhaohui Liu
Xiangyu Wang
Genhua Yang
Jiefeng Li
Yongsheng Lu
Dayong Sun
Ruinuan Wu
author_facet Zhaohui Liu
Xiangyu Wang
Genhua Yang
Jiefeng Li
Yongsheng Lu
Dayong Sun
Ruinuan Wu
author_sort Zhaohui Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To date, no prospective study has been conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) and endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) for treating gastric muscularis propria lesions. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of ESR-EB with those of ESR-C for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter. A total of 64 patients were enrolled prospectively from May 2023 to November 2023 at Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University, and the People’s Hospital of Zhongshan City. The study compared clinical characteristics, tumour features, and surgical outcomes between the two groups. Of 64 patients, 29 underwent ESR-C, and 35 underwent ESR-EB. There were no differences in age, gender, location, tumour size, growth pattern, resection time, histology diagnosis, or follow-up time (P > 0.05). Complete resection was achieved in all the patients. The operation time was significantly greater in the ESR-C group than in the ESR-EB group (41.31 ± 9.87 min vs. 26.26 ± 10.32 min, P = 0.000). In the ESR-C cohort, 21 patients (72.41%) had perforation, and 1 patient (3.45%) had bleeding. In the ESR-EB group, 7 patients (20.00%) had perforation. The complication rate varied significantly between the two groups (P = 0.000). No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during the follow-up period. Both ESR-C and ESR-EB achieved a 100% complete resection rate for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter.ESR-EB had the potential to reduce the operation time and lower the occurrence of complications. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier ChiCTR2300072856.
format Article
id doaj-art-66fb24cb00124e47aa6b3f4ba81e22db
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-66fb24cb00124e47aa6b3f4ba81e22db2025-08-20T02:39:40ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-12-011411810.1038/s41598-024-83203-yA multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesionsZhaohui Liu0Xiangyu Wang1Genhua Yang2Jiefeng Li3Yongsheng Lu4Dayong Sun5Ruinuan Wu6Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan City People’s HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityDepartment of Pathology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen UniversityAbstract To date, no prospective study has been conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) and endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) for treating gastric muscularis propria lesions. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of ESR-EB with those of ESR-C for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter. A total of 64 patients were enrolled prospectively from May 2023 to November 2023 at Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University, and the People’s Hospital of Zhongshan City. The study compared clinical characteristics, tumour features, and surgical outcomes between the two groups. Of 64 patients, 29 underwent ESR-C, and 35 underwent ESR-EB. There were no differences in age, gender, location, tumour size, growth pattern, resection time, histology diagnosis, or follow-up time (P > 0.05). Complete resection was achieved in all the patients. The operation time was significantly greater in the ESR-C group than in the ESR-EB group (41.31 ± 9.87 min vs. 26.26 ± 10.32 min, P = 0.000). In the ESR-C cohort, 21 patients (72.41%) had perforation, and 1 patient (3.45%) had bleeding. In the ESR-EB group, 7 patients (20.00%) had perforation. The complication rate varied significantly between the two groups (P = 0.000). No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during the follow-up period. Both ESR-C and ESR-EB achieved a 100% complete resection rate for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter.ESR-EB had the potential to reduce the operation time and lower the occurrence of complications. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier ChiCTR2300072856.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83203-yEndoscopic Snare ResectionGastric muscularis propria lesionsMulticentreProspective
spellingShingle Zhaohui Liu
Xiangyu Wang
Genhua Yang
Jiefeng Li
Yongsheng Lu
Dayong Sun
Ruinuan Wu
A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
Scientific Reports
Endoscopic Snare Resection
Gastric muscularis propria lesions
Multicentre
Prospective
title A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
title_full A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
title_fullStr A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
title_full_unstemmed A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
title_short A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
title_sort multicentre prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions
topic Endoscopic Snare Resection
Gastric muscularis propria lesions
Multicentre
Prospective
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83203-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaohuiliu amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT xiangyuwang amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT genhuayang amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT jiefengli amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT yongshenglu amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT dayongsun amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT ruinuanwu amulticentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT zhaohuiliu multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT xiangyuwang multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT genhuayang multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT jiefengli multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT yongshenglu multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT dayongsun multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions
AT ruinuanwu multicentreprospectivecohortstudycomparingtwoendoscopicproceduresforthetreatmentofgastricmuscularisproprialesions