Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review

The purpose of the study was to analyze studies reporting pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer, reconstruction options, including advantages and disadvantages.Material and Methods. A literature search was performed using the Medline, Embase and C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. S. Belyaev, Y. A. Dykhno, A. A. Nesytyh
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk National Research Medical Center 2020-04-01
Series:Сибирский онкологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1408
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849408372569276416
author V. S. Belyaev
Y. A. Dykhno
A. A. Nesytyh
author_facet V. S. Belyaev
Y. A. Dykhno
A. A. Nesytyh
author_sort V. S. Belyaev
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the study was to analyze studies reporting pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer, reconstruction options, including advantages and disadvantages.Material and Methods. A literature search was performed using the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized clinical studies reporting the pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum were evaluated.Results. Although many surgical options are available for the management of perineal wounds after cylindrical abdominoperineal extirpation of the rectum, treatment remains challenging. Primary perineal defect closure is a simple and economical way to close a wound; however it has a high rate of perineal wound complications with occurrence of perineal hernia. Although various options of myo- and alloplastic reconstruction have several advantages, they are more labor-and cost-intensive.Conclusion. There is a lack of randomized trials reporting the closure of the perineal defect after extralevator abdominoperineal extirpation of the rectum. There remains no consensus on which management strategy is superior; therefore, further studies are needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-65a47b8fb25e4643b54dc4b1caac7e78
institution Kabale University
issn 1814-4861
2312-3168
language Russian
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
record_format Article
series Сибирский онкологический журнал
spelling doaj-art-65a47b8fb25e4643b54dc4b1caac7e782025-08-20T03:35:48ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk National Research Medical CenterСибирский онкологический журнал1814-48612312-31682020-04-0119212513110.21294/1814-4861-2020-19-2-125-131737Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature reviewV. S. Belyaev0Y. A. Dykhno1A. A. Nesytyh2A.I. Kryzhanovsky Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Oncologic DispensaryV.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia,A.I. Kryzhanovsky Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Oncologic DispensaryThe purpose of the study was to analyze studies reporting pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer, reconstruction options, including advantages and disadvantages.Material and Methods. A literature search was performed using the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized clinical studies reporting the pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum were evaluated.Results. Although many surgical options are available for the management of perineal wounds after cylindrical abdominoperineal extirpation of the rectum, treatment remains challenging. Primary perineal defect closure is a simple and economical way to close a wound; however it has a high rate of perineal wound complications with occurrence of perineal hernia. Although various options of myo- and alloplastic reconstruction have several advantages, they are more labor-and cost-intensive.Conclusion. There is a lack of randomized trials reporting the closure of the perineal defect after extralevator abdominoperineal extirpation of the rectum. There remains no consensus on which management strategy is superior; therefore, further studies are needed.https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1408colorectal cancerextralevator abdominoperineal excisionpelvic floor reconstruction
spellingShingle V. S. Belyaev
Y. A. Dykhno
A. A. Nesytyh
Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review
Сибирский онкологический журнал
colorectal cancer
extralevator abdominoperineal excision
pelvic floor reconstruction
title Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review
title_full Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review
title_fullStr Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review
title_short Pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: a literature review
title_sort pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum a literature review
topic colorectal cancer
extralevator abdominoperineal excision
pelvic floor reconstruction
url https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1408
work_keys_str_mv AT vsbelyaev pelvicfloorreconstructionafterextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionoftherectumaliteraturereview
AT yadykhno pelvicfloorreconstructionafterextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionoftherectumaliteraturereview
AT aanesytyh pelvicfloorreconstructionafterextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionoftherectumaliteraturereview