Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients
Background. Prognostication is an important component of medical decision-making. A patients’ general prognosis can be difficult to measure. The Simple Prognostic Score (SPS) was designed to include patients’ age, mobility, aggregated vital signs, and the treating physician’s decision to admit to ai...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Clinical Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7281693 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832563496289566720 |
---|---|
author | Jeannette-Marie Busch Isabelle Arnold John Kellett Mikkel Brabrand Roland Bingisser Christian H. Nickel |
author_facet | Jeannette-Marie Busch Isabelle Arnold John Kellett Mikkel Brabrand Roland Bingisser Christian H. Nickel |
author_sort | Jeannette-Marie Busch |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background. Prognostication is an important component of medical decision-making. A patients’ general prognosis can be difficult to measure. The Simple Prognostic Score (SPS) was designed to include patients’ age, mobility, aggregated vital signs, and the treating physician’s decision to admit to aid prognostication. Study Aim. Our study aim is to validate the SPS, compare it with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) regarding its prognostic performance, and test the interrater reliability of the subjective variable of the decision to admit. Methods. Over a period of 9 weeks all patients presenting to the ED were included, routinely interviewed, final disposition registered, and followed up for one year. The C-statistics of discrimination was used to compare SPS and ESI predictions of 7-day, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Youden J Statistics and Odds ratio, using logistical regression, were calculated for the Simple Prognostic Score. In a subset, a chart review was performed by senior physicians for a secondary assessment of the decision to admit. Interrater reliability was calculated using percentages and Cohens Kappa. Results. Out of 5648 patients, 3272 (57.9%) had a low SPS (i.e., ≤ 1); none of these patients died within 7 days, 2 (0.1%) died within 30 days after presentation and 19 (0.6%) died within a year. The area under the curve for 1-year mortality of the Simple Prognostic Score was 0.848. Secondary analysis of the interrater agreement for the decision to admit was 92%. Conclusion. In a prospective study of unselected ED patients, the Simple Prognostic Score was validated as a reliable predictor of short- and long-term mortality. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-663e134a24444bbfa9503a95dd3727d8 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1742-1241 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Clinical Practice |
spelling | doaj-art-663e134a24444bbfa9503a95dd3727d82025-02-03T01:20:00ZengWileyInternational Journal of Clinical Practice1742-12412022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7281693Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency PatientsJeannette-Marie Busch0Isabelle Arnold1John Kellett2Mikkel Brabrand3Roland Bingisser4Christian H. Nickel5Emergency DepartmentEmergency DepartmentDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineEmergency DepartmentEmergency DepartmentBackground. Prognostication is an important component of medical decision-making. A patients’ general prognosis can be difficult to measure. The Simple Prognostic Score (SPS) was designed to include patients’ age, mobility, aggregated vital signs, and the treating physician’s decision to admit to aid prognostication. Study Aim. Our study aim is to validate the SPS, compare it with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) regarding its prognostic performance, and test the interrater reliability of the subjective variable of the decision to admit. Methods. Over a period of 9 weeks all patients presenting to the ED were included, routinely interviewed, final disposition registered, and followed up for one year. The C-statistics of discrimination was used to compare SPS and ESI predictions of 7-day, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Youden J Statistics and Odds ratio, using logistical regression, were calculated for the Simple Prognostic Score. In a subset, a chart review was performed by senior physicians for a secondary assessment of the decision to admit. Interrater reliability was calculated using percentages and Cohens Kappa. Results. Out of 5648 patients, 3272 (57.9%) had a low SPS (i.e., ≤ 1); none of these patients died within 7 days, 2 (0.1%) died within 30 days after presentation and 19 (0.6%) died within a year. The area under the curve for 1-year mortality of the Simple Prognostic Score was 0.848. Secondary analysis of the interrater agreement for the decision to admit was 92%. Conclusion. In a prospective study of unselected ED patients, the Simple Prognostic Score was validated as a reliable predictor of short- and long-term mortality.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7281693 |
spellingShingle | Jeannette-Marie Busch Isabelle Arnold John Kellett Mikkel Brabrand Roland Bingisser Christian H. Nickel Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients International Journal of Clinical Practice |
title | Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients |
title_full | Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients |
title_short | Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients |
title_sort | validation of a simple score for mortality prediction in a cohort of unselected emergency patients |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7281693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeannettemariebusch validationofasimplescoreformortalitypredictioninacohortofunselectedemergencypatients AT isabellearnold validationofasimplescoreformortalitypredictioninacohortofunselectedemergencypatients AT johnkellett validationofasimplescoreformortalitypredictioninacohortofunselectedemergencypatients AT mikkelbrabrand validationofasimplescoreformortalitypredictioninacohortofunselectedemergencypatients AT rolandbingisser validationofasimplescoreformortalitypredictioninacohortofunselectedemergencypatients AT christianhnickel validationofasimplescoreformortalitypredictioninacohortofunselectedemergencypatients |