Back to Hart
The essay addresses two different senses of important "problems" for contemporary legal philosophy. In the first case, the "problem" is having forgotten things we learned from H.L.A. Hart, and, partly as a result, encouraging pointless metaphysical inquiries in other directions t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Leiter Brian |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2021/0003-25652104749L.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Can there be a plural acceptance of the rule of recognition? Notes on Kevin Toh’s expressivist analysis of Hart’s internal legal statements
by: Rodrigo Dornas de Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Commanding and Defining. On Eugenio Bulygin’s Theory of Legal Power-Conferring Rules
by: Gonzalo Villa Rosas
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Yükümlülük Kavramının Anavatanı: H.L.A. Hart’ın Hukuk Teorisinde Bir Cevap Arayışı
by: Fatih Güneş
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Libertarismo & error categorial
by: Carlos G. Patarroyo G.
Published: (2009-09-01) -
LIBERTARISMO & ERROR CATEGORIAL
by: Carlos G. Patarroyo G.
Published: (2009-01-01)