Valuing community health workers (CHWs): Opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending among CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program

Introduction: In the Indonesian stunting prevention program, the often non-salaried community health workers (CHWs) are responsible for monthly monitoring, counseling, and home visits. Understanding the importance of their roles from an economic perspective may inform a more sustainable and improved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adriana Viola Miranda, Ryan Rachmad Nugraha, Trio Sirmareza, Maritta Rastuti, Rizky Deco Praha, Rindang Asmara, Zack Petersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-05-01
Series:Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425000715
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: In the Indonesian stunting prevention program, the often non-salaried community health workers (CHWs) are responsible for monthly monitoring, counseling, and home visits. Understanding the importance of their roles from an economic perspective may inform a more sustainable and improved program delivery. Aim: To estimate the opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending incurred by the CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in two rural villages in Lombok, Indonesia. We interviewed 130 CHWs with a pre-validated, structured questionnaire. Opportunity costs were assessed using two valuation models: calculating their working time valuation based on regional minimum wage and the CHWs’ self-reported earnings outside of their community health work. Results: We found that 52·31 % of the CHWs were not satisfied with the current incentivization scheme. Opportunity cost calculation shows that these CHWs were underpaid: reported monthly workload is valued at USD 46·54 according to the valuation model based on regional minimum wage and USD 13·81 based on CHWs self-reported income. Furthermore, out-of-pocket spending reached almost one-third of the received incentives (median USD 2.90 (IQR 0·87–4·95)). Conclusion: Appropriately incentivizing CHWs working on stunting prevention programs in Indonesia is one of the main priorities to ensure better program delivery.
ISSN:2213-3984