The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique

At COP21 in Paris parties to the UNFCCC reiterated the goal of USD 100 billion annually in climate finance by 2020 and agreed to set a more ambitious target by 2025. A significant portion of these funds is intended to flow through the newly operational Green Climate Fund and will be dedicated to cli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morgan Scoville-Simonds
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut de Hautes Études Internationales et du Développement 2019-10-01
Series:Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/2243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850125831078150144
author Morgan Scoville-Simonds
author_facet Morgan Scoville-Simonds
author_sort Morgan Scoville-Simonds
collection DOAJ
description At COP21 in Paris parties to the UNFCCC reiterated the goal of USD 100 billion annually in climate finance by 2020 and agreed to set a more ambitious target by 2025. A significant portion of these funds is intended to flow through the newly operational Green Climate Fund and will be dedicated to climate change adaptation in developing countries. Meanwhile, growing support for adaptation is already flowing through diverse channels. International debates continue, not only over the amount of adaptation finance, but also with regard to fund governance. In particular, developing countries are seeking greater country control through increased participation in high-level decision-making and ‘direct access’ to adaptation funds. This paper proposes an overview of the primary channels currently employed in the emerging adaptation finance field, with particular attention to governance characteristics relevant to international debates. This analysis suggests that while both developing-country participation in decision-making and ‘direct access’ to funds have increased in some cases, the vast majority of adaptation finance continues to flow through traditional development aid channels and does not respond to developing countries’ concerns regarding fund governance. If adaptation finance structures are not perceived as legitimate by developing countries, a global, coordinated response to climate change may be put at risk. Further, the implications, in terms of social justice and the effectiveness of adaptation, of conducting adaptation along the lines of development are currently under-represented in the literature. Given the goal of mobilising, for adaptation and mitigation in developing countries, USD 100 billion per year by 2020, there is an urgent need for empirical research in this domain.
format Article
id doaj-art-6632ff609122484d8e5c12fbb4a76ecc
institution OA Journals
issn 1663-9375
1663-9391
language English
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Institut de Hautes Études Internationales et du Développement
record_format Article
series Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement
spelling doaj-art-6632ff609122484d8e5c12fbb4a76ecc2025-08-20T02:34:03ZengInstitut de Hautes Études Internationales et du DéveloppementRevue Internationale de Politique de Développement1663-93751663-93912019-10-017110.4000/poldev.2243The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and CritiqueMorgan Scoville-SimondsAt COP21 in Paris parties to the UNFCCC reiterated the goal of USD 100 billion annually in climate finance by 2020 and agreed to set a more ambitious target by 2025. A significant portion of these funds is intended to flow through the newly operational Green Climate Fund and will be dedicated to climate change adaptation in developing countries. Meanwhile, growing support for adaptation is already flowing through diverse channels. International debates continue, not only over the amount of adaptation finance, but also with regard to fund governance. In particular, developing countries are seeking greater country control through increased participation in high-level decision-making and ‘direct access’ to adaptation funds. This paper proposes an overview of the primary channels currently employed in the emerging adaptation finance field, with particular attention to governance characteristics relevant to international debates. This analysis suggests that while both developing-country participation in decision-making and ‘direct access’ to funds have increased in some cases, the vast majority of adaptation finance continues to flow through traditional development aid channels and does not respond to developing countries’ concerns regarding fund governance. If adaptation finance structures are not perceived as legitimate by developing countries, a global, coordinated response to climate change may be put at risk. Further, the implications, in terms of social justice and the effectiveness of adaptation, of conducting adaptation along the lines of development are currently under-represented in the literature. Given the goal of mobilising, for adaptation and mitigation in developing countries, USD 100 billion per year by 2020, there is an urgent need for empirical research in this domain.https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/2243
spellingShingle Morgan Scoville-Simonds
The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique
Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement
title The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique
title_full The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique
title_fullStr The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique
title_full_unstemmed The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique
title_short The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Finance—An Overview and Critique
title_sort governance of climate change adaptation finance an overview and critique
url https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/2243
work_keys_str_mv AT morganscovillesimonds thegovernanceofclimatechangeadaptationfinanceanoverviewandcritique
AT morganscovillesimonds governanceofclimatechangeadaptationfinanceanoverviewandcritique