Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.

<h4>Introduction</h4>This cluster randomised trial evaluated an intervention to decrease x-ray referrals and increase giving advice to stay active for people with acute low back pain (LBP) in general practice.<h4>Methods</h4>General practices were randomised to either access...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon D French, Joanne E McKenzie, Denise A O'Connor, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Duncan Mortimer, Jill J Francis, Susan Michie, Neil Spike, Peter Schattner, Peter Kent, Rachelle Buchbinder, Matthew J Page, Sally E Green
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065471&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850171774311858176
author Simon D French
Joanne E McKenzie
Denise A O'Connor
Jeremy M Grimshaw
Duncan Mortimer
Jill J Francis
Susan Michie
Neil Spike
Peter Schattner
Peter Kent
Rachelle Buchbinder
Matthew J Page
Sally E Green
author_facet Simon D French
Joanne E McKenzie
Denise A O'Connor
Jeremy M Grimshaw
Duncan Mortimer
Jill J Francis
Susan Michie
Neil Spike
Peter Schattner
Peter Kent
Rachelle Buchbinder
Matthew J Page
Sally E Green
author_sort Simon D French
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>This cluster randomised trial evaluated an intervention to decrease x-ray referrals and increase giving advice to stay active for people with acute low back pain (LBP) in general practice.<h4>Methods</h4>General practices were randomised to either access to a guideline for acute LBP (control) or facilitated interactive workshops (intervention). We measured behavioural predictors (e.g. knowledge, attitudes and intentions) and fear avoidance beliefs. We were unable to recruit sufficient patients to measure our original primary outcomes so we introduced other outcomes measured at the general practitioner (GP) level: behavioural simulation (clinical decision about vignettes) and rates of x-ray and CT-scan (medical administrative data). All those not involved in the delivery of the intervention were blinded to allocation.<h4>Results</h4>47 practices (53 GPs) were randomised to the control and 45 practices (59 GPs) to the intervention. The number of GPs available for analysis at 12 months varied by outcome due to missing confounder information; a minimum of 38 GPs were available from the intervention group, and a minimum of 40 GPs from the control group. For the behavioural constructs, although effect estimates were small, the intervention group GPs had greater intention of practising consistent with the guideline for the clinical behaviour of x-ray referral. For behavioural simulation, intervention group GPs were more likely to adhere to guideline recommendations about x-ray (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.01, 3.05) and more likely to give advice to stay active (OR 4.49, 95%CI 1.90 to 10.60). Imaging referral was not statistically significantly different between groups and the potential importance of effects was unclear; rate ratio 0.87 (95%CI 0.68, 1.10) for x-ray or CT-scan.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The intervention led to small changes in GP intention to practice in a manner that is consistent with an evidence-based guideline, but it did not result in statistically significant changes in actual behaviour.<h4>Trial registration</h4>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012606000098538.
format Article
id doaj-art-65bdbaf4d2ef43d6894b3a3b859e366c
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-65bdbaf4d2ef43d6894b3a3b859e366c2025-08-20T02:20:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6547110.1371/journal.pone.0065471Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.Simon D FrenchJoanne E McKenzieDenise A O'ConnorJeremy M GrimshawDuncan MortimerJill J FrancisSusan MichieNeil SpikePeter SchattnerPeter KentRachelle BuchbinderMatthew J PageSally E Green<h4>Introduction</h4>This cluster randomised trial evaluated an intervention to decrease x-ray referrals and increase giving advice to stay active for people with acute low back pain (LBP) in general practice.<h4>Methods</h4>General practices were randomised to either access to a guideline for acute LBP (control) or facilitated interactive workshops (intervention). We measured behavioural predictors (e.g. knowledge, attitudes and intentions) and fear avoidance beliefs. We were unable to recruit sufficient patients to measure our original primary outcomes so we introduced other outcomes measured at the general practitioner (GP) level: behavioural simulation (clinical decision about vignettes) and rates of x-ray and CT-scan (medical administrative data). All those not involved in the delivery of the intervention were blinded to allocation.<h4>Results</h4>47 practices (53 GPs) were randomised to the control and 45 practices (59 GPs) to the intervention. The number of GPs available for analysis at 12 months varied by outcome due to missing confounder information; a minimum of 38 GPs were available from the intervention group, and a minimum of 40 GPs from the control group. For the behavioural constructs, although effect estimates were small, the intervention group GPs had greater intention of practising consistent with the guideline for the clinical behaviour of x-ray referral. For behavioural simulation, intervention group GPs were more likely to adhere to guideline recommendations about x-ray (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.01, 3.05) and more likely to give advice to stay active (OR 4.49, 95%CI 1.90 to 10.60). Imaging referral was not statistically significantly different between groups and the potential importance of effects was unclear; rate ratio 0.87 (95%CI 0.68, 1.10) for x-ray or CT-scan.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The intervention led to small changes in GP intention to practice in a manner that is consistent with an evidence-based guideline, but it did not result in statistically significant changes in actual behaviour.<h4>Trial registration</h4>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012606000098538.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065471&type=printable
spellingShingle Simon D French
Joanne E McKenzie
Denise A O'Connor
Jeremy M Grimshaw
Duncan Mortimer
Jill J Francis
Susan Michie
Neil Spike
Peter Schattner
Peter Kent
Rachelle Buchbinder
Matthew J Page
Sally E Green
Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.
PLoS ONE
title Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.
title_full Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.
title_fullStr Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.
title_short Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.
title_sort evaluation of a theory informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice the implement cluster randomised trial
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065471&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT simondfrench evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT joanneemckenzie evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT deniseaoconnor evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT jeremymgrimshaw evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT duncanmortimer evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT jilljfrancis evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT susanmichie evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT neilspike evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT peterschattner evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT peterkent evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT rachellebuchbinder evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT matthewjpage evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial
AT sallyegreen evaluationofatheoryinformedimplementationinterventionforthemanagementofacutelowbackpainingeneralmedicalpracticetheimplementclusterrandomisedtrial