Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer
Compared to natural intelligence, artificial intelligence produces a specific epistemology, ontology, and, most importantly, ethical framework. In this article, I will primarily address the necessity of this framework in two parts. The first chapter will explore the issue of recognition through the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Istanbul University Press
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Acta Infologica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/68D40DD7C2B640309DD41B414952297A |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850195027078152192 |
|---|---|
| author | Haktan Kalır |
| author_facet | Haktan Kalır |
| author_sort | Haktan Kalır |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Compared to natural intelligence, artificial intelligence produces a specific epistemology, ontology, and, most importantly, ethical framework. In this article, I will primarily address the necessity of this framework in two parts. The first chapter will explore the issue of recognition through the lens of the body, boundaries, and differences. Here, I will delve into the reasons why humanism privileges certain perspectives, critique humanism itself, and present arguments for why subalternity is a viable alternative for the existence of AI. In the second part, I will examine how the pursuit of subaltern rights and definitions in the face of exploitation involving artificial intelligence can lead to the liberation of AI, cyborgs, humans, and robots AI simultaneously. This chapter aims to move beyond regarding artificial intelligence merely as a tool for data processing and instead explores the potential for autonomous existence within it. Ultimately, it seeks to establish a connection between the death of the developer and the emergence of the AI as subaltern ontologies. The primary objective of this article is to challenge the notion of human absoluteness and uniqueness in its evolution, and to define "AI" as a subject that encompasses inter-human and post-human plural epistemological, ethical, and ontological possibilities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-669c3571d5d94546ae13bbe317275f17 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2602-3563 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | Istanbul University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Infologica |
| spelling | doaj-art-669c3571d5d94546ae13bbe317275f172025-08-20T02:13:52ZengIstanbul University PressActa Infologica2602-35632023-06-017117318510.26650/acin.1279545123456Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the ProgrammerHaktan Kalır0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-8000Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, TurkiyeCompared to natural intelligence, artificial intelligence produces a specific epistemology, ontology, and, most importantly, ethical framework. In this article, I will primarily address the necessity of this framework in two parts. The first chapter will explore the issue of recognition through the lens of the body, boundaries, and differences. Here, I will delve into the reasons why humanism privileges certain perspectives, critique humanism itself, and present arguments for why subalternity is a viable alternative for the existence of AI. In the second part, I will examine how the pursuit of subaltern rights and definitions in the face of exploitation involving artificial intelligence can lead to the liberation of AI, cyborgs, humans, and robots AI simultaneously. This chapter aims to move beyond regarding artificial intelligence merely as a tool for data processing and instead explores the potential for autonomous existence within it. Ultimately, it seeks to establish a connection between the death of the developer and the emergence of the AI as subaltern ontologies. The primary objective of this article is to challenge the notion of human absoluteness and uniqueness in its evolution, and to define "AI" as a subject that encompasses inter-human and post-human plural epistemological, ethical, and ontological possibilities.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/68D40DD7C2B640309DD41B414952297Aartificial intelligencesubalterntechniqueproductionrecognition |
| spellingShingle | Haktan Kalır Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer Acta Infologica artificial intelligence subaltern technique production recognition |
| title | Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer |
| title_full | Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer |
| title_fullStr | Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer |
| title_short | Can the Artificial Intelligence Speak? Subalternity of “Subontologies” and the Death of the Programmer |
| title_sort | can the artificial intelligence speak subalternity of subontologies and the death of the programmer |
| topic | artificial intelligence subaltern technique production recognition |
| url | https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/68D40DD7C2B640309DD41B414952297A |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haktankalır cantheartificialintelligencespeaksubalternityofsubontologiesandthedeathoftheprogrammer |