Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers

ApTOLL, a new modulator of Toll-like receptor 4, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in healthy subjects and in stroke patients; however, the route of administration used so far (30 min infusion) can potentially be an issue in the acute stroke units where “time is brain.” To safely reduce the time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Macarena Hernández-Jiménez, Samuel Martín-Vílchez, Gina Mejía-Abril, Manuel Roman, Sergio Luquero-Bueno, David Piñeiro, Marc Ribó, Francisco Abad-Santos, Dolores Ochoa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162253124003226
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526275746824192
author Macarena Hernández-Jiménez
Samuel Martín-Vílchez
Gina Mejía-Abril
Manuel Roman
Sergio Luquero-Bueno
David Piñeiro
Marc Ribó
Francisco Abad-Santos
Dolores Ochoa
author_facet Macarena Hernández-Jiménez
Samuel Martín-Vílchez
Gina Mejía-Abril
Manuel Roman
Sergio Luquero-Bueno
David Piñeiro
Marc Ribó
Francisco Abad-Santos
Dolores Ochoa
author_sort Macarena Hernández-Jiménez
collection DOAJ
description ApTOLL, a new modulator of Toll-like receptor 4, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in healthy subjects and in stroke patients; however, the route of administration used so far (30 min infusion) can potentially be an issue in the acute stroke units where “time is brain.” To safely reduce the time of administration in future clinical trials, a dose-ascending, open-label, phase I clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects. The objective was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of ApTOLL when comparing intravenous infusion (30 min) vs. bolus intravenous injection (1–3 min). The study was divided into three periods: (1) volunteers received 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL as a slow intravenous infusion, (2) 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL was administered as a single bolus, and (3) subjects received 0.2 mg/kg as a single bolus injection. No adverse events related to ApTOLL administration at any dosing pattern were reported. Maximum concentration was detected at the end of the infusion/injection, and mean half-life was 9.5 h for both routes of administration. These results show that safety and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between intravenous infusion and bolus injection of ApTOLL, supporting a change of the route of administration for future clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05569720).
format Article
id doaj-art-66bd50befa7042889a4a285efed458dd
institution Kabale University
issn 2162-2531
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
spelling doaj-art-66bd50befa7042889a4a285efed458dd2025-01-17T04:49:28ZengElsevierMolecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids2162-25312025-03-01361102435Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteersMacarena Hernández-Jiménez0Samuel Martín-Vílchez1Gina Mejía-Abril2Manuel Roman3Sergio Luquero-Bueno4David Piñeiro5Marc Ribó6Francisco Abad-Santos7Dolores Ochoa8AptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, Spain; Neurovascular Research Unit, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain; Corresponding author: Macarena Hernández-Jiménez, AptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, Spain.Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, SpainClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, SpainClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, SpainClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, SpainAptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, SpainAptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, SpainClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, SpainClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), 28006 Madrid, SpainApTOLL, a new modulator of Toll-like receptor 4, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in healthy subjects and in stroke patients; however, the route of administration used so far (30 min infusion) can potentially be an issue in the acute stroke units where “time is brain.” To safely reduce the time of administration in future clinical trials, a dose-ascending, open-label, phase I clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects. The objective was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of ApTOLL when comparing intravenous infusion (30 min) vs. bolus intravenous injection (1–3 min). The study was divided into three periods: (1) volunteers received 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL as a slow intravenous infusion, (2) 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL was administered as a single bolus, and (3) subjects received 0.2 mg/kg as a single bolus injection. No adverse events related to ApTOLL administration at any dosing pattern were reported. Maximum concentration was detected at the end of the infusion/injection, and mean half-life was 9.5 h for both routes of administration. These results show that safety and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between intravenous infusion and bolus injection of ApTOLL, supporting a change of the route of administration for future clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05569720).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162253124003226MT: Oligonucleotides: Therapies and ApplicationsaptamerTLR4inflammationclinical trialhealthy subjects
spellingShingle Macarena Hernández-Jiménez
Samuel Martín-Vílchez
Gina Mejía-Abril
Manuel Roman
Sergio Luquero-Bueno
David Piñeiro
Marc Ribó
Francisco Abad-Santos
Dolores Ochoa
Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
MT: Oligonucleotides: Therapies and Applications
aptamer
TLR4
inflammation
clinical trial
healthy subjects
title Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers
title_full Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers
title_short Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers
title_sort clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of aptoll in healthy volunteers
topic MT: Oligonucleotides: Therapies and Applications
aptamer
TLR4
inflammation
clinical trial
healthy subjects
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162253124003226
work_keys_str_mv AT macarenahernandezjimenez clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT samuelmartinvilchez clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT ginamejiaabril clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT manuelroman clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT sergioluquerobueno clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT davidpineiro clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT marcribo clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT franciscoabadsantos clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers
AT doloresochoa clinicaltrialtocomparesafetyandtolerabilitybetweenintravenousinfusionandbolusintravenousinjectionofaptollinhealthyvolunteers