Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP

Background. Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) can result in obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been an alternative for DMBO after failed ERCP. Aim. To compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade and transluminal approaches in pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yonghua Shen, Ying Lv, Xiaojiao Zheng, Wei Zhan, Senlin Hou, Lin Zhou, Jun Cao, Bin Zhang, Lei Wang, Hao Zhu, Lichao Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/1458297
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546267228536832
author Yonghua Shen
Ying Lv
Xiaojiao Zheng
Wei Zhan
Senlin Hou
Lin Zhou
Jun Cao
Bin Zhang
Lei Wang
Hao Zhu
Lichao Zhang
author_facet Yonghua Shen
Ying Lv
Xiaojiao Zheng
Wei Zhan
Senlin Hou
Lin Zhou
Jun Cao
Bin Zhang
Lei Wang
Hao Zhu
Lichao Zhang
author_sort Yonghua Shen
collection DOAJ
description Background. Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) can result in obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been an alternative for DMBO after failed ERCP. Aim. To compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade and transluminal approaches in patients with unresectable DMBO when ERCP failed. Methods. Patients with DMBO leading to obstructive jaundice after failed ERCP were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy between EUS-guided transluminal stenting (TLS group) and antegrade stenting (AGS group). Results. 82 patients were enrolled, of which 45 patients were in TLS group and 37 in AGS group. There were no statistical differences in the malignancy type, baseline common bile duct diameter, total bilirubin level, reason for EUS-BD, and history of biliary drainage between TLS and AGS groups. The technical success rate was statistically higher in TLS group than in AGS group (97.8 vs. 81.1%, P=0.031). There were no statistical differences in clinical success rate, procedure-related adverse events, stent migration rate, stent dysfunction rate, reintervention rate, and overall patient survival time between TLS and AGS groups. The median time to stent dysfunction or patient death in TLS and AGS groups was 53 and 81 days, respectively (P=0.017). Conclusions. Although AGS had a lower technical success rate than TLS, it was superior to TLS in stent patency in patients with DMBO.
format Article
id doaj-art-65ed25a1fe6d4299b33882fe4cf54309
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-65ed25a1fe6d4299b33882fe4cf543092025-02-03T07:23:23ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-630X2024-01-01202410.1155/2024/1458297Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCPYonghua Shen0Ying Lv1Xiaojiao Zheng2Wei Zhan3Senlin Hou4Lin Zhou5Jun Cao6Bin Zhang7Lei Wang8Hao Zhu9Lichao Zhang10Department of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyBiliopancreatic Endoscopic Surgery DepartmentDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyBiliopancreatic Endoscopic Surgery DepartmentBackground. Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) can result in obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been an alternative for DMBO after failed ERCP. Aim. To compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade and transluminal approaches in patients with unresectable DMBO when ERCP failed. Methods. Patients with DMBO leading to obstructive jaundice after failed ERCP were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy between EUS-guided transluminal stenting (TLS group) and antegrade stenting (AGS group). Results. 82 patients were enrolled, of which 45 patients were in TLS group and 37 in AGS group. There were no statistical differences in the malignancy type, baseline common bile duct diameter, total bilirubin level, reason for EUS-BD, and history of biliary drainage between TLS and AGS groups. The technical success rate was statistically higher in TLS group than in AGS group (97.8 vs. 81.1%, P=0.031). There were no statistical differences in clinical success rate, procedure-related adverse events, stent migration rate, stent dysfunction rate, reintervention rate, and overall patient survival time between TLS and AGS groups. The median time to stent dysfunction or patient death in TLS and AGS groups was 53 and 81 days, respectively (P=0.017). Conclusions. Although AGS had a lower technical success rate than TLS, it was superior to TLS in stent patency in patients with DMBO.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/1458297
spellingShingle Yonghua Shen
Ying Lv
Xiaojiao Zheng
Wei Zhan
Senlin Hou
Lin Zhou
Jun Cao
Bin Zhang
Lei Wang
Hao Zhu
Lichao Zhang
Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP
title_full Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP
title_fullStr Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP
title_short Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP
title_sort comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided antegrade and transluminal stent implantation in distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ercp
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/1458297
work_keys_str_mv AT yonghuashen comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT yinglv comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT xiaojiaozheng comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT weizhan comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT senlinhou comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT linzhou comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT juncao comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT binzhang comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT leiwang comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT haozhu comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp
AT lichaozhang comparisonbetweenendoscopicultrasoundguidedantegradeandtransluminalstentimplantationindistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionafterfailedercp