Back to Hart
The essay addresses two different senses of important "problems" for contemporary legal philosophy. In the first case, the "problem" is having forgotten things we learned from H.L.A. Hart, and, partly as a result, encouraging pointless metaphysical inquiries in other directions t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2021/0003-25652104749L.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850196819256016896 |
|---|---|
| author | Leiter Brian |
| author_facet | Leiter Brian |
| author_sort | Leiter Brian |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The essay addresses two different senses of important "problems" for contemporary legal philosophy. In the first case, the "problem" is having forgotten things we learned from H.L.A. Hart, and, partly as a result, encouraging pointless metaphysical inquiries in other directions that take us very far from questions about the nature of law and legal reasoning. In the second case, the "problem" is to attend more carefully to Hart's views and his philosophical context to think about the problem of theoretical disagreement, and to understand the way in which later commentators have misunderstood his behaviorist (Rylean) analysis of "accepting a rule from an internal point of view." |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-660d335a8cc741f3afe82858dfc099ec |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0003-2565 2406-2693 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
| spelling | doaj-art-660d335a8cc741f3afe82858dfc099ec2025-08-20T02:13:20ZengUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, SerbiaAnali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu0003-25652406-26932021-01-0169474976010.51204/Anali_PFBU_21401A0003-25652104749LBack to HartLeiter Brian0University of Chicago, Center for Law, Philosophy & Human Values, Chicago, United States of AmericaThe essay addresses two different senses of important "problems" for contemporary legal philosophy. In the first case, the "problem" is having forgotten things we learned from H.L.A. Hart, and, partly as a result, encouraging pointless metaphysical inquiries in other directions that take us very far from questions about the nature of law and legal reasoning. In the second case, the "problem" is to attend more carefully to Hart's views and his philosophical context to think about the problem of theoretical disagreement, and to understand the way in which later commentators have misunderstood his behaviorist (Rylean) analysis of "accepting a rule from an internal point of view."https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2021/0003-25652104749L.pdfh.l.a. hartgilbert ryleinternal point of viewtheoretical disagreementmetaphysical grounding |
| spellingShingle | Leiter Brian Back to Hart Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu h.l.a. hart gilbert ryle internal point of view theoretical disagreement metaphysical grounding |
| title | Back to Hart |
| title_full | Back to Hart |
| title_fullStr | Back to Hart |
| title_full_unstemmed | Back to Hart |
| title_short | Back to Hart |
| title_sort | back to hart |
| topic | h.l.a. hart gilbert ryle internal point of view theoretical disagreement metaphysical grounding |
| url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2021/0003-25652104749L.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leiterbrian backtohart |