Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation
<p>Against the backdrop of increasing climate risks, strengthening the adaptive capacity of citizens is crucial. Yet, the usefulness of the concept of adaptive capacity is currently limited for science and policy, as it is not clear what exactly constitutes adaptive capacity nor whether capaci...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
| Online Access: | https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/1621/2025/nhess-25-1621-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850144638627741696 |
|---|---|
| author | A. Schubert A. von Streit M. Garschagen |
| author_facet | A. Schubert A. von Streit M. Garschagen |
| author_sort | A. Schubert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Against the backdrop of increasing climate risks, strengthening the adaptive capacity of citizens is crucial. Yet, the usefulness of the concept of adaptive capacity is currently limited for science and policy, as it is not clear what exactly constitutes adaptive capacity nor whether capacity translates into adaptation action. Drawing on survey data from 1571 households in southern Germany collected in 2022, we use regression analysis to examine the relationship between adaptive capacity indicators and the implementation of pluvial flood risk adaptation measures. Our results confirm a capacity–action gap, as high levels of adaptive capacity do not necessarily translate into household adaptation action. Widely used generic capacity indicators such as income and education are less important for adaptation decisions, while specific capacity indicators, such as risk perception, damage experience, and motivation, lead to action. We found initial evidence of a nonlinear effect: while a certain stock of financial and human capital is required, additional capital gains do not translate into additional adaptation action. Thus, enhancing the specific capacity of households should be a priority, as generic assets alone will not suffice in coping with climate risk.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-659976c7266f4ea38e8c47d50b7b843c |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1561-8633 1684-9981 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-659976c7266f4ea38e8c47d50b7b843c2025-08-20T02:28:19ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812025-05-01251621165310.5194/nhess-25-1621-2025Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptationA. Schubert0A. von Streit1M. Garschagen2Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany<p>Against the backdrop of increasing climate risks, strengthening the adaptive capacity of citizens is crucial. Yet, the usefulness of the concept of adaptive capacity is currently limited for science and policy, as it is not clear what exactly constitutes adaptive capacity nor whether capacity translates into adaptation action. Drawing on survey data from 1571 households in southern Germany collected in 2022, we use regression analysis to examine the relationship between adaptive capacity indicators and the implementation of pluvial flood risk adaptation measures. Our results confirm a capacity–action gap, as high levels of adaptive capacity do not necessarily translate into household adaptation action. Widely used generic capacity indicators such as income and education are less important for adaptation decisions, while specific capacity indicators, such as risk perception, damage experience, and motivation, lead to action. We found initial evidence of a nonlinear effect: while a certain stock of financial and human capital is required, additional capital gains do not translate into additional adaptation action. Thus, enhancing the specific capacity of households should be a priority, as generic assets alone will not suffice in coping with climate risk.</p>https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/1621/2025/nhess-25-1621-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | A. Schubert A. von Streit M. Garschagen Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
| title | Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation |
| title_full | Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation |
| title_fullStr | Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation |
| title_short | Unravelling the capacity–action gap in flood risk adaptation |
| title_sort | unravelling the capacity action gap in flood risk adaptation |
| url | https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/25/1621/2025/nhess-25-1621-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aschubert unravellingthecapacityactiongapinfloodriskadaptation AT avonstreit unravellingthecapacityactiongapinfloodriskadaptation AT mgarschagen unravellingthecapacityactiongapinfloodriskadaptation |