Type‐III Superconductivity

Abstract Superconductivity remains one of most fascinating quantum phenomena existing on a macroscopic scale. Its rich phenomenology is usually described by the Ginzburg–Landau (GL) theory in terms of the order parameter, representing the macroscopic wave function of the superconducting condensate....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Cristina Diamantini, Carlo A. Trugenberger, Sheng‐Zong Chen, Yu‐Jung Lu, Chi‐Te Liang, Valerii M. Vinokur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Series:Advanced Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206523
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849239375181774848
author M. Cristina Diamantini
Carlo A. Trugenberger
Sheng‐Zong Chen
Yu‐Jung Lu
Chi‐Te Liang
Valerii M. Vinokur
author_facet M. Cristina Diamantini
Carlo A. Trugenberger
Sheng‐Zong Chen
Yu‐Jung Lu
Chi‐Te Liang
Valerii M. Vinokur
author_sort M. Cristina Diamantini
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Superconductivity remains one of most fascinating quantum phenomena existing on a macroscopic scale. Its rich phenomenology is usually described by the Ginzburg–Landau (GL) theory in terms of the order parameter, representing the macroscopic wave function of the superconducting condensate. The GL theory addresses one of the prime superconducting properties, screening of the electromagnetic field because it becomes massive within a superconductor, the famous Anderson–Higgs mechanism. Here the authors describe another widely‐spread type of superconductivity where the Anderson–Higgs mechanism does not work and must be replaced by the Deser–Jackiw–Templeton topological mass generation and, correspondingly, the GL effective field theory must be replaced by an effective topological gauge theory. These superconductors are inherently inhomogeneous granular superconductors, where electronic granularity is either fundamental or emerging. It is shown that the corresponding superconducting transition is a 3D generalization of the 2D Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless vortex binding–unbinding transition. The binding–unbinding of the line‐like vortices in 3D results in the Vogel‐Fulcher‐Tamman scaling of the resistance near the superconducting transition. The authors report experimental data fully confirming the VFT behavior of the resistance.
format Article
id doaj-art-65df7971737f4470b5a6de3cb36f45b4
institution Kabale University
issn 2198-3844
language English
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advanced Science
spelling doaj-art-65df7971737f4470b5a6de3cb36f45b42025-08-20T04:01:01ZengWileyAdvanced Science2198-38442023-05-011014n/an/a10.1002/advs.202206523Type‐III SuperconductivityM. Cristina Diamantini0Carlo A. Trugenberger1Sheng‐Zong Chen2Yu‐Jung Lu3Chi‐Te Liang4Valerii M. Vinokur5NiPS Laboratory INFN and Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia University of Perugia via A. Pascoli Perugia I‐06100 ItalySwissScientific Technologies SA rue du Rhone 59 Geneva CH‐1204 SwitzerlandDepartment of Physics National Taiwan University Taipei 106 TaiwanDepartment of Physics National Taiwan University Taipei 106 TaiwanDepartment of Physics National Taiwan University Taipei 106 TaiwanTerra Quantum AG Kornhausstrasse 25 St. Gallen CH‐9000 SwitzerlandAbstract Superconductivity remains one of most fascinating quantum phenomena existing on a macroscopic scale. Its rich phenomenology is usually described by the Ginzburg–Landau (GL) theory in terms of the order parameter, representing the macroscopic wave function of the superconducting condensate. The GL theory addresses one of the prime superconducting properties, screening of the electromagnetic field because it becomes massive within a superconductor, the famous Anderson–Higgs mechanism. Here the authors describe another widely‐spread type of superconductivity where the Anderson–Higgs mechanism does not work and must be replaced by the Deser–Jackiw–Templeton topological mass generation and, correspondingly, the GL effective field theory must be replaced by an effective topological gauge theory. These superconductors are inherently inhomogeneous granular superconductors, where electronic granularity is either fundamental or emerging. It is shown that the corresponding superconducting transition is a 3D generalization of the 2D Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless vortex binding–unbinding transition. The binding–unbinding of the line‐like vortices in 3D results in the Vogel‐Fulcher‐Tamman scaling of the resistance near the superconducting transition. The authors report experimental data fully confirming the VFT behavior of the resistance.https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206523Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transitionsuperconductivityvortex deconfinement
spellingShingle M. Cristina Diamantini
Carlo A. Trugenberger
Sheng‐Zong Chen
Yu‐Jung Lu
Chi‐Te Liang
Valerii M. Vinokur
Type‐III Superconductivity
Advanced Science
Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition
superconductivity
vortex deconfinement
title Type‐III Superconductivity
title_full Type‐III Superconductivity
title_fullStr Type‐III Superconductivity
title_full_unstemmed Type‐III Superconductivity
title_short Type‐III Superconductivity
title_sort type iii superconductivity
topic Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition
superconductivity
vortex deconfinement
url https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206523
work_keys_str_mv AT mcristinadiamantini typeiiisuperconductivity
AT carloatrugenberger typeiiisuperconductivity
AT shengzongchen typeiiisuperconductivity
AT yujunglu typeiiisuperconductivity
AT chiteliang typeiiisuperconductivity
AT valeriimvinokur typeiiisuperconductivity