Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure

Using a 940nm diode laser or traditional methods, second-stage implant exposure involves removing soft tissue above the dental implant to expose the implant fixture and complete the implant procedure. This study included twenty-three patients (43.5% of whom were males, and the female percentage was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saad M. Jameel, Salah A. Alkurtas, Mohammed K. Dhahir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Baghdad 2024-09-01
Series:Iraqi Journal of Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijp.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/physics/article/view/1235
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850252402896142336
author Saad M. Jameel
Salah A. Alkurtas
Mohammed K. Dhahir
author_facet Saad M. Jameel
Salah A. Alkurtas
Mohammed K. Dhahir
author_sort Saad M. Jameel
collection DOAJ
description Using a 940nm diode laser or traditional methods, second-stage implant exposure involves removing soft tissue above the dental implant to expose the implant fixture and complete the implant procedure. This study included twenty-three patients (43.5% of whom were males, and the female percentage was 56.5%), aged between 18 and 70 years, who had at least two implants (3-6 months after implant insertion). Implant exposure was performed in case 1, using the traditional methods of puncture, flap, or incision, and in case 2, using a 940 nm diode laser. The study took place in Baghdad, Iraq. The results showed that the average pain in the laser group was 1.48, which was less than the average pain in the traditional group, which was 3.70. The pain scores that patients immediately reported for the laser cases were between 0 and 3, while the pain scores for the conventional cases were higher, ranging from 2 to 6. This was statistically significant in favour of the laser cases. All patients using the traditional method required infiltration anaesthesia, while 20 patients were satisfied with topical anaesthesia in the diode laser cases; this was statistically significant, favouring the laser method. This study revealed that the 940 nm diode laser is more efficient than the conventional method regarding the patient's perception of pain and the need for infiltration anaesthesia.
format Article
id doaj-art-66d720e23c9b453ebc3f6e3b37c9d5fd
institution OA Journals
issn 2070-4003
2664-5548
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher University of Baghdad
record_format Article
series Iraqi Journal of Physics
spelling doaj-art-66d720e23c9b453ebc3f6e3b37c9d5fd2025-08-20T01:57:40ZengUniversity of BaghdadIraqi Journal of Physics2070-40032664-55482024-09-0122310.30723/ijp.v22i3.1235Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant ExposureSaad M. Jameel0Salah A. Alkurtas1Mohammed K. Dhahir2Laser Institute for Postgraduate Studies, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, IraqConsultant maxillofacial surgeon, College of Dentistry, Al-Turath University, Baghdad, IraqLaser Institute for Postgraduate Studies, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq Using a 940nm diode laser or traditional methods, second-stage implant exposure involves removing soft tissue above the dental implant to expose the implant fixture and complete the implant procedure. This study included twenty-three patients (43.5% of whom were males, and the female percentage was 56.5%), aged between 18 and 70 years, who had at least two implants (3-6 months after implant insertion). Implant exposure was performed in case 1, using the traditional methods of puncture, flap, or incision, and in case 2, using a 940 nm diode laser. The study took place in Baghdad, Iraq. The results showed that the average pain in the laser group was 1.48, which was less than the average pain in the traditional group, which was 3.70. The pain scores that patients immediately reported for the laser cases were between 0 and 3, while the pain scores for the conventional cases were higher, ranging from 2 to 6. This was statistically significant in favour of the laser cases. All patients using the traditional method required infiltration anaesthesia, while 20 patients were satisfied with topical anaesthesia in the diode laser cases; this was statistically significant, favouring the laser method. This study revealed that the 940 nm diode laser is more efficient than the conventional method regarding the patient's perception of pain and the need for infiltration anaesthesia. https://ijp.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/physics/article/view/1235LaserImplantPain2nd StageAnesthesia
spellingShingle Saad M. Jameel
Salah A. Alkurtas
Mohammed K. Dhahir
Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure
Iraqi Journal of Physics
Laser
Implant
Pain
2nd Stage
Anesthesia
title Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure
title_full Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure
title_fullStr Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure
title_full_unstemmed Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure
title_short Pain Perception and Anesthesia Requirements in Diode Laser vs. Traditional Methods for Second Stage Implant Exposure
title_sort pain perception and anesthesia requirements in diode laser vs traditional methods for second stage implant exposure
topic Laser
Implant
Pain
2nd Stage
Anesthesia
url https://ijp.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/physics/article/view/1235
work_keys_str_mv AT saadmjameel painperceptionandanesthesiarequirementsindiodelaservstraditionalmethodsforsecondstageimplantexposure
AT salahaalkurtas painperceptionandanesthesiarequirementsindiodelaservstraditionalmethodsforsecondstageimplantexposure
AT mohammedkdhahir painperceptionandanesthesiarequirementsindiodelaservstraditionalmethodsforsecondstageimplantexposure